Religieuse Kommunikasie: 'n Verkenning
'n Verkenning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Articles
- Submited: November 11, 2022
-
Published: November 14, 2022
Abstract
THIS article explores the possibilities of religious communication as a field of study In the science of communication. The author adopts the point of view that religious communication is experienced by a large number of people. They claim the existence of a sender, messages, media, receivers, feed back, Interaction and communicative relations. "Explanations" for this religious phenomenon are presented by the sciences of theology, philosophy, psychology and sociology. The communication science should take cognisance of these findings. The focus of the communication sciences should fall on the religious response or expression or feedback by Individuals and groups. Religious language is one field of study. Another field of study is the communication dynamics as experienced in religious cults, symbols, ceremonies and acts. The first priority should be to identify and define the specific field of the communication sciences within the religious phenomena. Then, themes for research can be explored. In this article attention is given to different psychological "explanations" for religious communication e.g. the theory of projection, Infantilism, numinous experiences, archetypes, the pursuit of value systems, etc. Exploratory formulations for the religious communication of these theories are presented in this article. The transcendental explanation, namely the pre-scientific premise that God exists, is also discussed. Here, the accent for the communication science falls on responses which are divided into religious sensitivity, directional and expression responses.
Article Metrics Graph
References
- Freud, Sigmund. 1913. Totem und Tabu. Vertaal deur J. Strackey, 1961. Totem and Taboo. Londen, Lowe. p. 61-93.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1927. Die Zukunft einer Illusion. Leipzig, Internationaler psychonalistischer Verlag p. 24-37.
- Freud, Sigmund. 1930. Das Unbehagen in der kultur. Vertaal deur J. Strackey. 1961. Civilization and its discontents. New York. Morton. p. 70-75.
- Fortmann, H.M.M. 1968. Als ziende de onzienlijke, (1). Hilver sum, Paul Brand. p. 49-65.
- Fortmann. 1968. p. 67-76. Freud. 1930, p. 19-21.
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160210106
- Otto, R. 1932. Das Heilige, München, Boek'sche. Vergrote, A. 1967. Godsdienstpsychologie. Den Haag.
- Lanmoo. pp. 114-122, 391-393. 4. James, W. 1902 The varieties of religious experience. New
- York. Random House. p. 508-518. 5. Jung, C.G. 1940. Psychologie und Religion. Zürich, Rascher. Fortmann. 1968 (1). p. 145-306, 3(a) p. 51-116.
- Allport, G.W. 1953. The Individual and his Religion. New York, MacMillan p. 20.
- Frankl, Victor. 1967. Psychotherapy and Existentialism. New York. Washington Press. p. 82.
- Johnson, P.E. 1960. Psychology of Religion. New York, Abington Press. p. 63-65. 9.
- Benda, C.E. 1969. The existential approach to religion. In: Clinical psychiatry and religion. Ed. Pattison. Boston, Little Brown. p. 37-48.
- Plattel, M.G., 1960. De mens en het medemenslijke. Antwerp, Spectrum p. 25-66. 10.
- Buber, M. 1970. I and thou. Edinburgh. Clark- Kierkegaard.
- S. 1978. Two ages. Kierkegaard's writings. Princeton, New Jersey: University Press.
- Van Schoor, M. 1986. Wat is kommunikasie? Pretoria, Van p. 68-106.
- Hierdie drie kategorieë is die skrywer se formulering, gegrond op Vergote 1969. Faber, H. 1969. Geloof en ongeloof in een industrieel-tijdperk. Assen, Van Gorcum. Faber, H. 1972. Cirkelen om een geheim. Meppel, Boon. Fortmann 1968.
- James, W. 1902. p. 78-165. Allen, R.O. en Spilka, B. 1967. Committed and consensual religion. In: Joumal for the Scientific study of Religion. 1967 (b) p. 191-206.
- Clark, W.H. 1968. The psychology of religion. New York. Mac Millan. Kuylman-Hoekendijk, C. 1969. Dwarslagen in de Christenheid. Baam, Bosch en Keuning
- Navorsing op die terrein is huidiglik hier en daar aan die gang. Een voorbeeld is dié van Ronél Rensburg van Unisa oor 'n kommunikasiekundige beskrywing van die transendente er varing (beskou uit die hoek van die mistieke ervaring).