Advance Search

Towards a general theory of public relations

Defina Holtzhausen
ABSA Bank
Sonja Verwey
University of Johannesburg
Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Share:

How to Cite

Towards a general theory of public relations. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 15(2), 25-56. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v15i2.1908
  • Articles
  • Submited: November 1, 2022
  • Published: November 3, 2022

Abstract

The existence of a general theory of public relations is pivotal to the argumentation about public relations as science. A general theory can be expected to supply a framework which includes aU the theoretical applications within a scientific domain. This article sets out to cover the theoretical applications made to the field of public relations to detennine what the domain parameters of public relations are and whether this can lead to a general theory of public relations. It proposes that public relations is an applied science, govemed by theory application at the meta theoretical, organisational and communication levels of public relations practice, and that public relations practice takes place at three strategic levels in the organisation, namely the macro, meso and micro level. The article further suggested that two normative and one positive model of public relations practice exist and that the heuristic value of the general theory is one of its most positive aspects.

pdf
pdf

Article Metrics Graph

Created with Highstock 6.0.4ViewsChart context menuMonthly Views44994410102211000000000000111100000000004400004455113344330000110022110033000000000000000000001 7141 714660000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0500100015002000Highcharts.com
Article Views | PDF Downloads
Chart Graph | Range Graph

References

  1. ANDERSON, D.S. (1992). Identifying and responding to activist publics: A case study. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(3), 151-166.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0403_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0403_02
  3. ARONOFF, C., & BASKIN, O. (1988). Public relations: The profession and the practice. St.Paul,MN : West Publishing.
  4. BAUER, R. (1972). The obstinate audience: The influence process from the point of view of social communication. In The process and effects of mass communication; edited by W. Schramm & D.F. Roberts (pp.326-346). Urbana: University of illinois.
  5. BOTAN, Carl. (1989). Theory development in public relations.ln Public relations theCJlY; edited by Carl H. Botan & Vincent Hazleton, Jr.(pp.99-11 0). Hilisdale,N~: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-6
  7. BROOM, G.M. (1977). Coorientational measurement of public issues. In Public Relations Review, 3(4).
  8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(77)80010-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(77)80010-6
  9. CHEYNEY, G., & DIONISOPOULOS, G.N. (1989). Public relations? No relations with publics: A rhetorical-organizational approach to contemporary corporate communication. In Public relations theory; edited by Cart H. Botan and Vincent Hazleton, Jr. (pp.135- 157). Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  10. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-8
  11. CLINE, C.G. (1985). Public relations: The $1 million dollar penalty for being a woman. In Women in mass communication: Challenging gender values; edited by P.J. Creedon (pp.263-275). Newbury Park,CA: Sage.
  12. COOMBS, W. (1993). Philosophical underpinnings: Ramifications of a pluralist paradigm. Public Relations Review,19(2),111-119.
  13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90002-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90002-T
  14. CRABLE, R.E., & VIBBERT, S.L. (1986). Public relations as communications
  15. management. Edina, MN : Bellwether Press.
  16. CREEDON, P .J. (1990). Public relations and 'women's' work: Towards a feminist analysis of public relations roles. Public Relations Research Annual, 3, 67-84. Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_3
  18. CREEDON, P.J. (1993). Acknowledging the infrasystem: A critical feminist analysis of systems theory. Public Relations Review, 19(2),157-166.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90005-W DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90005-W
  20. CUTLIP, S.M.,. CENTER, A.H., & BROOM, G.M. (1985). Effective public relations (6th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  21. DEWEY, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow.
  22. DUNN, S.W. (1986). Public relations. Homewood, II : Irwin.
  23. EHLlNG, W.P. (1984). Application of a decision theory in the construction of a theory of public relations management I. Public Relations Research & Education, 1 (2), 25-38.
  24. EHLlNG, W.P. (1985). Application of a decision· theory in the construction of a theory of public relations management IIPublic Relations Research & Education, 2(1), 4-22.
  25. ETTEMA, J.S., BROWN, J.W., & LEUPKER, R.V. (1983). Knowledge gaps in a health information campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(4),516-527.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1086/268809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/268809
  27. EVERETT, ~I.L. (1990). Organizational culture and ethnoecology in public relations theory and practice. Public Relations Research Annual, 2, 235-251.
  28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0201-4_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0201-4_11
  29. GANDY, O.H.,Jr. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  30. GANDY, O.H.,Jr. (1989). Public relations and public policy: Thestructuration of dominance in the information age. In Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations; edited by Elizabeth L. Toth & Robert L. Heath (pp.131- 163).Hill~dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  31. GAZIANO, C. (1984). Neighbourhood newspapers, citizen groups and public affairs knowledge gaps. Joumalism Quarterly, 61 (3), 556-566.
  32. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100312
  33. GRUNIG, J.E. (1975). Some consistent types of employee publics. Public Relations Review, 1 (4),17-36.
  34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(75)80003-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(75)80003-8
  35. GRUNIG, J.E. (1976). Organizations and public relations. Journalism Monographs, 46. Columbia: University of Southern California.
  36. GRUNIG, J.E. (1978). Defining publics in public relations: The case of a suburban hospital. Journalism Quarterly, 55(1),109-118.
  37. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907805500115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907805500115
  38. GRUNIG, J.E. (1979). A general systems theory of communications, poverty, and underdevelopment. In International and intercultural communications; edited by F.L. Casmir (pp.72-104). Wash-ington: University Press of America.
  39. GRUNIG, J.E. (1982). The messageattitude- behavior relationship: communication behaviors of organizations. Communication Research, 9, 163-200.
  40. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365082009002001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365082009002001
  41. GRUNIG, J.E. (1983a). Washington reporter publics of corporate public affairs programmes. Journalism Quarterly, 60(4), 603-614.
  42. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908306000404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908306000404
  43. GRUNIG, J.E. (1983b). Communication behavior and attitudes of environmental publics: Two studies. Journalism Monographs, 81, (March).
  44. GRUNIG, J.E. (1984). Organizations, environments and models of public relations. PubliC Relations Research & Education, 1(1),6-29.
  45. GRUNIG, J.E. (1985). A structural reconceptualization of the organizational communication audit with application to a state department of education. Paper presented to the Public Relations Interest Group, Internal Communication Association, Honolulu, Hawaii. (March).
  46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(85)80039-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(85)80039-4
  47. GRUNIG, J.E. (1989a). Sierra Club study shows who become activists. Public Relations Review, 15(3),3-24.
  48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(89)80001-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(89)80001-3
  49. GRUNIG, J.E. (1989b). Symmetrical presupppositions as a framework for public relations theory. In Public relations theory, edited by Carl H. Botan & Vincent Hazleton, Jr.(pp.17-44). Hillsdale,NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  50. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-2
  51. GRUNIG, J.E. (1990). The development of public relations research in the United States and its status in communication science. Paper presented to the Professional Conference of the Herbert Quandt Foundation Communication Group, Salzburg, Austria.
  52. GRUNIG, J.E. (1992). Symmetrical systems of internal communication. In Excellence in public relations and communication management; edited by James E. Grunig (pp.531-575). Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  53. GRUNIG, J.E., & Childers, L. (1988). Reconstruction of a situational theory of communication: Internal and external concepts as identifiers of publics for AIDS. Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Portland, Oregan. (July).
  54. GRUNIG, J.E., & GRUNIG, L.A. (1992). Models of public relations and communications. I n Excellence in public relations and communication management; edited by J.E. Grunig (pp.285-325).Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  55. GRUNIG, J.E., & HUNT, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
  56. GRUNIG, J.E., & REPPER, F.C. (1992). Strategic management, publics and issues. In Excellence in public relations and communication management; edited by James E. Grunig (pp.11-158). Hilisdale,NJ : Lawrence Er1baum Assoc.
  57. GRUNIG, J.E., & THEUS, K.T. (1986). Internal communication systems and employee satisfaction. Paper presented to the PubliC Relations Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Norman, Oklahoma.(August).
  58. GRUNIG, J.E., & WHITE, J. (1992). The effects of worldviews on public relations theory and practice. ln Excellence in public relations and communication management; edited by James E. Grunig (pp.31-64). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Er1baumAssoc.
  59. GRUNIG, L.A. (1986a). Activism and organizatio+6nal response: Contemporary cases of collective behavior. Paper presented to the Public Relations Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Norman, OK. (Allgust).
  60. GRUNIG, L.A. (1986b). Environmental and organizational response: Contemporary cases of collective behavior. Paper presented to the 15th annual conference of the North American Association for Environmental Education. Eugene, OR.(September).
  61. GRUNIG, L.A. (1988). A research agenda for women in public relations. PubliC Relations Review, 14(3),48-57.
  62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(88)80047-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(88)80047-X
  63. GRUNIG, L.A. (1989). Horizontal structures in public relations: An experimental study of departmental differentiation. Public Relations Research Annual, 1, 175-196. Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  64. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0101-4_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0101-4_10
  65. GRUNIG, L.A. (1989a). Applications of feminist scholarship to public relations: Displacing the male models. Paper presented to the National Women's Studies Association, Towson, MD. June.
  66. GRUNIG, L.A. (1989b). Towards a feminist transformation of public relations education and practice. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington. August.
  67. GRUNIG, L.A. (1992). Towards the philosophy of public relations. ln Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations; edited by Elizabeth L. Toth and Robert L. Heath (pp.65-91). Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  68. GRUNIG, L.A. (1994). A positive relativist philosophy of public relations. In Normative Aspekte der Public Relations; edited by Wolfgang Armbrecht and Ulf Zabel (pp.13-34). Opladen: Der Westdeutsche Verlag.
  69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_1
  70. GRUNIG, L.A. (1995). The consequences of culture for public relations: The case of women in the foreign service. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7(2),139-161.
  71. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0702_03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0702_03
  72. GRUNIG, LA, GRUNIG, .I.E., & WHITE, J. (1992). What is an effective organization? In Excellence in public relations and communication management; edited by James E. Grunig (pp.65-90). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  73. HAGE, J., & HULL, F. (1981). A typology of environmental niches based on knowledge, technology and scale: The implications of innovation and productivity. Working Paper no.1, University of Maryland, Center for the Study of Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Organizational Strategy, College Park.
  74. HAMILTON, PK (1989). Application of a generalized persuasion model to public relations research. Public Relations Research Annual, 1,323-334.
  75. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-19
  76. HAZLETON, V. Jr. (1990). Towards a systems theory of public relations. Paper presented at the Herbert Quandt Stiftung conference on the Status of Public Relations as a Science, Salzburg, Austria. December.
  77. HAZLETON, V., & BOTAN, C.H. (1989). The role of theory in public relations. In Public relations theory; edited by Carl H.Botan and Vincent Hazleton, Jr. (pp.3-16). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  78. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-1
  79. HEATH, RL. (1990). Corporate issues management: Theoretical underpinnings and research foundations. Public Relations Research Annual, 2, 29-65.
  80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0201-4_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0201-4_2
  81. HEATH, RL. (1992a). The wrangle in the marketplace: A rhetorical perspective of public relations. In Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations; edited by Elizabeth L. Toth and Robert L. Heath (pp.17-36). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  82. HEATH, RL. (1992b). Visions of critical studies of public relations. In Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations; edited by Elizabeth L. Toth and Robert L. Heath (pp.315-319).Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  83. HEATH, R.L., & DOUGLAS, W. (1990). Involvement: A key variable in people's reaction to public policy. Public Relations Research Annual, 2, 193-204.
  84. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0201-4_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0201-4_8
  85. HOLTZHAUSEN, D.R. (1995). The role of public relations theory and research in a postmodern approach to communication management in the organisation. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Johannesburg: Rand Afrikaans University.
  86. HON, L.C. (1995). Towards a feminist theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7(1j,27-88.
  87. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0701_03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0701_03
  88. JOHNSON, D.J. (1989). The coorientation model and consultant roles. In Public relations theory; edited by Carl H. Botan and Vincent Hazleton,Jr. (pp.243-265). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  89. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-14
  90. KUHLMANN, W. (1994). Rhetorik und Ethik. In Normative Aspekte der Public Relations; edited by Wolfgang Armbrecht and Ulf Zabel. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_2
  92. KUNCZIK, M. (1994). Public Relations: Angewandte Kommunikationswissenschaft oder Ideologie? Ein Beitrag zur Ethik der Offentiichkeitsarbeit. In Normative Aspekte der Public Relations; edited by Wolfgang Armbrecht and Ulf Zabel. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_11
  94. KNODEL, Joyce E. (1976). Matching perceptions of food editors, writers and readers. Public Relations Review, 2(3), 37-56.
  95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(76)80032-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(76)80032-X
  96. LAUZEN, M.M. (1992). Public relations roles, intraorganisational power, and encroachment. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(2),61-80.
  97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0402_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0402_01
  98. LAUZEN, M.M., & DOZIER, D.M. (1992). The missing link: The public relations manager role as mediator of organizational environments and power consequences for the function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(4), 205-220.
  99. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0404_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0404_2
  100. LAUZEN, M.M., & DOZIER, D.M. (1994). Issues management mediation of linkages between environmental complexity and management of the public relations function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(3), 163-184.
  101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0603_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0603_02
  102. LITLLEJOHN, S. (1989). Theories of human communication. 3rd edition. Belmont ,Ca: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.
  103. LONG, L.W., & HAZLETON, V.,Jr. (1987). Public relations: A theoretic and practical response.Public Relations Review, 13(2), 3- 13.
  104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(87)80034-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(87)80034-6
  105. MCLEOD, J.M., & CHAFFEE, S.T. (1973). Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioral Scientist (pp.469-479).
  106. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301600402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301600402
  107. MASSY, W.F. & WEITZ, BA (1977). A normative theory of market segmentation. In Behavioral models for market analysis: Foundations for marketing action; edited by F.M. Nicosia and Y. Wind (pp.121-144). Hinsdale,lI: Dryden.
  108. MENDLESOHN, H. (1969). What to say to whom in social amelioration. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
  109. MENDLESOHN, H., ESPIE, T., & ROGERS, G.M.(1973). "Operation Gap-Stop". Crisis in urban communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(2). New York: Columbia University Press.
  110. MILLER, G.R. (1989). Persuasion and public relations: Two "Ps" in a pOd. I n Public relations theory; edited by Carl H.Botan and Vincent Hazleton, Jr. (pp. 45-66). Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  111. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-3
  112. MINTZBERG, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice Hall.
  113. MOFFIT, MA (1992). Bringing critical theory and ethical considerations to definitions of a public. Public Relations Review, 18(1), 17-29.
  114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(92)90018-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(92)90018-T
  115. MURPHY, P. (1989). Game theory as a paradigm for the public relations process. In Public relations theory; edited by Carl H. Botan and Vincent Hazleton, Jr. (pp.17'3-192). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  116. MURPHY, P. (1991). The limits of symmetry: A game theory approach to symmetric and asymmetic public relations. Public Relations Research Annual, 3, 115-131.
  117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_5
  118. NEFF, B.D. (1989). The emerging theoretical perspective in PR: An opportunity for communication departments. In Public relations theory; edited by Carl H. Botan and Vincent Hazleton,Jr. (pp.159-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  119. OLASKY, M.N. (1989). The aborted debate within public relations: An approach through Kuhn's paradigm. Public Relations Research Annual, 1,87-96.
  120. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0101-4_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0101-4_4
  121. OLSON, M. (1982). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  122. O'SULLIVAN, T., HARTLEY, J., SAUNDERS, D., & FISKE, J. (1989). Key concepts in communication. (3rd ed.) London: Routledge.
  123. PEARSON, R. (1989). A theory of public relations ethics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio University, Ohio.
  124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(89)80054-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(89)80054-2
  125. PINCUS, J.D., ACHARYA, L., TROTIER, E.P. & ST. MICHIEL, C. (1991). Conflict between public relations agencies and their clients: A game theory analysis. Public Relations Research Annual, 3,151-163.
  126. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_7
  127. PINCUS, J., RIMMER, T., RAYFIELD, R.E., & CROPP, F. (1993). Newspaper editors' perception of public relations: How business, news, and sports editors differ. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5(1), 27-45.
  128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0501_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0501_02
  129. PRIOR-MILLER, M. (1989). Four major social scientific theories and their value to the public relations researcher. I n Public relations theory; edited by Carl H. Botan & Vincent Hazleton, Jr. (pp.67-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  130. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-4
  131. RAKOW, L.F. (1989a). Information and power: Towards a critical theory of information campaigns. In Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change; edited by T. Salmon (pp.164-184). Newbury Park CA: Sage.
  132. RAKOW, L.F. (1989b). From the feminization of public relations to the promise of feminism. In Beyond the velvet ghetto; edited by E.L. Toth and C.G. Cline (pp.287-298). San Francisco: International Association of Business Communicators.
  133. REYNOLDS, P.D. (1971). A primer in theory construction. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
  134. ROKEACH M. (1968). The role of values in public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vo1.32.
  135. https://doi.org/10.1086/267645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267645
  136. ROKEACH. M. (1979). Understanding human values: Individual and societal. New York: The Free Press.
  137. SALMON, C.T. (Ed)(1989). Information campaigns: balancing social values and social change. Newbury Park.CA: Sage.
  138. SCHNEIDER [aka Grunig], L.A. (1985). The role of public relations in four organizational types. Journalism Quarterly, 62(3). 567-576,594.
  139. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908506200316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908506200316
  140. SCHULZ, B. (1990). A confrontation of two national schools of thought. Transatlantic talks, Reviving the tradition.
  141. SIGNITZER, B. (1990). Can public relations be a science? Transatlantic talks. Reviving the valuable tradition.
  142. SRIRAMESH, K., GRUNIG, J.E., & BUFFINGTON, J. (1992). Corporate culture and public relations. In Excellence in public relations and communication management; edited by James E. Grunig (pp.577-595). Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence ErIbaum Assoc.
  143. SRIRAMESH, K. & WHITE, J. (1992). Societal culture and public relations. In Excellence in public relations and communication management; edited by James E. Grunig (pp.597-614). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  144. THEUS, K.T. (1991). Organizational ideology, structure and communication efficacy: A causal analysis. Public Relations Research Annual, 3, 133-149.
  145. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_6
  146. TICHENOR, P.J., DONOHUE, G.A., & OLlEN, C.N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170.
  147. https://doi.org/10.1086/267786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267786
  148. TOTH, E.L. (1988). Making peace with gender issues in public relations. Public Relations Review, 14(3),36-47.
  149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(88)80046-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(88)80046-8
  150. TOTH, E.L. (1989). The case for pluralistic studies of public relations: Rhetorical, critical, and systems perspective. In Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations; edited by Elizabeth L. Toth and Robert L. Heath (pp.3-15). Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  151. TOTH, E.L. (1992). The case for pluralistic studies of public relations: Rhetorical, critical, and systems perspectives. In Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations; edited by Elizabeth L. Toth and Robert L. Heath (pp.3-15). Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  152. TOTH, E.L. (1994). The normative nature of public relations: A rhetorical analysis. In Normative Aspekte der Public Relations; edited by Wolfgang Armbrecht and Ulf Zabel (pp.17-67). Opladen: Westdeatscher Verlag.
  153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_3
  154. VAN LEUVEN, J.K. (1989). Theoretical model for public relations campaigns. In Public Relations Theory, edited by Carl H.Botan and Vincent Hazleton, Jr. (pp.193-202). Hilisdale,NJ: Lawrence ErIbaum Assoc.
  155. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812860-11
  156. VAN LEUVEN, J.K. & SLATER, M.D. (1991). How publics, public relations and the media shape the public opinion process. In Public Relations Research Annual, 3,165-178. Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  157. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_8
  158. VASQUEZ, G.M. (1994). Testing a communication theory-methodmessage-behavior complex for the investigation of publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(4), 267-291.
  159. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0604_04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0604_04
How to Cite
Towards a general theory of public relations. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 15(2), 25-56. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v15i2.1908

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
    • Clarivate