Advance Search

Using a Delphi Method in the Future of PR and Communication Global Study: South African Findings on Social Impact and PR Education

Dalien Rene Benecke | Bio
University of Johannesburg
Padhma Moodley | Bio
University of Johannesburg
Corne Meintjes | Bio
University of Johannesburg
Lida Holtzhausen | Bio
North-West University
Anette Degenaar | Bio
North-West University
Neil H Levy | Bio
University of Johannesburg
Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2025 Dalien Rene Benecke, Padhma Moodley, Corne Meintjes, Lida Holtzhaisen, Anette Degenaar, Neil H Levy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Share:

How to Cite

Using a Delphi Method in the Future of PR and Communication Global Study: South African Findings on Social Impact and PR Education. (2025). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 44(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.36615/7s3kt098
  • Articles
  • Submited: February 16, 2024
  • Published: May 6, 2025

Abstract

Public relations in Africa and South Africa has evolved in accordance with its changing landscape.  The purpose of this article is to present the views of South African public relations educators and practitioners who participated in a global study titled “The Future of PR and Communication and Their Social Impact”. Earlier studies on the roles of public relations in South Africa highlighted its strategic role with reports that South African public relations practitioners indicated an increase in strategic influence but with limited understanding and use of measurement applications and social impact analysis, which are key components in showcasing the influence of public relations in society. It is therefore essential to revisit the perceptions of public relations practitioners and educators of their roles and the social impact on society, together with their influence on public relations education.

The global study “The Future of PR and Communication and Their Social Impact” applied a Delphi-method approach, which included various rounds of concept testing and meaning-making.  Significant findings obtained from these participants are aligned with international views and include an emphasis on the integration of communication activities with organisational business objectives, as well as practical, real-life experiences included in public relations education. Participants agreed that social impact could be achieved through stakeholder engagement, agenda setting, creating awareness and influencing the corporate social responsibility focus of organisations. Participants viewed social value as the outcome of social impact activities.

PDF
PDF

Article Metrics Graph

Article Views | PDF Downloads
Chart Graph | Range Graph

References

  1. Adi, A., & Stoeckle, T. (2023). Public Relations as Responsible Persuasion: Activism and Social Change. In D. Pompper, K. R. Place, & N. Weaver (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Public Relations (pp. 302-314). Routledge.
  2. Adi, A (2022). The future of Public Relations. Unpublished notes. Berlin: Quadriga University of Applied Sciences.
  3. Adi, A., & Stoeckle, T. (2021). Introduction: Future of Communications and Public Relations (PR). (Re)Imagining the Role, Function and Purpose of the Communication Profession. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies, 14(1(27): 7-14. https://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/521
  4. Adi, A. (2019). PR2025: trends, competencies and solutions for the near future of PR/Communications – Results of a Delphi method study. Quadriga University of Applied Sciences.
  5. Austin, L.L., & Toth, E.L., (2011). Exploring ethics education in global public relations curricula: Analysis of international curricula descriptions and interviews with public relations educators. Public Relations Review, 37: 506-512
  6. Bakir, V., Herring, E., Miller, D. & Robinson, P. (2019). Organised persuasive communication: A new conceptual framework for research on public relations, propaganda and promotional culture. Critical Sociology, 45(3): 311-328.
  7. Benecke, D.R; Muir, C; Porthen, D; Van Wyk, H and Du Plessis, N. 2021. The Role of the Global Capability Framework within the Strategic Communication Profession in an Emerging Post COVID-19 Context: A South African Perspective. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies. Volume 14 Issue 1(27): 137-159
  8. Bongo, M. F., & Sy, C. L. (2023). Can diverse and conflicting interests of multiple stakeholders be balanced? Annals of Operations Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05253-1
  9. Campaign Collective. 2018a. Definition of social impact of communications launched (PRCA). -https://campaigncollective.org/2018/10/30/definition-of-social-impact-of-communications-launched/ Date of access: 1 Sep.2022
  10. Campaign Collective. 2018b. Project to increase social impact of communications launched. https://campaigncollective.org/2018/08/14/project-to-increase-social-impact-of-communications-launched/ Date of access: 1 Sep. 2022
  11. Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2009). Does stakeholder management have a darkside? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4): 491–507.
  12. Coombs, W.T & Holladay, S.J. (2013). Its not just PR: PR in society. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  13. Dalkey, N.C., Helmer O. (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts, Manage. Sci. 9 (3): 458–467.
  14. De Bruin, T. & Rosemann, M. (2007). Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas. ACIS 2007 Proceedings. Association for information systems. Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas (core.ac.uk)
  15. Engels, T.C.E & Kennedy, H.P. (2007) Enhancing a Delphi study on family-focused prevention. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74: 433-451.
  16. Fawkes, J. (2018). The evolution of public relations research–an overview. Communication and Society, 31(4): 159-171.
  17. Gregory, A. (2004). Public Relations in Practice, 2nd edition. Kogan Page. VA.
  18. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4): 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
  19. Hagelstein, J., Einwiller, S., Zerfass, A. (2021). The ethical dimension of public relations in Europe: Digital channels, moral challenges, resources, and training. Public Relations Review 47(4).
  20. Harrison, J.S., Freeman, R.E., & de Abreu, M.C.S. (2015). Stakeholder theory as an ethical approach to effective management: Applying the theory to multiple contexts. Review of Public Relations Review, 37 (5): 506-512
  21. Hörisch, J., Schaltegger, S., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: A conceptual synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2020.124097
  22. Kent, M.L.& Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28 (1): 21-37
  23. Lee, K. (2020) A phenomenological exploration of the student experience of online PhD studies. Internation Journal of Doctoral Students. 15: 575-593. Https://doi.org/10.28945/4645
  24. Linneberg, M.S. and Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding Qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative research DOI: 10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012 Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332957319_Coding_qualitative_data_a_synthesis_guiding_the_novice [accessed Jan 08 2024]
  25. Macnamara, J. (2022). Organizational Listening in Public Communication: Emerging theory and practice. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/158330/2/Organizational%20Listening%20%20Emerging%20Theory%20%26%20Practice.pdf
  26. Meyer, I. (2017). A metamodern stakeholder relationship management model for non-profit organisations University of South Africa. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Pretoria.
  27. Meyer, I. & Barker, R. 2020. A metamodern model for managing stakeholder relationships in non-profit organisations. Communicare, 39(1): 56–79.
  28. Moloney, K., & McGrath, C. (2021). Rethinking public relations: Persuasion, democracy and society. Public Relations Education, 7(1): 220-226.
  29. Nasa, P., Jain, R. and Juneja, D. (2021). Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J. Methodology, 2021, 11(4) 116-129 Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness - PMC (nih.gov)
  30. Orts, E.W. & Strudler, A. (2010). Putting a stake in stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 88: 605–615.
  31. Okoli, C. & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42: 15-29.
  32. Pieczka, M. (2019). Looking back and going forward: The concept of the public in public relations theory. Public Relations Inquiry, 8(3):225-244.
  33. Rubin, A. T. (2021). Rocking Qualitative Social Science: An Irreverent Guide to Rigorous Research. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BZE2EAAAQBAJ
  34. Sablatzky, T. (2022). Delphi method. Hypothesis, 34. https://doi.org/10.18060/26224
  35. Swanson, DJ. (2008). Training future PR Practitioners and serving the community through a “learn by doing” undergraduate university curriculum. Public relations Quarterly, 54(3): 15-20.
  36. Suárez-Monsalve, A.-M. (2022). Evolution of the public relations profession in Latin America: A brief review of the development of public relations in Latin American countries. Public Relations Inquiry, 11(2):257-274.
  37. Thompson, G. (2020). Post-Truth Public Relations. Communicating in an Era of Digital Disinformation. Routledge.
  38. Trialogue. Business in Society Handbook, 26th edition. (2023).
  39. Verčič, D., van Ruler, B., Bütschi, G., & Flodin, B. (2001). On the definition of public relations: a European view. Public Relations Review, 27(4): 373-387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00095-9"https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00095-9
  40. Verwey, S. (2015). Paradigms, perspectives and practices of public relations and communication: Implications for ‘disciplined imagination’ in South African scholarship. Communitas, 20: 1-25.
  41. Wolfe, R.A. & Putler, D.S. (2002). How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups? Organization science. Vol. 13 (1), pp. 64-80.
  42. Zerfass, A, Verčič, D. & Wiesenberg, M. (2016). The dawn of a new golden age for media relations? How PR professionals interact with the mass media and use new collaboration practices, Public Relations Review, 42 (4): 499-508
How to Cite
Using a Delphi Method in the Future of PR and Communication Global Study: South African Findings on Social Impact and PR Education. (2025). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 44(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.36615/7s3kt098

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
    • Clarivate