Technology and welfare Investigating the relationship between the ownership of technology-based assets and subjective measures of human well-being

Main Article Content

Alexander C O’Riordan

Keywords

technology, welfare, technology-based assets, well-being

Abstract

The relationship between technology and individual welfare is not well understood, and as we progress into a future in which technology invades almost every aspect of life, the importance of this relationship must be recognised and an improved understanding reached. In this study, we attempt to lay a foundation for such an understanding. Using an approach based on Sen’s theory of Capabilities and the South African National Income Dynamic Survey (NIDS), it estimates the effects of the ownership of technological assets on self-reported measures of well-being, both subjective and objective. Any empirical analysis of this relationship needs to control for several confounding factors. The estimation procedure employed is based on a dynamic panel approach, one that is capable of controlling for individual effects, as well as potential sources of endogeneity such as reverse causality. The results indicate that there is a statistically significant relationship between changes in the composition and value of one’s technological asset portfolio and measures of social and economic well-being. Specifically, they show that increased ownership of technological assets improves one’s overall life satisfaction and health status, but has little effect on one’s positivity about the future. This study has found evidence that technology can improve lives when controlling for confounders such as increased wealth and status. Future work can improve upon this by better understanding the dynamics of this relationship, and disaggregating further by type of technology.

Abstract 83 | PDF Downloads 81

References

Arellano, M & S R. ond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Casale, D & D Posel. 2011. ‘Unions and the gender wage gap in South Africa’. Journal of African Economies, 20(1): 27-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejq029
Cerny, B A and H F Kaiser. 1977. ‘A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices’. Multivariate behavioral research, 12(1): 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3
Clark, D A & M Qizilbash. 2005. ‘Core poverty, basic capabilities and vagueness: An application to the South African context’. GPRG-WPS-026. Manchester: University of Manchester (Global Poverty Research Group).
Kiviet, J F. 1995. ‘On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models’. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1): 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-E
Nickel, S. 1981. ‘Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects’. Econometrica, 49(6): 1417-1426. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408
Sen, A. 1985. ‘Well-being, agency and freedom’. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4): 169-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
Windmeijer, F. 2005. ‘A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators’. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1): 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005
Wold, S, K Esbensen & P Geladi. 1987. ‘Principal component analysis’. Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, 2(1-3): 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9