‘New-new’ diplomacy A new technological dawn

Main Article Content

Robyn Williams https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8210-5487

Keywords

diplomacy, fourth industrial revolution, 4IR diplmacy

Abstract

DIPLOMACY is often characterised in terms of two phases: ‘old’ and ‘new’. Old diplomacy dates from the era of Greek city-states until 1814, when the Congress of Vienna prompted a new phase in diplomacy. Both phases were influenced by trends in international relations, the needs of the state, and the tools that were available at the time. Old diplomacy was secretive, with a small pool of actors. New diplomacy was more open, with the introduction of multilateralism as well as non-state actors. Today, however, a wider array of actors and instruments is at play in international relations. This article argues that a third phase in diplomacy is unfolding, referred to as the ‘new-new’ diplomacy. This has been prompted by the fourth industrial revolution, as artificial intelligence, big data, and the Internet of Things have come to play a significant role This article explores the nature of and trends in the ‘new-new’ diplomacy. It is qualitative, comprising desktop research. It explores primary and secondary literature and refers to several real-world examples that have become apparent over the past five years. The main finding is that contemporary global trends and the influence of advanced technology will not change the relevance of diplomacy and diplomatic agents, but will rather complement it. Diplomacy will remain resilient and agile.


Diplomacy is often referred to in two phases, old and new. Old diplomacy dates from the era of Greek city-states until 1814, when the Congress of Vienna was formed, prompting a new phase in diplomacy- new diplomacy. Both phases were influenced by trends in international relations, the needs of the state and the tools that were available at the time. Old diplomacy was secretive with a small pool of actors. New diplomacy became more open with the introduction of multilateralism and state and non-state actors. However, today, there is a wider array of actors and tools at play in international relations. This article argues that there is a third phase in diplomacy that is unfolding, as referred to in the paper as new 'new' diplomacy. This third phase of diplomacy is prompted by the fourth industrial revolution, as artificial intelligence, big data, and the Internet of Things come to play a significant role in international relations. This article explores the trends and characteristics of a new 'new' diplomacy. The study is qualitative, comprising desktop research. It explores primary and secondary literature and refers to several real-world examples that have been visible over the past five years. The global trends and influence of advanced technology may not change the relevance of diplomacy and diplomatic agents but rather complement the practice. It is predicted that, as with old and new diplomacy, diplomacy will remain resilient and agile, resulting in a new 'new' diplomacy.

Abstract 1241 | PDF Downloads 412

References

Al-Alawi, H. 2019. ‘Qualities of a good diplomat’. Diplomat Magazine. At http://www.diplomatmagazine.eu/
Al Muftah, H. 2018. ‘Factors influencing e-diplomacy implementation: exploring causal relationships using interpretive structural modelling.’ Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.002
Bangkok Post. 2020.’”LOL!”: China’s informal, confrontational Twitter diplomacy. At https://www.bangkokpost.com/
Boehler, P. 2014. ‘”Off-the-grid” messaging application FireChat continues to ride Occupy boost’. South China Morning Post. At https://www.scmp.com/news/
Bousfield, D. 2017. ‘Revisiting cyber-diplomacy: Canada-China relations online’. Globalizations, 14 (6), 1045-1059. At https://www.tandfonline.com/. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2017.1362176
Bull, H. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24028-9_2
Cranston, P. 2011. ‘Tools for 21st century diplomats.’ Diplo Foundation. At https://www.diplomacy.edu/
Dumčiuvienė, A. 2016. ‘Twiplomacy: the meaning of social media to public diplomacy and foreign policy of Lithuania.’ Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 35. https://doi.org/10.1515/lfpr-2016-0005
Edelman, R D. 2020. ‘Here’s how to regulate artificial intelligence properly’. The Washington Post. At https://www.washingtonpost.com/
Alliance France-Presse. 2020. ‘US government agency website hacked by group claiming to be from Iran.’ The Guardian. At https://www.theguardian.com/
Garcia, E. 2019. ‘The militarization of artificial intelligence: a wake-up call for the Global South.’ SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3452323
Géraud, André and Pertinax. ‘Diplomacy, Old and New’. Foreign Affairs, 23 (2), Council on Foreign Relations, 1945, 256–70. At https://doi.org/10.2307/20029892
Gracie, M, W D Eggers and N Malik. 2019. ‘Using AI to unleash the power of unstructured government data’. Deloitte Insights. At https://www2.deloitte.com/
Grottola, S. 2018. ‘Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy: a new tool for diplomats?’ Digital Watch. At https://dig.watch/
Group of Governmental Experts for Lethal Autonomous Weapons (LAW). 2019. Annual Report, Geneva, 25 September 2019. At https://internet-governance-radar.de/en/
Hanson, F. 2012. ‘Revolution@State: The Spread of E-Diplomacy’. Lowry Institute for International Policy. At https://www.brookings.edu/
Hare, P W. 2016. Making Diplomacy Work: Intelligent Innovation for the Modern World. United Kingdom: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483395944
Hennessey, E. 2019. ‘What is science diplomacy?’ Biologist, 66 (1), 26–29. Ar http://0-search.ebscohost.com.ujlink.uj.ac.za/
Hocking, B and J Melissen. 2015. Diplomacy in the Digital Age. Clingendael Netherlands Institute for International Relations. Clingendael Report. At https://www.clingendael.org/
Hutchings, R and J Suri. 2020. Modern Diplomacy in Practice. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Avt https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26933-3
Killbride, E. 2020. ‘The Brexit saga: sentiment analysis of the story so far’. Aylien. At https://blog.aylien.com/
Kirkpatrick, K. 2016. ‘Battling algorithmic bias: how do we ensure algorithms treat us fairly?’ Commun. ACM 59 (10) ,p16–17. At :https://doi.org/10.1145/2983270
Kurbalija, J. 2013. E-participation: opportunities and challenges. Presenttation to the Diplo Foundation, Geneva. At ttps://www.un.org/
Le Miere, C. 2016. Maritime of Diplomacy in the 21st Century: Drivers and Challenges. London: Routledge.
Manor, I and C Segev. 2015. ‘America’s selfie: How the US portrays itself on its social media accounts’. In C Bjola & M Holmes (eds), Digital diplomacy: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, 89–108.
Mazoni, J. 2017. ‘Big data in government: the challenges and opportunities.’ Government of the United Kingdom. At https://www.gov.uk/
McLellan, J M. 2017. ‘Sentiment analysis of real-time Twitter data’. CDC Digital Magazine, Spring/Summer 2017. At https://scalar.usc.edu/
Michaelsons. N.d. ‘Artificial Intelligence Law’. At https://www.michalsons.com/
Morgenthau, H J. 1946. ‘Diplomacy’. The Yale Law Journal, 55 (5), 1067–1080. https://doi.org/10.2307/792754
Nicolson, H. 1998. Diplomacy. Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Washington DC.
Wilson, Woodrow. Fourteen Points Speech of 1918. At http://www.ourdocuments.gov/
Otte, T G. 2004. ‘Old Diplomacy: Reflections on the Foreign Office before 1914’, https://doi.org/10.1080/1361946042000259297
Pilegaard, J. 2017. ‘Virtually virtual?: The new frontiers of diplomacy’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 12 (4) 316-336. At Brill https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341356 
Rawnsley, G D. 2016. ‘Introduction to international broadcasting and public diplomacy in the 21st century’. Media and Communications, 4 (2), 42-45. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i2.641
Reuters. 2011. ‘US “virtual embassy” blocked by Iran net censor’. At https://www.reuters.com/
Singer, P W. 2009. Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and 21st Century Conflict. New York, NY: Penguin.
Spry, J. 2020. ‘Will Russia deploy squads of robotic soldiers on the battlefield by 2025?’ SYFY Wire. At https://www.syfy.com/
Tavares, R. 2018. ‘International diplomacy needs an overhaul to stay relevant: Here’s why’. World Economic Forum. At https://www.weforum.org/
The Congressional Service Report. 2019. US Overseas Diplomatic Presence: Background and Issues for Congress. At https://fas.org/
The Royal Society. 2010. ‘New Frontiers of Science Diplomacy: Navigating the changing balance of power’. American Association for the Advancement of Science. At https://royalsociety.org/
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961.
Williams, R. 2021. ‘The implications of the fourth industrial revolution for diplomacy’. Masters Dissertation, University of Johannesburg. Available at https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/
Wisskerchen, G et al. 2017. Artificial Intelligence and its Impact on the Workplace. International Bar Association (IBA). Global Employment Institute.
World Economic Forum. 2019. ‘Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution’, Network for Global Technology Governance. At https://www.weforum.org/