Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet

Share:

How to Cite

Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v21i1.1824
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 24, 2022
  • Published: October 31, 2022

Abstract

This article argues that new media often get involved in struggles for new rights. The
nascent book was involved in the struggle for religious freedom, the press has been
engaged in the struggle for fairer political regimes and the Internet is used today as
an instrument for the advocacy of new liberties: the freedoms of intimacy. Communities
and individuals seek to gain rights related to the needs and preferences derived from
their self-identity. This article shows that the Internet is best suited to dealing with
issues associated with the self and intimacy than are other media. Taking the example
of sexual minorities who use cyberspace as an alternative public sphere, it argues that
it is particularly well adapted to two key practices that are essential to communitybuilding
and that can only take place in the public sphere: self-definition and political
mobilization. The article also shows how public authorities have always tried to censor new media
when used by minorities to demand new rights. It argues that censorship has become
increasingly efficient and that today's new media face a new means of censorship in
technology. The article illustrates the case with the rating and filtering software used
to censor cyberspace. Finally, it claims that the fight for new rights is part of the
process of individualization inherent to modernity.

References

  1. Androunas, E. (1993) Soviet Media in Transition. Westport: Praeger.
  2. Bauman, Z. (2001) The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity.
  3. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards o New Modernity. London: Sage.
  4. Bell, D. (2001) An Introduction to Cybercultures. London: Routledge.
  5. Berners-Lee, T. and M. Fischetti (2000) Weaving the Web: The Past, Present and Future of the World Wide Web by its Inventor. London: Texere.
  6. Cabanis, A. (1975) La Presse sous le consulat et /'empire (1799-1814). Paris: Societe des etudes robespierristes.
  7. Castells, M. (2001) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Chalaby, J. (1998a) 'A Charismatic Leader's Use of the Media: De Gaulle and Television', The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(4): 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X98003004006
  9. Chalaby, J. (1998b) 'The Media and the Formation of the Public Sphere in the New Independent States', Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 11 (1 ): 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.1998.9968552
  10. Dominick, J.R. (1999) Who Do You Think You Are? Personal Home pages and Self-Presentation on the World Wide Web', Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(4): 646-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909907600403
  11. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  12. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Giddens, A. (1992) The Tronformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge. Polity Press.
  14. Grendler, P.F. (1977) The Roman Inquisition and the Venetian Press, 1540-1605. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  15. Harrison, S. (1974) Poor Men's Guardian: A Record of the Struggles for a Democratic Newspaper Press, 1763-1973. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
  16. Hollis, P. (1970) The Pauper Press: A Study in Working-Class Radicalism of the 1830s. London: Oxford University Press.
  17. Kamen, H. (1985) Inquisition and Society in Spain. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  18. Lange, Y. (1997) Media in the CIS: A Study of the Political, Legislative and Socio-Economic Framework. Dusseldorf: European Institute for the Media.
  19. Loades, D. (1991) Politics, Censorship and the English Reformation. London: Pinter.
  20. Lunt, P. (2001) 'Springer!: An Emotional Public Sphere', Inaugural International Media Conference - Global Village or Global Image? London: British Film Institute.
  21. Mue, N. (1999) 'Press freedom's changing legal regime: Still a dangerous landscape', Rhodes Journalism Review, 18, December: 8-9, 61.
  22. UNESCO (1996) Basic Texts in Communication, 1989-1995. Paris: UNESCO.
  23. Pryliuk, R. (1993) 'Mass Media Pluralism as a Condition of Civil Society', pp. 273-86 in 0. Manaev and R. Pryliuk (eds) Media in Transition: From Totalitarianism to Democracy. Kiev: Abris.
  24. Retat, P. (1989) La Revolution du journal, 1788-1794. Paris: CNRS.
  25. Slater, D. (1998) 'Trading sexpics on IRC: embodiment and authenticity on the Internet', Body & Society, 4: 91-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X98004004005
  26. Slevin, J. (2000) The Internet and Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  27. Thompson, J.B. (1995) The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  28. Weeks, J. (1985) Sexuality and its Discontents: Meanings, Myths & Modern Sexualities. London: Routledge.
  29. Weeks, J. (1986) Sexuality. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203992227
  30. Wiener, J.H. (1969) The War of the Unstamped: The Movement to Repeal the Bn"tish Newspaper Tax, 1830-1836. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  31. Wakeford, N. (2000) 'Cyberqueer', pp. 403-15 in D. Bell and B. M. Kennedy (eds) The Cybercultures reader. London: Routledge.
  32. Woodland, R. (2000) 'Queer spaces, modem boys and pagan statues: Gay/lesbian identity and the construction of cyberspace', pp. 416-31 in D. Bell and B. M. Kennedy (eds) The Cybercultures reader. London: Routledge.
How to Cite
Freedoms of intimacy and the Internet. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v21i1.1824

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate