Driving political issues with political brand storytelling on social media: an online brand persona perspective


Numerous South African political parties have a social media presence to create more awareness around the political issues which they stand for, and thus to attract more voters. Nowadays political parties act as political brands and adopt brand strategies to gain a competitive advantage over opposition parties. This article proposes adopting a social identity theory as a novel approach to how political brands could drive political issues on social media. It is further suggested that due to the complexity of the South African political scene, more attention could be paid to how political brands could leverage political brand stories in conjunction with an online political brand persona on social media to position themselves in a chaotic online political space. To test this, semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with communication professionals in South African public relations agencies who were responsible for creating content for political parties’ Facebook and Twitter accounts. Four themes that became evident in the data collectively indicate that political brands will successfully drive political issues on social media only when they are able to connect emotionally with the political consumer. In this regard, an online political brand persona may be critical in not only eliciting an emotional reaction from political consumers, but also establishing a long-term connection with them based on how credible the political brand is in terms of what they care about and their ability to solve issues.


  1. Aaker, D.A. (1996). Measuring brand equity. California Management Review, 38(3): 102-120. doi:10.2307/41165845
  2. Ahlin, E.M. (2019). Semi-structured interviews with expert practitioners: Their validity and significant contribution to translational research. In SAGE Research Methods Cases. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526466037
  3. Ailawadi, K.L., Lehmann, D.R. & Neslin, S.A. (2003). Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 67(10): 1-17.
  4. Armannsdottir, G., Carnell, S. & Pich, C. (2020). Exploring personal political brands of Iceland’s parliamentarians. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(1-2): 74-106.
  5. Aurini, J., Heath, M. & Howells, S. (2016). The how to of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  6. Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. (2018). The practice of social research. South Africa: Oxford University Press.
  7. Bennett, W.L. & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68: 243-253. doi:10.1093/joc/jqx017
  8. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77-101.
  9. Braunstein, R. (2012). Storytelling in liberal religious advocacy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1): 110-127.
  10. Campbell, V. & Lee, B. (2016). Party branding: A case study of online political posters. In Political Marketing and the 2015 UK General Election. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  12. Cosgrove, K.M. (2012). Political branding in the modern age: effective strategies, tools and techniques. In Routledge Handbook of Political Marketing, 122-138. Edited by J. Lees-Marshment. London: Routledge.
  13. De Chernatony, L. & McDonald, M.H. (2002). Creating powerful brands in consumer, service, and industrial markets. Oxford: Routledge.
  14. Du Plooy-Cilliers, F. (2014). Research paradigm and traditions. In: Research matters, 18-35. Edited by F du Plooy-Cilliers, C Davids & R.M Bezuidenhout. Cape Town: Juta.
  15. Engelbrecht, R. & Ngcongo, M. (2018). Storytelling for social media. In: Connect: writing for online audiences, 206-230. Edited by M. Pritchard & K. Sitto. Cape Town: Juta.
  16. Fine, G.A. (2000). John Brown’s body: Elites, heroic embodiment, and the legitimation of political violence. Social Problems, 46(2): 225-249.
  17. Friese, S. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. 3rd edition. California: Sage Publications.
  18. Gilbert, K. (2017). A simple tool to guide tone of voice. London: Domain 7.
  19. Green, A. (2009). Comunicarea eficientă în relațiile publice, Polirom, Iași.
  20. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5): e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
  21. Heersink, B. (2021). Examining Democratic and Republican National Committee Party Branding Activity, 1953–2012. Perspectives on Politics, pp.1-18.
  22. Henneberg, S.C. & O’Shaughnessy, N. (2007). Theory and concept development in political marketing: Issues and an agenda. Journal of Political Marketing, 6(2/3): 5-32. doi:10.1300/J199v06n02_02
  23. Jain, V., Chawla, M., Ganesh, B.E. & Pich, C. (2018). Exploring and consolidating the brand personality elements of the political leader. Spanish Journal of Marketing, 22(3): 297-320. doi:10.1108/SMJE-03-2018-0010
  24. Jain, V., Pich, C, Ganesh, B.E. & Armannsdottir, G. (2017). Structured abstract: Comprehending political branding and brand image of the BJP in India. In: Creating marketing magic and innovative future marketing trends: proceedings of the 2016 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) annual conference, 1307-1313. Edited by M. Stieler. Cham: Springer.
  25. Kane, A. (2000). Narratives of nationalism: Constructing Irish national identity during the Land War, 1879–82. National Identities, 2(3): 245-264.
  26. Kornberger, M. (2010). Brand society: how brands transform management and lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Korstjens, I. & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing, European Journal of General Practice, 24(1): 120-124. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
  28. Lees-Marshment, J. (2014). Political marketing: Principles and applications. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
  29. Lees-Marshment, J. (2019). Marketing scholars and political marketing: The pragmatic and principled reasons for why marketing academics should research the use of marketing in the political arena. Customer Needs and Solutions, 6(3-4): 41-48.
  30. Le Roux, C. & Du Plessis, C. (2014). An exploratory Q study of corporate brand identity elements governing corporate brand image formation. South African Business Review, 18(3): 119-141. doi:10500/18215
  31. Leslie, A. (2015). How stories argue: The deep roots of storytelling in political rhetoric. Detroit, 11(1): 66-84. doi:10.1858857838
  32. Maiangwa, B. & Byrne, S. (2015). Peacebuilding and reconciliation through storytelling in Northern Ireland and the border counties of the Republic of Ireland. Storytelling, Self, Society, 11(1): 85-110.
  33. Maree, K. & Pietersen, J. (2014). The quantitative research approach. In: First steps in research, 144-148. Edited by K. Maree. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
  34. Maree, K. & van der Westhuizen, C. (2014). Planning a research proposal. In: First steps in research, 24-45. Edited by K Maree. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
  35. Mensah, K. (2016). Political brand architecture: Towards a new conceptualisation of political branding in an emerging democracy. African Journalism Studies, 37(3): 61-84. doi:10.1080/23743670.2016.1220401
  36. Milewicz, C. & Milewicz, M. (2015). The branding of candidates and parties: The U.S. news media and the legitimization of a new political term. Journal of Political Marketing, 13(4): 233-263. doi:10.1080/15377857.2014.990836
  37. Needham, C. & Smith, G. (2015). Introduction: Political branding. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1-2): 1-6. doi:10.1080/15377857.2014.990929
  38. Narteh, B., Mensah, K. & Nyanzu, J. (2017). Political party branding and voter choice in Ghana, 69-96. In: Political marketing and management in Ghana: a new architecture, edited by K Mensah. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan:
  39. Oh, T.T., Keller, K.L., Neslin, S.A., Reibstein, D.J. & Lehmann, D.R. (2020).The past, present, and future of brand research. Marketing Letters: A Journal of Research in Marketing, 31: 151–162. doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09524-w
  40. Pich, C. & Armannsdottir, G. (2022). Political Brand Identity and Image: Manifestations, Challenges and Tensions. In Political Branding in Turbulent times (pp. 9-32). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  41. Pich, C. & Dean, D. (2015). Political branding: Sense of identity or identity crisis? An investigation of the transfer potential of the brand identity prism to the UK Conservative Party. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(11-12): 1353-1378.
  42. Pich, C. & Newman, B.I. (2020). Evolution of political branding: Typologies, diverse settings and future research. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(1-2): 3-14.
  43. Petrocik, J.R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3): 825-850.
  44. Polletta, F. (2015). Characters in political storytelling. Storytelling, Self, Society, 11(1): 34-55. doi:10.13110/storeselfsoci11.1.0034
  45. Schwab, S. (2011). Social media explorer. [O]. Available: https://socialmediaexplorer. com/content-sections/tools-and-tips/finding-your-brand-voice/ Accessed on June 30, 2019.
  46. Seeberg, H.B. (2022). First avoidance, then engagement: Political parties’ issue competition in the electoral cycle. Party Politics, 28(2): 284-293.
  47. Stets, J.E. & Burke, P.J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3): 224-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870
  48. Stewart, J. (2012). Fiction over facts: How competing narrative forms explain policy in a new immigration destination. Sociological Forum, 27(3): 591-616.
  49. Stubager, R. (2018). What is issue ownership and how should we measure it? Political Behaviour, 40(2): 345-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9403-y
  50. Swart, C. (2020). Using a qualitative research approach in social media research. In: Social Media Research, 107-134. Edited by C. du Plessis & A.A. Satar. Cape Town: Juta.
  51. Tajfel, H. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5: 5-34.
  52. Terblanche, N.S. (2011). You cannot run or hide from social media – ask a politician. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(3): 156-167.
  53. Turner, J.C. & Tajfel, H. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 7-24.
  54. Van Camp, C. (2018). Issue ownership as a determinant of political parties’ media coverage. Communications 43(1): 25-45. doi:10.1515/commun-2017-0029
  55. Van Wyk, H. (2021). A conceptual framework for an online political brand persona from a social media-based political brand storytelling perspective (Doctoral dissertation: University of South Africa).
  56. Walgrave, S., Van Camp, K, Lefevere, J. & Tresch, A. (2015). Measuring issue ownership with survey questions: A question wording experiment. Electoral Studies, 42: 290-299.
How to Cite
van Wyk, H., & Du Plessis , C. (2023). Driving political issues with political brand storytelling on social media: an online brand persona perspective. Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 42(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v42i1.2182

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate