The (im)possibility of communication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Articles
- Submited: October 21, 2022
-
Published: October 24, 2022
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of communication from a perspective opened up by
Derrida’s reading of Joyce’s Ulysses in terms of the relationship between the notion of
the ‘yes’ or iterability, the signature of (and counter-signature to) a text and two types
of laughter. It is shown that the same aporia that confronts the reader of Ulysses, namely
that a counter-signature to the text is possible as a novel event and is simultaneously
not possible as such, faces participants in communication: communication is and is not
possible. The work of Hardt and Negri is further used to add another dimension to this
aporia, this time focusing on the paradox of living in a so-called ‘age of communication’,
while certain events of resistance to the agencies of global hegemony are incommunicable.
Article Metrics Graph
References
- BENVENUTO, B. & KENNEDY, R. 1986. The works of Jacques Lacan. An introduction. London : Free Association Books.
- BRAND, A. 1990. The force of reason. An introduction to Habermas’ theory of communicative action. London : Allen & Unwin.
- CAPUTO, J. 1997. Deconstruction in a nutshell. New York : Fordham University Press.
- DERRIDA, J. 1978. From restricted to general economy. A Hegelianism without reserve. (In Writing and difference. Bass, A. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, pp.251-277).
- DERRIDA, J. 1998. For the love of Lacan. (In Resistances of Psychoanalysis. Tr. Kamuf, P., et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp.39-69). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616707-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616707-003
- DERRIDA, J. 1991. From: Ulysses Gramophone: Hear say Yes in Joyce. Tr. Kendall, T., & Benstock, S. (In Kamuf, P. ed. A Derrida reader: Between the blinds. New York : Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp.571-598).
- GADAMER, H.G. 1982. Truth and method. New York : Crossroad.
- HARDT, M. & NEGRI, A. 2001. Empire. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038325
- HARVEY, D. 1990. The condition of postmodernity. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
- HEIDEGGER, M. 1978. Being and time. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
- HURST, A. 2003. Helen and Heidegger: Disabled Dasein, language and others. South African Journal of Philosophy (SAJP), 22(1):97-112. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajpem.v22i1.31363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajpem.v22i1.31363
- HURST, A. & OLIVIER, B. 1997. Introduction to critical practice. South African Journal of Higher Education, 11(2):157-165.
- LEE, J.S. 1990. Jacques Lacan. Amherst : University of Massachusetts Press.
- LYOTARD, J.F. 1988. The differend. Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
- OLIVIER, B. 1998. Freud and Lyotard on civilization. SAJP, 17(2):126-141.
- OLIVIER, B. 2002. Kieslowski’s Three Colours Blue, White and Red: The colours of life. South African Journal of Art History, 17:120-139.
- OLIVIER, B. 2002a. Postmodern cinema and postmodern culture: Information-communication, otherness and history in Wenders’s Himmel über Berlin (Wings of desire). (In Projections: Philosophical themes on film. Port Elizabeth : University of Port Elizabeth Publications.
- NORRIS, C. 1989. Derrida. Fontana Modern Masters. London : Fontana.
