Die klassieke retoriek as basis vir hedendaagse openbare spraakkommunikasieleerinhoude

Share:

How to Cite

Die klassieke retoriek as basis vir hedendaagse openbare spraakkommunikasieleerinhoude. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 8(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v8i2.2050
  • Articles
  • Submited: November 9, 2022
  • Published: November 10, 2022

Abstract

This article explores a number of characteristics of the conceptual structure and teaching of classical rhetoric, and indicates that the subject contents of rhetoric were based at the outset on certain principles and con texts of public communication events in the world in which people lived. This approach to the identification of the subject contents of oral communication has not changed substantially over time, nor have the basic categories by which public communication was originally distinguished as a field of study. What has changed considerably, is the human concept of the fundamental nature and scope of communication principles and contexts, the perspectives from which it is approached and its ontological and philosophical basis. The ordering and systemisation of these are naturally expressed in a more comprehensive and scientific conceptual system than was the case in the classical era. In order to gain a thorough understanding of the complex system, however, It is necessary to study its classical rhetorical roots.

References

  1. Berko, R.M., Wolvin, A.D. & Wolvin, D.R. (1985). Communicating: A social and career focus. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  2. Bettinghaus, E.P & Cody, M.J. (1987). Persuasive communication. New York Holt, Rinehart &
  3. Winston. Bittner, JR. (1985). Fundamentals of communication .Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Blankenship, J. (1974). Selected readings in speech communication. Encino, California: Dickenson.
  5. Book, C.L. (1980). Human communication: Principles, contexts and skills. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  6. Caplan, H. (Trans) (1977). Pseudo-Cicero. Rhetorica ad C. Herennium. London: William Heineman.
  7. Carrino, E.M.D. (1959). Conceptions of disposition ancient rhetoric Michigan: University Microfilms International.
  8. Chadwick, H. (Trans.) (1953). Origenes, Contra Celsum. Cambridge: University Press.
  9. Clark, D.L. (1977). Rhetoric in Greco-Roman education. Westpart, Connecticut Greenwood Press.
  10. Conen, E. (1983). Speaking the speech. New York: Rinehart & Winston.Holt,
  11. Corbett E PJ. (1965). Classical rhetoric for the modernstudent. New York: Oxford University Press. De
  12. Kerckhove, D. (1983). Classical rhetoric and communication theory. Communication: 7:181-200 De
  13. Vito, JA (1974). The encoding of speech and writing In Blankenship (1974) 159-165
  14. De Wet, JC (1988). The art of persuasive communication Johannesburg: Juta. Dixon, P (1971) Rhetoric. London: Methuen
  15. Enninger, D, Gronbeck, B. & Monroe, A.H. (1980) Prin Ehninger, D., Gronbeck, B. & Monroe, A.H. (1980). Principles of speech communication. Glenview, Illinois:Scott, Foresman & Company.
  16. Fox, J. (1969). The rhetorical tradition in French literature of the later Middle Ages. Exeter: University of Exeter
  17. Galvin, K.M., Cooper, PJ. & Gordon, J.M. (1988). The basics of speech: Learning to be a competent communicator Lincolnwood, Illinois: NTC.
  18. Greer, R.A. (Trans) (1979). Origenes. An exhortation to martyrdom, prayer first principles: Book IV, Prologue to the commentary on the song of songs, Homily XXVII on numbers. London: SPCK.
  19. Gruner, CR (1983). Plain public speaking. New York: Macmillan.
  20. Halm, E. (Ed.) (1964). Rhetores Latini Minores. Frankfurt: Minerwa, GMBH.
  21. Hamilton. W. (Trans) (1977). Plato. Phaedrus and the seventh and eighth letters. New York: Penguin.
  22. Hamilton. W. (Trans.) (1982) Plato. Gorgias. Harmonds worth: Penguin.
  23. Hendrickson, G.L. (Trans.) (1939). Cicero. Orator Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  24. Hubbell. H.M. (Trans.) (1949). Cicero. De Inventione; De Optima Genere Oratorium; Topica. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  25. Hunt GT. (1981). Public speaking. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  26. Jabusch, D.M. (1985). Public speaking. A transactional approach Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  27. Jansen, E.M. (1983). Plato's concept of dialogue in Gorgias and Phaedrus. Pretoria Academica
  28. Jones, LW. (Ed.) (1946). An introduction to divine and human readings by Cassiodorus Senator New York. Columbia University Press
  29. Kennedy, G.A (1980) Classical rhetoric and its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times London: Croom Helm
  30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1770910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1770910
  31. Leeman, A.D. (1981). Het rhetorich onderwijs in de Oud heid; Zijn inhoud, zijn doel, zijn didactiek. Lampas, 14(3):179- 191.
  32. Leff, M.C. (1972). The frozen image: Sulpicius Victor and the ancient rhetorical tradition. Los Angeles: University Microfilms International.
  33. Lilla, S.R.C. (1971). Clement of Alexandria. A study in Christian Platonism and Gnosticism. London: Oxford University Press.
  34. Lindsay. W.M. (Ed.) (1911). Isodorus. Etymologiae. Ox ford: Clarendon Press. Marrou, H.I. (1956). A history of education in antiquity. (Translated by G. Lamb). New York: Sheed & Ward.
  35. Myers, V. & Herndon, R. T. (1988). Dynamics of speech. Lincolnwood, Illinois: National Textbook Company. Lincolnwood, Illinois: National TextbooK Company
  36. Norlin. G. (Trans.) (1956). Isocrates. Writings. Vol. II. London: William Heineman.
  37. Ochs, D.J. (1966). The tradition of the classical doctrines of rhetorical topoi lowa: University Microfilms International.
  38. Osborn, M. (1982). Speaking in public. Boston: Hough ton Mifflin,
  39. Poulakos, J. (1984). Rhetoric, the Sophists, and the pos sible. Communication Monographs, 51(3):215-226.
  40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390196
  41. Rackham. H. (Trans). (1942). Cicero. De Oratore III; De Fato; Paradoxa Stoicorum; De Partitione Oratoria. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  42. Robertson, DW, Jr. (Trans.) (1977). Augustine On Christian doctrine Indianapolis, Indiana:
  43. Bobbs-Merrill. Ross, W.D. (Ed.) (1971). The works of Anstotle Volume XI. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  44. Sider, R.D. (1971). Ancient rhetoric and the art of Tertulian. London: Oxford University Press.
  45. Stump, E. (Ed. and trans.) (1978). Boethius's De Topicis Differentiis Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  46. Sutton, E.W. & Rackham, H. (Trans.) (1942). Cicero. De Oratore (Books and II). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  47. Terblanche, FH. (1987). Die pre-Renaissance-retoriek as grondslag vir 'n leerinhoudgerigte benadering tot hedendaagse spraakkommunikasie. Ongepubliseer de D.Phil-proefskrif. Bloemfontein: Universiteit van die Oranje Vrystaat.
  48. Timothy, H.B. (1973) The early Christian apologists and Greek philosophy Assen: Van Gorcum.
  49. Van Schoor, M. (1986). Wat is kommunikasie? Pretoria:Van Schaik.
  50. Watson, J.S. (Trans) (1891). Quintilian's institutes of oratory: Or, education of an orator, in twelve books, London: George Bell & Sons.
  51. Watson, J.S. (Trans.) (1892). Quintilian's institutes of oratory: Or, education of an orator, in twelve books. London: George Bell & Sons. White, E. (1984). Basic Public speaking. New York:Macmillan.
  52. Whitman, R.F. & Boase, PH. (1983) Speech communication, New York: Macmillan
How to Cite
Die klassieke retoriek as basis vir hedendaagse openbare spraakkommunikasieleerinhoude. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 8(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v8i2.2050

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate