Advance Search

Corporate social responsibility communication for both business and societal sustainability in ten South African organisations

Louise Bezuidenhout
North West University
Elbe Kloppers
North West University
Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2023 Louise Bezuidenhout Bezuidenhout, Elbe Kloppers

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Share:

How to Cite

Corporate social responsibility communication for both business and societal sustainability in ten South African organisations. (2023). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 42(2), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v42i2.1538
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 7, 2022
  • Published: December 9, 2023

Abstract

In the context of South Africa as a developing country, we argue that CSR communication should contribute to both business sustainability and the empowerment of society for societal sustainability. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of senior South African communication practitioners regarding sustainability and the practice of CSR communication to support dual sustainability. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten senior communication practitioners responsible for CSR and/or CSR communication in ten national and international organisations across South Africa. Our findings revealed that although all practitioners recognised sustainability as the purpose of CSR, business sustainability was prioritised, while societal sustainability has only been supported. CSR communication was primarily used to enhance business sustainability by portraying the company as a responsible corporate citizen through corporate communication efforts to enhance its reputation. This is attributed to the fact that the current CSR communication theory is based on corporate communication, which prioritises business objectives.
We contend that a more comprehensive theoretical framework, including principles of development communication, would enable CSR communication to significantly contribute to societal sustainability.

PDF
PDF

Article Metrics Graph

Article Views | PDF Downloads
Chart Graph | Range Graph

References

  1. Bester, V. & Groenewald, L. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and artisanal mining: Towards a fresh South African perspective. Resources Policy, 72:1-10.
  2. Blagov, Y.E. & Petrova-Savchenko, A.A. (2021). The transformation of corporate sustainability model in the context of achieving the UN SDGs: Evidence from leading Russian companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 21(2):307-321.
  3. Carrol, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Towards the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4):39-48.
  4. Coy, D., Malekpour, S., Saeri, A.K. & Dargaville, R. (2021). Rethinking community empowerment in the energy transformation: A critical review of the definitions, drivers and outcomes. Energy Research & Social Science, 72:1-13.
  5. Delannon, N. & Raufflet, E. (2021). Impeding corporate social responsibility: Revisiting the role of government in shaping business – marginalized local community relations. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 30:470-484.
  6. Du Plooy, G.M. (2009). Communication Research: Techniques, Methods and Applications. 2nd ed. Cape Town: Juta.
  7. ElAlfy, A., Palaschuk, N., El-Bassiouny, D., Wilson, J. & Weber, O. (2020). Scoping the evolution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) research in the sustainable development goals (SDGs) era. Sustainability, 12:5544. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5544/htm
  8. Elving, W.J.L., Golob, U., Podnar, K., Ellerup-Nielsen, A. & Thomson, C. (2015). The bad, the ugly and the good: New challenges for CSR communication. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 20:118-127.
  9. Golob, U., Verk, N., Ellerup-Nielsen, A., Thomsen, C., Elving, W. & Podnar, K. (2017). The communicative stance of CSR: Reflections on the value of CSR communication. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 22(2):166-177.
  10. GRI, UNGC & WBCSD. (2015). SDG compass: The guide for business action on the SDGs. Available from: https://www.local2030.org/library/124/SDG-Compass-The-guide-for-business-action-on-the-SDGs.pdf
  11. Grunig, J.E. & Grunig, L.A. (2000). Public relations in strategic management and strategic management of public relations: Theory and evidence from the IABC Excellence project. Journalism Studies, 1(2):303-321.
  12. Heath, R.L. & Waymer, D. (2017). Unlocking corporate social responsibility. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 22(2):192-208.
  13. Hovring, C.M. (2017a). Corporate social responsibility as shared value creation: Toward a communicative approach. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 22(2):239-256.
  14. Hovring, C.M. (2017b). Caught in a communicative catch-22? Translating the notion of CSR as shared value creation in a Danish CSR frontrunner. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(4):369-381.
  15. Huesca, R. (2008). Tracing the history of participatory communication approaches to development: A critical appraisal. In Communication for Development and Social Change, pp. 180-198. Edited by Servaes, J. Los Angeles: Sage.
  16. Institute of Directors (2016). King report of corporate governance for South Africa. Parklands: IoD. Available from: Publications-King IV – The Institute of Directors in South Africa NPC (iodsa.co.za).
  17. International Organization for Standardization (2010). ISO 26 000: Guidance on Social Responsibility. Geneva: ISO. Available from: ISO - ISO 26000 — Social responsibility.
  18. IoD: See Institute of Directors.
  19. ISO: See International Organization for Standardization.
  20. Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1):213-231.
  21. Jamali, D. & Carroll, A. (2017). Capturing advances in CSR: Developed versus developing country perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26:321-325.
  22. Jimena, J. (2008). The CSR: Another way to communicate. Canadian Mining Journal, Aug., 9.
  23. Kapoor, P.S., Balaji, M.S. & Jiang, Y. (2021). Effectiveness of sustainability communication on social media: Role of message appeal and message source. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(3):949-972.
  24. Kong, H.M. & Witmaier, A.K.E. (2021). Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research, 131:640-651.
  25. Lock, I., Seele, P. & Heath, L.R. (2016). Where grass has no roots: The concepts of “shared strategic communication” as an answer to unethical astroturf lobbying. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(2):87-100.
  26. McAnany, E.G. (2012). Saving the World: A Brief History of Communication for Development and Social Change. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  27. Mefalopulos, P. (2008). Development Communication Sourcebook: Broadening the Boundaries of Communication. Washington DC: The World Bank. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7522-8
  28. Mefalopulos, P. & Grenna, L. (2004). Promoting sustainable development through strategic communication. In Communication Protected Areas: Commission on Education and Communication, pp. 24-31. Edited by Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E. & Goldstein, W. Cambridge: World Conservation Union.
  29. Melkote, S.R. (1996). Communication for Development in the Third World: Theory and Practice. New Deli: Sage.
  30. Mindell, R. (2022). 7 Best practices for creating a CSR strategy. Available from: https://blog.submittable.com/csr-strategy/
  31. Munro, V. (2013). Stakeholder preferences for particular corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and social initiatives (SIs): CSR initiatives to assist corporate strategy in emerging and frontier markets. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 51:72-106.
  32. Nair, K.S. & White, S.A. (1993). The development communication process: A reconceptualization. In Perspectives in Development Communication, 47-70. Edited by Nair, K.S. & White, S.A. New Deli: Sage.
  33. Newig, J., Schulz, D., Fischer, D., Hetze, K., Noran, L., Ludecke, G. & Rieckman, M. (2013). Communication regarding sustainability: Conceptual perspectives and exploration of societal subsystems. Sustainability, 5(7):2976-2990.
  34. Podnar, K. (2008). Communicating corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications, 4(2):75-81.
  35. Porter, M.E. & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12):78-92.
  36. Porter, M.E. & Kramer, M.R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2):62-77.
  37. Rashed, A.H. & Shah, A. (2021). The role of the private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3):2931-2948.
  38. Saber, M. & Weber, A. (2019). How do supermarkets and discounters communicate about sustainability? A comparative analysis of sustainability reports and in-store communication. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47(11):1181-1202.
  39. SANS. (2010). SANS26000: Guidance on Social Responsibility. Available from: https://store.sabs.co.za/catalog/product/view/_ignore_category/1/id/223786/s/sans-26000-2010-ed-1-00/
  40. Schönherr, N., Findler, F. & Martinuzzi, A. (2017). Exploring the interface of CSR and the sustainable development goals. Transnational Corporations, 24(3):33-47.
  41. Servaes, J. (1995). Towards a new perspective for whom and for what? Communication, 21(1):39-45.
  42. Servaes, J. & Malikhao, P. (2008). Development communication approaches in an international perspective. In Communication for Development and Social Change, pp. 158-179. Edited by Servaes, J.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  43. South Africa (2008). Companies Act 71 of 2008. Available from https://www.gov.za/documents/companies-act
  44. Tae, H.L. (2017). The status of corporate social responsibility research in public relations: A content analysis of published articles in eleven scholarly journals from 1980 – 2015. Public Relations Review, 43(10):211-218.
  45. Tao, W. & Wilson, C. (2016). The impact of corporate communication of company evaluation: Examining the message effects of CSR, corporate ability and hybrid strategies. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(5):426-444.
  46. UN (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. Available from: Sustainable Development Goals | United Nations Development Programme (undp.org)
  47. UN (2019a). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available from: 2030_agenda_for_sustainable_development_web.pdf (un.org)
  48. UN (2019b). Voluntary nation review reports. Available from: Empowering people and ensuring inclusiveness and equality for all lead to greater sustainable development | ESCAP (unescap.org)
  49. UNDP (2011). Communication for development. Strengthening the effectiveness of the United Nations. Available from: c4d-effectiveness of UN-EN.pdf
  50. UNICEF (2017). Communication for development. Applying social and behavioural science to promote the adoption and maintenance of positive behaviours. Available from: Communication for Development | UNICEF Georgia.
  51. Verk, N., Golob, U. & Podnar, K. (2021). A dynamic review of the emergence of corporate social responsibility communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 168:491-515.
  52. Voltan, A., Hervieus, C. & Mills, A. (2017). Examining the win-win proposition of shared value across contexts: Implications for future application. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26:347-368.
  53. World Bank (2008) see Mefalopulos, P. (2008).
  54. Zieita, Y. (2017). Understanding CSR communication contexts based on the stakeholder theory. Argumentum: Journal of The Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, 15(2):37-51.
How to Cite
Corporate social responsibility communication for both business and societal sustainability in ten South African organisations. (2023). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 42(2), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v42i2.1538

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
    • Clarivate