Emotional political advertising: a South African case study

a South African case study

Share:

How to Cite

Emotional political advertising: a South African case study. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 22(1), 187 = 211. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v22i1.1804
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 22, 2022
  • Published: October 24, 2022

Abstract

The real possibility exists that the overemphasis of a party’s image in advertisements
could lead to the neglect of important political information for voters. Emotional and
negative advertisements could therefore be detrimental to any young democracy.
Against this background this article investigates the use of emotional persuasive appeals
and negative messages in political newspaper advertisements in the North-West Province
during South Africa's general elections in 1999.
The results indicate that although all the parties in the study used emotional appeals,
they mostly connected them to a policy issue. However, these policy issues were not
elaborated on. The opposition parties mostly used appeals of uncertainty, fear and rage.
The ruling party in the province (the ANC) concentrated on appeals of hope and
achievement.
The ANC virtually abstained from using negative messages, while the DP, the NNP and
the FF "attacked" one another in order to emphasise their differences. They did not harm
the sustainability of the South African democracy as such, but they also did very little
to promote it actively through their media advertisements.

References

  1. ABBE, O.G. & HERNSON, P.S. 2000. Going negative does not always mean getting ahead in elections. Campaigns and Elections, 21(1):77-79.
  2. ANSOLABEHERE, S. & IYENGAR, S. 1995. Going negative: how political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York : MacMillan.
  3. ANSOLABEHERE, S., IYENGAR, S., SIMON, A. & VALENTINO, N. 1994. Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review, 88(4):829-838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2082710
  4. BENOIT, W.L. & PIER, P.M. 1997. A functional approach to televised political spots: acclaiming, attacking, defending. Communication Quarterly, 45(1):1-21, Winter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379709370041
  5. BERELSON, B. 1952. Content analysis in communication research. Belmont : Wadsworth.
  6. BRAINS, C.L. & WATTENBERG, M.P. 1996. Campaign issue knowledge and salience: comparing reception from TV commercial, TV news and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science, 40 (1):172-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111699
  7. Buckingham, D. 1997. News media, political socialization and popular citizenship: towards a new agenda. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14(4):344-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039709367023
  8. DEVLIN, L.P. 1993. Contrasts in presidential campaign commercials of 1992. Behavioral Scientist, 37(2):272-291, Nov/Dec. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764293037002015
  9. ESSER, F., REINMANN, C. & FAN, D. 2000. Spin doctoring in British and German election campaigns: How DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323100015002003
  10. the press is being confronted with a new quality of political PR. European Journal of Communication, 15(2):209-240, Jun.
  11. FINKEL, S.W. & GEER, J.G. 1998. A spot check: casting doubt on the demobilizing effects of attack advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2):573-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2991771
  12. GARRAMONE G.M., ATKIN, C.K., PINKLETON, B.E. & COLE, R.T. 1990. Effects of negative political advertising on the political process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34:299-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159009386744
  13. GUNSCH, M.A., BRONLOW, S.H. & HAYES, S.E. 2000. Differential linguistic content of various forms of political advertising. Journal of broadcasting and electronic media, 44(1):27-42, Winter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4401_3
  14. HODESS, R., TEDESCO, J.C. & KAID, L.L. 2000. British party election broadcasts. Harvard International journal of Press/Politics, 5(4):56-57, Aug. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X00005004004
  15. JOHNSON-CARTEE, K.S. & COPELAND, G.A. 1991. Negative political advertising coming of age. New Yersey: Laurence Erlbaum.
  16. JOHNSON-CARTEE, K.S. & COPELAND, G.A. 1997. Manipulation of the American voter – political campaign commercials. Westport : Praeger.
  17. KAHN, K.F. & KENNEY, P.J. 1999. A model of candidate evaluations in senate elections: the impact of campaign intensity. Journal of politics, 59(4), 1173-1205, Nov. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2998597
  18. KAID, L.L. & SANDERS, K.R. 1978. Political television commercials: an experimental study of type and length. Communication Research, 5(1):57-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027800500103
  19. KAID, L.L., & JOHNSTON, A. 1991. Negative versus positive television advertising in the US presidential campaigns 1960-1988. Journal of Communication, 413(3):53-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02323.x
  20. KAVANAGH, D. 1995. Election campaigning: the marketing of politics. Oxford : Blackwell.
  21. KERN, M. 1989. 30 Second politics: political advertising in the eighties. New York : Praeger.
  22. KOLODNY, R., THURBER, J.A. & DULIO, D.A. 2000. Producing negative ads: consultants review. Campaigns & Elections, 21(7):56-57, Aug.
  23. KOTLER, P. & KOTLER, N. 1999. Political marketing: generating effective candidates, campaigns and causes. (In: Newman, B.I. ed. 1999. Handbook of political marketing. London: Sage. p. 3-18).
  24. MARCUS, G.E. 1991. Emotions and politics: hot cognition and the rediscovery of passion. Social Science Information, 30(2):195-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901891030002001
  25. MARCUS, G.E. 2000. Emotions in politics. Annual Reviews in Political Science, 3(1):221-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221
  26. MARCUS,G.E. & MACKUEN, M.B. 1993. Anxiety, enthusiasm and the vote: the emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during the presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87(3):672-685, Sep. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2938743
  27. MAYER, W.G. 1996. In defence of negative campaigning. Political Science Quarterly, 111:437-455, Fall. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2151970
  28. NADEAU, R. & NIEMI, R. 1995. Emotions, issue importance and political learning. American Journal of Political Science, 21(7):558-560, Aug. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111644
  29. NEWMAN, B.I. 1994. The marketing of the President: political marketing as campaign strategy. London : Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326702
  30. PAGE, B.I. & SHAPIRO, R.Y. 1992. The rational public: fifty years of trends in America's policy preferences. Chicago : University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001
  31. RODDY, B.L. & GARRAMONE, G.M. 1988. Appeals and strategies of negative political advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 32(4):415-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158809386713
  32. PFAU, M. & PARROT, R. 1996. Persuasive campaigns. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  33. PINKLETON, B. 1989. The effects of negative comparative political advertising on candidate evaluations
  34. and advertising evaluations: an exploration. Journal of Advertising, 26(1):19-29.
  35. POPKIN, S.L. 1991. The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226772875.001.0001
  36. Chicago: University press.
  37. RAHN, W. & HIRSHORN, R.M. 1999. Political advertising and public mood: a study of children's political DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198550
  38. orientations. Political Communication, 16(4):387-407, Oct-Dec.
  39. SABATO, L.J. 1981. The rise of political consultants: new ways of winning elections. New York : Basic books.
  40. SALMORE, B.G. & SALMORE, S.A. 1989. Candidates, parties and campaigns: electoral politics in America. Washington : CQ press.
  41. SCAMMELL, M. 1995. Designer politics: how elections are won. London : MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23942-9
  42. SHER, R.K. 1997. The modern political campaign, bombast and the vitality of American politics. New York : Sharpe.
  43. STATISTICS SOUTH AFRICA. 1996. The people of South Africa: population cencus 1996. Report no 03-01-11 (1996).
  44. TAK, J., KAID, L.L. & LEE, S. 1997. A cross-cultural study of political advertising in the United States and Korea. Communication Research, 24(4):413-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365097024004005
  45. TRENT, J.S. & FRIEDENBERG, R.V. 1995. Political campaign communication: principles and practices. Westport : Praeger.
  46. WAY, B.M. & MASTERS, R.D. 1996. Emotion and cognition in political information processing. Journal of Communication, 46(3):48-66, Summer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01488.x
How to Cite
Emotional political advertising: a South African case study. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 22(1), 187 = 211. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v22i1.1804

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate