The 2022 Copyright Amendment Bill: Implications for the South African universities’ research economy

Keyan Tomaselli
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:26:"University of Johannesburg";}
Share:

How to Cite

The 2022 Copyright Amendment Bill: Implications for the South African universities’ research economy . (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 41(2), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i2.1479
  • Articles
  • Submited: September 15, 2022
  • Published: December 15, 2022

Abstract

The South African Copyright Amendment Bill of 2017 was passed in 2022. In justifying the weakening of copyright protections with regard to the educational arena, the Bill’s proponents have largely applied rhetorical discourses published in the popular media, also aggressively propagated at their public meetings. In contrast, the publishing industry has generated many hundreds of pages of economic impact studies supported by detailed legal arguments with reference to global treaties. My analysis assesses the different positions taken by the pro-Bill lobby, ReCreate, in comparison to the Copyright Coalition that questions the importation of an American fair use doctrine. The potential implications of the Bill for South African authors and artists operating in the educational environment are described. Since the object of study has been a moving target, and still was at the time of submission of this article, the conclusions that arise out of the ongoing debates are tentative – but prescient for the current conjuncture. The analysis relies on cross-referencing stakeholder submissions, newspaper articles and statements made by all parties to the discussion. In addition, a number of rejoinders were invited, which are published below. The study reveals the stark contradictions within emerging state policy relating to the creative industries in an era when information has economic value. 

References

  1. ANFASA (Academic and Non-fiction Authors Association pf South Africa) (2019a). A last word on the Copyright Amendment Bill. http://www.anfasa.org.za/a-last-word-on-the-copyright-amendment-bill/
  2. ANFASA. (2019b). Cui Bono? Who Benefits? The impact of the Copyright Amendment Bill on scholarly writing and knowledge production in South Africa. https://gallery.mailchimp.com/e9dc3c9df130a26b20b802af6/files/9ea03d00-dcd7-45c0-b81c-57abb5cc398e/ANFASA_Symposium_19_2_2019.pdf
  3. ASSAf (Academy of Science of South Africa) (2022). Copyright Amendment Bill Workshop Proceedings Report. [Online] Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2022/0078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2022/0078
  4. Dean, O.H. (2021). The Gift of Multiplication. Cape Town: Juta. https://juta.co.za/uploads/The_Gift_of_Multiplication_Essays_Amendment_Bill/
  5. Degen, J. (2021). The Copyright Amendment Bill: A Canadian experience. ANFASA Magazine, 5(4): 11-12.
  6. Department of Sport, Arts and Culture. (2022, May). Creating and Designing for Growth South Africa’s Creative Industry Masterplan to 2040. A Report of the South African Creative Industry Masterplan Project. Mimeo.
  7. Flynn. S. (2019). https://www.ip-watch.org/2019/03/21/south-africa-moves-forward-with-creator-rights-agenda/
  8. Flynn, S. & Palmedo, M. (2017). The User Rights Database: Measuring the Impact of Copyright Balance, Draft Paper, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property (available at: http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Flynn-and-Palmedo-v1.pdf). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082371
  9. Ford, G.S. (2017). The Vanishing Benefits of Fair Use: A Review of the Flynn- Palmedo Study on “User Rights” in Copyright Law, Perspectives, http://www.phoenix-center.org/perspectives/Perspective17-12Final.pdf
  10. Forere, M., Beiter, K.G., Fiil-Flynn, S.M., Klaaren, J., Ncube, C., Nwauche, E., Rens, A., Samtani, S. & Schonwetter, T. Joint academic opinion on South Africa’s copyright Amendment Bill (B-13B OF 2017) Posted by InfoJustice Eds. (May 10, 2021) Academic Resources, Domestic Legislation, Limitations and Exceptions. https://infojustice.org/archives/43156
  11. Hugenholtz, P.B. & Okediji, R. (March 7, 2012). Conceiving an international instrument on limitations and exceptions to copyright. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, 37: doi:10.2139/ssrn.2017629. S2CID 152366700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2017629
  12. Karaganis, J. (2018). (Ed.) Shadow Libraries: Access to knowledge in global higher education. IDRC: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11339.001.0001
  13. Karjiker, S. (2021). Should South Africa adopt Fair Use? Cutting through the rhetoric. Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg (TSAR), 2021-2: 240-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47348/TSAR/2021/i2a2
  14. Klaaren, J. (2015). The South African ‘Secrecy Act’: Democracy put to the test. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 48(3): 284-303. doi: 10.5771/0506-7286-2015-3-284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2015-3-284
  15. Le Pan (2016). Copyright in Canada: The damage caused by unfair interpretations of “Fair Use”. http://www.hilltimes.com/2016/04/06/unfair-interpretation-of-fair-use-damaging-publishing-industry/57277
  16. Merrett, C. (2006). The expropriation of intellectual capital and the political Economy of international academic publishing. Critical Arts, 20(1): 96-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040608557779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040608557779
  17. Moll, I. (2021). The Myth of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Theoria, https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2021.6816701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54223/uniwitwatersrand-10539-32846
  18. Muller, S.M. (2017) Academics as rent seekers: Distorted incentives in higher education, with reference to the South African case. International Journal of Educational Development, 52: 58-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.11.004
  19. Myburgh, A. (27 March, 2019). Rights for Creators or Dismantling Copyright? https://www.polity.org.za/article/rights-for-creators-or-dismantling-copyright-2019-03-27
  20. Myburgh, A. Advice on the Copyright Amendment Bill, No 13 of 2017, revised as of 3 September 2018 for the Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry. https://legalbrief.co.za/media/filestore/2018/10/andre_myburgh.pdf
  21. Myburgh, A. & Hollis, S. (2020). Controversial legislation derailed. South Africa’s Copyright Reform, August 2020, 2(7): 3-6.
  22. Nicolson, D.R. (September 15, 2022). New copyright bill will take South Africa into the 21st century at last. https://www.groundup.org.za/article/new-bill-will-remedy-many-evils-of-current-copyright-regime/.
  23. Nwauche, E.S. (2003). Intellectual property rights, copyright and development policy in a developing country. Paper presented at the Copyright Workshop at Zimbabwe International Book Fair, July 30. http://www.nigerianlawguru.com/articles/intellectual%20property%20law/INTELLECTUAL%20PROPERTY%20RIGHTS,%20COPYRIGHT%20AND%20DEVELOPMENT%20POLICY%20IN%20A%20DEVELOPING%20COUNTRY%20-%20OPTIONS%20FOR%20SUB-SAHARAN%20AFRICAN%20COUNTRIES.pdf
  24. Rønning, H., Thomas, P., Tomaselli, K.G. & Teer-Tomaselli, R.E. (2006). Intellectual property rights and the political economy of culture. Critical Arts, 20(1): 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040608557773
  25. Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC). (2017). The expected impact of the ‘fair use’ provisions and exceptions for education in the Copyright Amendment Bill on the South African publishing industry. https://publishsa.co.za/pwc-report-the-expected-impact-of-the-fair-use-provisions-and-exceptions-for-education-in-the-copyright-amendment-bill-on-the-south-african-publishing-industry/
  26. Publishers’ Association of South Africa (PASA). 2014. The academic textbook industry and higher education in South Africa. Publishers’ Association of South Africa Academic Subcommittee Position Paper. https://publishsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Publishers-Assosciation-Academic-Subcommittee-Position-Paper-2015.pdf
  27. RSA. Republic of South Africa. https://www.parliament.gov.za/storage/app/media/uploaded-files/Copyright%20Amendment%20Bill%20Draft.pdf
  28. Seeber, M. (2021). Copyright Amendment Bill: ANFASA’s Submission. ANFASA Magazine, 5(4): 13-16.
  29. Springer. https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/funding
  30. Tomaselli, K.G. (2018). Perverse incentives and the political economy of South African academic journal publishing. South African Journal of Science, 114(11/12), Art. #4341, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/4341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/4341
  31. Tomaselli, K.G. (2019a). Political economy of the Copyright and Performers Protection Bills. Implications for universities. The Thinker, 81/2019: 29-35.
  32. Tomaselli K.G. (2019b). South Africa’s Copyright Amendment Bill: Implications for Universities. South African Journal of Science, 115(5/6). http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6283
  33. Tomaselli, K.G. (2021). Contemporary Campus Life. Transformation, manic managerialism and academentia. Cape Town: BestRed.
How to Cite
The 2022 Copyright Amendment Bill: Implications for the South African universities’ research economy . (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 41(2), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i2.1479

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate