The 2022 Copyright Amendment Bill: Implications for the South African universities’ research economy

Keyan Tomaselli
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:26:"University of Johannesburg";}


The South African Copyright Amendment Bill of 2017 was passed in 2022. In justifying the weakening of copyright protections with regard to the educational arena, the Bill’s proponents have largely applied rhetorical discourses published in the popular media, also aggressively propagated at their public meetings. In contrast, the publishing industry has generated many hundreds of pages of economic impact studies supported by detailed legal arguments with reference to global treaties. My analysis assesses the different positions taken by the pro-Bill lobby, ReCreate, in comparison to the Copyright Coalition that questions the importation of an American fair use doctrine. The potential implications of the Bill for South African authors and artists operating in the educational environment are described. Since the object of study has been a moving target, and still was at the time of submission of this article, the conclusions that arise out of the ongoing debates are tentative – but prescient for the current conjuncture. The analysis relies on cross-referencing stakeholder submissions, newspaper articles and statements made by all parties to the discussion. In addition, a number of rejoinders were invited, which are published below. The study reveals the stark contradictions within emerging state policy relating to the creative industries in an era when information has economic value. 


  1. ANFASA (Academic and Non-fiction Authors Association pf South Africa) (2019a). A last word on the Copyright Amendment Bill.
  2. ANFASA. (2019b). Cui Bono? Who Benefits? The impact of the Copyright Amendment Bill on scholarly writing and knowledge production in South Africa.
  3. ASSAf (Academy of Science of South Africa) (2022). Copyright Amendment Bill Workshop Proceedings Report. [Online] Available at DOI:
  4. Dean, O.H. (2021). The Gift of Multiplication. Cape Town: Juta.
  5. Degen, J. (2021). The Copyright Amendment Bill: A Canadian experience. ANFASA Magazine, 5(4): 11-12.
  6. Department of Sport, Arts and Culture. (2022, May). Creating and Designing for Growth South Africa’s Creative Industry Masterplan to 2040. A Report of the South African Creative Industry Masterplan Project. Mimeo.
  7. Flynn. S. (2019).
  8. Flynn, S. & Palmedo, M. (2017). The User Rights Database: Measuring the Impact of Copyright Balance, Draft Paper, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property (available at: DOI:
  9. Ford, G.S. (2017). The Vanishing Benefits of Fair Use: A Review of the Flynn- Palmedo Study on “User Rights” in Copyright Law, Perspectives,
  10. Forere, M., Beiter, K.G., Fiil-Flynn, S.M., Klaaren, J., Ncube, C., Nwauche, E., Rens, A., Samtani, S. & Schonwetter, T. Joint academic opinion on South Africa’s copyright Amendment Bill (B-13B OF 2017) Posted by InfoJustice Eds. (May 10, 2021) Academic Resources, Domestic Legislation, Limitations and Exceptions.
  11. Hugenholtz, P.B. & Okediji, R. (March 7, 2012). Conceiving an international instrument on limitations and exceptions to copyright. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, 37: doi:10.2139/ssrn.2017629. S2CID 152366700 DOI:
  12. Karaganis, J. (2018). (Ed.) Shadow Libraries: Access to knowledge in global higher education. IDRC: MIT Press. DOI:
  13. Karjiker, S. (2021). Should South Africa adopt Fair Use? Cutting through the rhetoric. Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg (TSAR), 2021-2: 240-255. DOI:
  14. Klaaren, J. (2015). The South African ‘Secrecy Act’: Democracy put to the test. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 48(3): 284-303. doi: 10.5771/0506-7286-2015-3-284 DOI:
  15. Le Pan (2016). Copyright in Canada: The damage caused by unfair interpretations of “Fair Use”.
  16. Merrett, C. (2006). The expropriation of intellectual capital and the political Economy of international academic publishing. Critical Arts, 20(1): 96-111. DOI:
  17. Moll, I. (2021). The Myth of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Theoria, DOI:
  18. Muller, S.M. (2017) Academics as rent seekers: Distorted incentives in higher education, with reference to the South African case. International Journal of Educational Development, 52: 58-67. DOI:
  19. Myburgh, A. (27 March, 2019). Rights for Creators or Dismantling Copyright?
  20. Myburgh, A. Advice on the Copyright Amendment Bill, No 13 of 2017, revised as of 3 September 2018 for the Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry.
  21. Myburgh, A. & Hollis, S. (2020). Controversial legislation derailed. South Africa’s Copyright Reform, August 2020, 2(7): 3-6.
  22. Nicolson, D.R. (September 15, 2022). New copyright bill will take South Africa into the 21st century at last.
  23. Nwauche, E.S. (2003). Intellectual property rights, copyright and development policy in a developing country. Paper presented at the Copyright Workshop at Zimbabwe International Book Fair, July 30.,%20COPYRIGHT%20AND%20DEVELOPMENT%20POLICY%20IN%20A%20DEVELOPING%20COUNTRY%20-%20OPTIONS%20FOR%20SUB-SAHARAN%20AFRICAN%20COUNTRIES.pdf
  24. Rønning, H., Thomas, P., Tomaselli, K.G. & Teer-Tomaselli, R.E. (2006). Intellectual property rights and the political economy of culture. Critical Arts, 20(1): 1-20. DOI:
  25. Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC). (2017). The expected impact of the ‘fair use’ provisions and exceptions for education in the Copyright Amendment Bill on the South African publishing industry.
  26. Publishers’ Association of South Africa (PASA). 2014. The academic textbook industry and higher education in South Africa. Publishers’ Association of South Africa Academic Subcommittee Position Paper.
  27. RSA. Republic of South Africa.
  28. Seeber, M. (2021). Copyright Amendment Bill: ANFASA’s Submission. ANFASA Magazine, 5(4): 13-16.
  29. Springer.
  30. Tomaselli, K.G. (2018). Perverse incentives and the political economy of South African academic journal publishing. South African Journal of Science, 114(11/12), Art. #4341, 6 pages. DOI:
  31. Tomaselli, K.G. (2019a). Political economy of the Copyright and Performers Protection Bills. Implications for universities. The Thinker, 81/2019: 29-35.
  32. Tomaselli K.G. (2019b). South Africa’s Copyright Amendment Bill: Implications for Universities. South African Journal of Science, 115(5/6). DOI:
  33. Tomaselli, K.G. (2021). Contemporary Campus Life. Transformation, manic managerialism and academentia. Cape Town: BestRed.
How to Cite
Tomaselli, K. (2022). The 2022 Copyright Amendment Bill: Implications for the South African universities’ research economy . Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 41(2), 14–33.

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate