Rethinking the researcher-researched relationship: Research participants as prodsumers

Research participants as prodsumers

Lauren Eva Dyll
University of KwaZulu-Natal
Keyan G Tomaselli
University of Johannesburg
Share:

How to Cite

Rethinking the researcher-researched relationship: Research participants as prodsumers. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 35(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v35i1.1599
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 14, 2022
  • Published: October 17, 2022

Abstract

This article critically examines the conventional researcher-researched relationship that
empowers the researcher over the researched. The orthodoxy of objectivity – claimed to locate
the researchers as neutral observer – is here argued to be a power relation that has an excluding
effect where subject communities are concerned. By means of an archaeological case study that
included mapping and interpretation of ancient rock engravings we offer a new way of negotiating
interpretations. This new way involved four members from a Bushman community who helped us
navigate spiritual, ontological and environmental dimensions in making sense of rock art.

References

  1. Adhikanri, M. (2009). Burdened by race: Coloured identities in Southern Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
  2. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_628130
  3. Allen-Collinson, J. (2013). Autoethnography as the engagement of Self/Other, Self-Culture, Self-Politics, and Selves/Futures. In S. Holman Jones, T.E. Adams & C. Ellis (Eds.), The Handbook of Autoethnography (pp. 281-300). California: Left Coast Books.
  4. Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4):373-395.
  5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449
  6. Ashley, C. & Haysom, G. (2006). From Philanthropy to a different way of doing business: strategies and challenges in integrating pro-poor approaches into tourism business. Development Southern Africa, 23(2):265-280.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350600707553
  8. Barnard, A. (1992). Hunters and herders of Southern Africa: Comparative ethnography of the Khoisan Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166508
  10. Bester, R. & Buntman, B. (1999). Bushman(ia) and photographic intervention. African Arts, 32(4):50-59.
  11. https://doi.org/10.2307/3337668
  12. Bregin, E. & Kruiper, B. (2004). Kalahari Rainsong. Pietermaritzburg: Natal University Press.
  13. Buntman, B. (1996a). Bushman images in South African tourist advertising: The case of Kagga Kamma. In P. Skotnes (Ed.), Miscast: Negotiating the presence of the Bushmen (pp. 271-279). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
  14. Buntman, B. (1996b). Selling with the San: Representations of Bushmen people and artifacts in South African print advertisements. Visual Anthropology, 8(1):33-54.
  15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.1996.9966665
  16. Burger, M. (2015). Public self-expression, identity and the participatory turn: The power to reimagine the self. Communicatio, 41(3):264-286, doi: 10.1080/02500167.2015.1093318
  17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2015.1093318
  18. Butler-Adam J. (2015). The writing on the landscape. South African Journal of Science, 111(3/4):1.
  19. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/a0100
  20. Cann, C. & DeMeulenaere, E. (2012).Critical co-constructed autoethnography, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 12(2):146-158, doi:10.1177/1532708611435214
  21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708611435214
  22. Chang, H. (2013). Individual and Collaborative Autoethnography as Method: A Social Scientist's Perspective. In S. Holman Jones, T.E. Adams & C. Ellis (Eds.), The Handbook of Autoethnography (pp. 107-122). California: Left Coast Books.
  23. Chang, H. Ngunjiri, F.W. & Hernandez, K-A. (2012). Collaborative autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  24. Crisp, B.R. & Beddoe, L. (2013). Promoting health and well-being in social work education. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  25. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315868493
  26. Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. & Smith, L.T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. London: Sage.
  27. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686
  28. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2008). Introduction: Critical methodologies and indigenous inquiry. In Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 1-20). London: Sage.
  29. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686.n1
  30. Dervin, B. (2003). 'Sense-making' journey from metatheory to methodology to method: An example using information seeking and use as research focus. In B. Dervin, C. Foremen-Wernet & E. Lauterbach (Eds.), Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 133-164). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  31. Denzin, N.K. (2006). Analytic autoethnography, or Déjà Vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4):419-428.
  32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286985
  33. Dutta, M.J. (2011). Communicating social change: Structure, culture and agency. Routledge, New York.
  34. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203834343
  35. Dyll, L. (2007). In the sun with Silikat. Writing in the Sand: Autoethnography among indigenous Southern Africans (pp. 117-130). Walnut Creek, California: Altamira Press.
  36. Dyll-Myklebust, L. (2013). Blurring the lines: Rethinking indigeneity research at Biesje Poort. In M.E. Lange, L. Müller Jansen, R.C. Fisher, K.G. Tomaselli & D. Morris (Eds.), Engraved landscape. Biesje Poort: Many voices (pp. 81-87). Pretoria: Tormentoso.
  37. Dyll-Myklebust, L. (2014). Development narratives: the value of multiple voices and ontologies in Kalahari research. Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies, 28(3):521-553.
  38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2014.929214
  39. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
  40. Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Enquiry, 13(1):3-29.
  41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947
  42. Ellis, W. (2014). Simulacral, genealogical, auratic and representational failure: Bushman authenticity as methodological collapse. Critical Arts, 28(3):493-520.
  43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2014.929213
  44. Ellis, C. & Bochner, A.P. (Eds.). (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp.733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  45. Fabian. J. (2006) The other revisited: Critical afterthought. Anthropological Theory 6(2):139-152.
  46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499606065030
  47. Faure, W.C. (Director). (1986). Shaka Zulu. [TV Series]. SABC: Harmony Gold.
  48. Francis, M. & Francis, S. (2010). Representation and misrepresentation: San regional advocacy and the global imagery? Critical Arts, 24(2):210-227.
  49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560041003786490
  50. Gottlieb, A. (1995). Beyond the lonely anthropologist: Collaboration in research and writing. American Anthropologist, 97(1):21-26.
  51. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1995.97.1.02a00050
  52. Grant, J. (2011). Rural development in practice? The experience of the #Khomani Bushmen in the Northern Cape, South Africa. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Centre of African Studies, University of Edinburgh.
  53. Grant, J. & Dicks, A. (2014). Perceived benefits of grassroots comics within three Bushmen communities. Communitas, 19(1):116-135.
  54. Gordon, R.J. (1992). The Bushman myth: The making of the Namibian underclass. Boulder: Westview Press.
  55. Gumucio-Dagron, A. (2014). Indigenous communication: From multiculturalism to interculturality. In K.G. Wilkins, T. Tufte & R. Obregon (Eds.), The handbook of Development Communication and Social Change (pp. 108-124). London: Wiley & Sons.
  56. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118505328.ch7
  57. Hanisch, C. (1970). The personal is political. In S. Firestone & A. Koedt (Eds.), Notes from the second year: Women's liberation (pp. 152-157). New York: New York Radical Feminists.
  58. Hodder, I. (1999). The archaeological process: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  59. Holman Jones, S. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 736-791). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  60. Jenkins, E. (2004). Sharing our stories. Cape Libre Sept/Oct 2004, pp. 12-15. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.westerncape.gov.za/text/2005/2/sep04_ article2pg12_15.pdf
  61. Kincheloe, J. & Steinberg, S. (2008). Indigenous knowledges in education: Complexities, dangers and profound benefits. In N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln & L.T. Smith (Eds.). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 134-150). London: Sage.
  62. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686.n7
  63. Kruiper, V.R.B. (2014). Mooi Loop. The Sacred Art of Vetkat Regopstaan Kruiper. Pretoria: UNISA Press.
  64. Lange, M.E. (2006). Tracking decorated ostrich eggshells in the Kalahari. Visual Anthropology, 19(1):371-388.
  65. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949460600598745
  66. Lange, M.E. (Ed.). (2014). Water stories: Original! Garib narrations about the water snake. Pretoria: UNISA Press.
  67. Lange, M.E. & Dyll-Myklebust, L. (2015). Spirituality, shifting identities and social change: Cases from the Kalahari landscape. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 71(1):1-11. Art, doi:org/10.4102/hts.v71i1.2985
  68. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i1.2985
  69. Lange M.E., Müller Jansen, L., Fisher, R.C., Tomaselli, K.G. & Morris, D. (Eds.). (2013). Engraved Landscape. Biesje Poort: Many voices. Pretoria: Tormentoso.
  70. Leuthold, S. (1998). Indigenous aesthetics: Native art, media and society, Austin: University of Texas.
  71. https://doi.org/10.7560/747029
  72. Magongo, M. (2013). Participatory communication: A tool for social and heritage development. In M.E. Lange, L. Müller Jansen, R. Fisher, K.G. Tomaselli & D. Morris (Eds.), Engraved landscape. Biesje Poort: Many voices (pp. 93-100). Gordon's Bay: Tormentoso.
  73. Marstine, J., Bauer, A.A. & Haines, C. (2011). New directions in museum ethics. Museum management and curatorship, 26(2):91-95.
  74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2011.566709
  75. Masoga, M.H. & Kaya, H. (2011). Building on the indigenous: An appropriate paradigm for sustainable development in Africa. In G. Walmsley (Ed.), African philosophy and the future of Africa cultural heritage and contemporary change, 14:153−169.
  76. Mboti, N. (2012). Research, Method and Position: What are we doing? In K.G. Tomaselli, (Ed.), Cultural Tourism and Identity: Rethinking Indigeneity (pp. 53-70). Leiden: Brill.
  77. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004234581_005
  78. Melber, H. & Schoeman, M. (2011). The United Nations and Regional Challenges in Africa - 50 Years after Dag Hammarskjöld. Development Dialogue No. 57. The Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.
  79. Mhiripiri, N.A. (2012). A performative encounter with artist Silikat van Wyk in the Kalahari. Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies, 26(3):375-400.
  80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2012.705462
  81. Morris, D. (2014). Narrating Biesje Poort: Negotiating absence of storyline, vagueness and multivocality in the representation of Southern Kalahari rock engravings. Critical Arts: South- North Cultural and Media Studies, 28(4):648-669.
  82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2014.929222
  83. Muller, L. (2013). Reading the Biesje Poort landscape. In M.E. Lange, L. Müller-Jansen, R. Fisher, K.G. Tomaselli & D. Morris (Eds.), Engraved landscape. Biesje Poort Many Voices (pp. 21-41). Pretoria: Tormentoso.
  84. Parker W.M. & Becker-Benton, A. (2016). Experiences in conducting participatory communication research for HIV prevention globally: Translating critical dialog into action through action media. Front. Public Health, 4:128. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00128
  85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00128
  86. Quarry, W. & Ramirez, R. (2009). Communication for another development. Listening before telling. London: Zed Books.
  87. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350219274
  88. Ramutsindela, M. (2003). Land reform in South Africa's national parks: A catalyst for the humannature nexus. Land Use Policy 20 (pp. 41-49). Retrieved September 6th, 2010, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0264-8377(02)00054-6
  89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00054-6
  90. Ruby, J. (1977). The Image Mirrored: Reflexivity and the Documentary Film. Journal of the University Film Association, 29(1):3-18.
  91. Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
  92. Stoller, P. (1989). The taste of ethnographic things. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  93. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812203141
  94. Swadener, B.B. & Mutua, K. (2008). Decolonizing performances: Deconstructing the global postcolonial. In N.K. Denzin, Y. Lincoln & L.T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical indigenous methodologies (pp. 31-43). London: Sage.
  95. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686.n2
  96. Tacchi, J. & Lennie, J. (2014). A Participatory Framework for researching and evaluating communication for development and social change. In K.G. Wilkins, T. Tufte & R. Obregon (Eds.), The Handbook of Development Communication and Social Change (pp. 298-320). London: Wiley & Sons.
  97. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118505328.ch18
  98. Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.
  99. Toffler, A. (1981). The third wave. New York: Bantam Books.
  100. Tomaselli, K. (Ed.). (1992). Cultural tourism and identity: Rethinking indigeniety. Leiden: Brill.
  101. Tomaselli, K.G. (2001). The semiotics of anthropological authenticity: The film apparatus and cultural accommodation. Visual Anthropology, 14(2):173-183.
  102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2001.9966824
  103. Tomaselli, K.G. (2006). Rereading the Gods Must be Crazy films. Visual Anthropology, 19(2):171-200.
  104. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949460600598711
  105. Tomaselli, K.G. (Ed.). (2007). Writing in the San/d. Autoethnography among indigenous Southern Africans. United Kingdom: Altamira Press.
  106. Tomaselli, K.G. (Ed.) (2012). Cultural tourism and identity: rethinking indigeneity. Leiden: Brill.
  107. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004234581
  108. Tomaselli, K.G. & Dyll-Myklebust, L. (2015). Public self-expression: Decolonising researcherresearched relationships. Communicatio: Southern African Journal for Theory and Research, 41(3):72-91.
  109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2015.1093328
  110. Tomaselli, K.G. Dyll-Myklebust, L. & Van Grootheest, S. (2013). Personal/political interventions via autoethnography: Dualisms, knowledge, power and performativity in research relations. In S. Holman Jones, T.E. Adams & C. Ellis (Eds.), The handbook of autoethnography (pp. 576-598). California: Left Coast Books.
  111. Tomaselli, K.G., Rønning, H. & Mboti, N. (2013). South-North perspectives: The development of cultural and media studies in Southern Africa. Media, Culture and Society, 35(1):36-43.
  112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712464556
  113. Turkle, S. (1999). Cyberspace and identity. Contemporary Sociology, 28(6):643-448.
  114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2655534
  115. Usher, R. & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. London: Routledge.
  116. Ver Beek, K. (2000). Spirituality: A development taboo. Development in Practice, 10(1):31-43.
  117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520052484
  118. Von Stauss, A. (2012). Intercultural encounters: The Kalahari and the Zulu. In K.G. Tomaselli (Ed.), Cultural tourism and identity: Rethinking indigeneity (pp. 85-98). Leiden: Brill.
  119. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004234581_007
  120. White, H. (1995). In the tradition of the forefathers: Bushman traditionality at Kagga Kamma. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
How to Cite
Rethinking the researcher-researched relationship: Research participants as prodsumers. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 35(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v35i1.1599

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate