State-media relations in post-apartheid South Africa: An application of comparative media systems theory
An application of comparative media systems theory
Copyright and Licensing:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Share:
How to Cite
State-media relations in post-apartheid South Africa: An application of comparative media systems theory. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 26(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v26i2.1721
- Articles
- Submited: October 18, 2022
-
Published: October 20, 2022
Abstract
In 2004, Daniel Hallin and Paolo Mancini published a landmark work of media theory entitled
Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. The theory, like the models it
makes use of, has a high degree of relevance for South African media scholars. Primarily, the
theory investigates the relationship between the state and the media, an interconnection of profound
significance in the South African context, yet one that has not been explored sufficiently by scholars.
This article, which focuses primarily on South Africa’s print media sector, sets out the parameters,
major dimensions and some indicators of the Three Models paradigm. It then presents recent
research in which the theory is applied to South Africa. It concludes that South Africa’s media
system falls largely into the Polarised Pluralist model though it retains strong liberal model traits
Article Metrics Graph
References
- Bagdikian, B.H. (2000). The Media Monopoly. 6th edition. Boston: Beacon Books.
- Barratt, E. (2006). Part of the story: 10 years of the South African National Editors' Forum. Johannesburg: Sanef.
- Berger, G. (1999). Towards an analysis of the SA media and transformation, 1994-99. Transformation 38, 82-116.
- -. (2000). Deracialisation, democracy and development. Paper prepared for The Political Economy of the Media in Southern Africa seminar, April 24-29, Durban. Retrieved November 12, 2003, from www.ru.ac.za.
- -. (2002). Theorising the media-democracy relationship in Southern Africa, The International Journal for Communication Studies 64(1), 21-45.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640010201
- Berkel, B. (2006). Political Parallelism in news and commentaries on the Haider conflict. Acomparative analysis of Austrian, British, German and French quality newspapers. Communications 31, 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.006
- Blumler, J.G. & Gurevitch, M. (1995). Towards a comparative framework for political communication research. In Blumler and Gurevitch (Eds), The crisis of public communication (1975), 59-72. London: Routledge.
- Boloka, M. (2004). Diversity goes global in Rhodes Journalism Review 24: 10 years of Democracyand Media Freedom in South Africa, September. Grahamstown: Rhodes University.
- Botma, G.J. (2006). The structure of content: the political economy of Die Burger Western Cape, 2004-5. Paper presented at the 2006 annual South African Communications Association Conference, Creating the Media Future, Stellenbosch.
- Boyle, B. (2007, 2 February). ANC wants media to be controlled. Sunday Times, p.15.
- Butler, A. (2007). The state of the African National Congress. In Buhlungu, S., Daniel, J., Southall, R. & Lutchman, J. (Eds) State of the Nation: South Africa 2007. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
- Couldry, N. (2005). Book review in Political Studies Review 3(2), 308.
- De Beer, A.S. & Steyn, E. (2002). South African National Skills Audit. Unpublished report, prepared for the South African National Editors' Forum (Sanef), and the Sanef Education and Training Committee (ETC). http://scribe.co.za; or http://www.mediatenor.co.za https://doi.org/10.1080/02560054.2002.10798725
- Graber, D. (2006). Book review in Political Psychology 27(6), 935-936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00547_1.x
- Grové, A. (1996). Changes and imminent ownership changes in South Africa's printed media industry since 1994, Ecquid Novi 17(2), 327-333.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02560054.1996.9653189
- Gumede, W.M. (2005). Thabo Mbeki and the battle for the soul of the ANC. Cape Town: Zebra Press.
- Hallin, D.C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
- Hampton, M. (2005). Media studies and the mainstreaming of media history, Media History 11(3), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688800500353805
- Harber, A. (2002). Journalism in the age of the market. Harold Wolpe Memorial Lecture delivered at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg.
- Hardt, H. (2004). Myths for the masses: an essay on mass communication. London: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774335
- Jacobs, S.H. (2004). Public sphere, power and democratic politics: media and policy debates in post-apartheid South Africa. Unpublished PhD thesis, Birkbeck College, University of London. Johnson, S. (1991). An Historical Overview of the Black Press. In Tomaselli, K. & Louw, P.E. (Eds).
- The Alternative Press in South Africa (pp.15-32). Johannesburg: Anthropos.
- Johnston, A. (2005). The African National Congress, the print media and the development of mediated politics in South Africa, CriticalArts 19(1&2), 12-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040585310031
- Krabill, R. (2001). Symbiosis: mass media and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa, Media, Culture & Society 23(5), 567-585.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016344301023005002
- Laden, S. (2001). Magazine matters: toward a Cultural Economy of the South African (print) media. In Tomaselli, K. & Dunn, H. Media, democracy and renewal in Southern Africa, (pp.181- 208). Colorado: International Academic Publishers.
- Luthuli, P.S.W. (2004). Against a heavy groundswell of criticism: the media monitoring project and text-orientated discourse analysis, Communicatio 30(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500160408537986
- Mabote, R. (1996). Changes in print media ownership in South Africa, Ecquid Novi 12(2), 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560054.1996.9653188
- McChesney, R.W. (1992). Off limits: an inquiry into the lack of debate over the ownership, structure and control of the mass media in US political life, Communication 13, 1-19.
- -. (2004). The problem of the media: US communications politics in the 21st century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
- Media Tenor. (2004). Media's perception of political parties in South Africa in the run-up to the national elections in April 2004. Presentation of data by Wadim Schreiner, Media Tenor,Pretoria. http://www.mediatenor.co.za
- McQuail, D. (2006). Book review in European Journal of Communication 20(2), 266-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/026732310502000209
- Nerone, J.C. (1995). Revisiting four theories of the press. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Schillinger, E. (1989). A dynamic theory of world press motivation: an integrative model. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC),Washington DC. Siebert, F., Peterson,T. & Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Starr, P. (2004). The Creation of the Media. Political origins of modern communications. New York: Basic Books.
- Steenveld, L. (2004). Transforming the media: A cultural approach, Critical Arts 18(1), 92-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560240485310061
- Tomaselli, K., Tomaselli, R. & Muller, J. (1987). The Press in South Africa. Johannesburg: Richard Lyon & Co. Tomaselli, K. (1997). Ownership and control in the South African print media: black economic empowerment after apartheid, 1990-97, Ecquid Novi 18(1), 21-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560054.1997.9653194
How to Cite
State-media relations in post-apartheid South Africa: An application of comparative media systems theory. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 26(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v26i2.1721
