Reconciling editorial independence and public accountability issues in Public Broadcasting Service: : editorial policies at the South African Broadcasting Corporation1

: editorial policies at the South African Broadcasting Corporation1

Guy Berger
Rhodes University
Denis Jjuuko
Rhodes University
Share:

How to Cite

Reconciling editorial independence and public accountability issues in Public Broadcasting Service: : editorial policies at the South African Broadcasting Corporation1. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 26(1), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v26i1.1716
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 17, 2022
  • Published: October 20, 2022

Abstract

A public broadcaster is pulled in two directions: There is the need to be accountable to the public,
and the imperative to be editorially independent at the same time. The first implies parameters
and control systems; the second points to the need for autonomy. This distinctive tension marks
out a key difference between public and private broadcasting (through the public accountability
component), and between public and government-controlled broadcasting (through the editorial
independence proviso). Several dimensions can be identified in regard to assessing accountability
and editorial independence, and also to the way that policy can work to integrate these two
apparently contradictory imperatives. In 2004, the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC)
was required in effect to mediate the complex challenges in this tension by formulating detailed
editorial policies and systems. The significance of the SABC experience also extends to understanding
the nature of policy more broadly

References

  1. African Charter on Broadcasting. (2001). Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.misa.org/broadcasting/resource-acb/brochure.pdf
  2. ANC. (2002). Resolutions Adopted by the 51st National Conference of the African National
  3. Congress, Stellenbosch, 2002. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/conf/conference51/resolutions.html
  4. -. (2003, 12 June) Submission of the African National Congress on the draft editorial policies of the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC). Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/misc/2003/sabcpolicy.html
  5. Barker, J. M. (2000). Media Institute of Southern Africa: campaign for the liberalisation of broadcasting. Windhoek: Namibia.
  6. Berger, G. (1997). Accountability of the Media to Society - Reality or Myth? Retrieved November 1, 2004 from http://journ.ru.ac.za/staff/guy/Research/Democracy/accountable.htm
  7. -. (1999, 21 May). 'FM did us all a favour.' The Sowetan.
  8. -. (2003a). Submission on SABC's Draft Editorial Policies by Rhodes University Department of
  9. Journalism and Media Studies. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://journ.ru.ac.za/staff/ guy/fulltext/sabcpolicies.doc
  10. -. (2003b, 4 April). 'Don't mess with editors' independence.' The Sunday Times.
  11. -. (2004a, 13 October). What Andrew Gilligham regrets. Converse. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from
  12. http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=139450&area=/ insight/insight__columnists/
  13. -. (2004b, 9-12 February 2005). Why policies matter for engendering plural, profitable & sustainable media in Africa. A primer for media leaders. Presentation and paper. Media Management
  14. Seminar Series organised by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Policies & Strategies for Media Viability in Africa. Maputo. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://journ.ru.ac.za/staff/guy/fulltext/kafmediapolicy.rtf
  15. Bloom, K. (2002). Balancing interests at the SABC. The Media. November. Retrieved May 2, 2007,
  16. from http://www.themedia.co.za/article.aspx?articleid=30924&area=/media_ insightcover_stories
  17. -. (2004). A Kind of Hush. The Media, April. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.themedia.co.za/article.aspxarticleid=77740&area=/media_insightcover_stories/
  18. Barratt, E. (2006). Part of the story. Ten years of the South African National Editors' Forum.
  19. Retrieved May 2, 2007, from www.sanef.org.za/download_files/sanef_calendar/10birthday_oct06/full.pdfs
  20. Bussiek, C & Bussiek, H. (n.d.) Notes on the Apartheid SABC. Unpublished report commissioned for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
  21. CBA. (2004). CBA Editorial Guidelines. Mary Raine. (Ed.) New Delhi: Unesco Asia-Pacific Regional Bureau for Communication and Information.
  22. Certimedia. (2003) International Standard Quality Management Systems. Requirements for Radio,
  23. Television, Broadcasters and Internet Content Producers. Retrieved November 29, 2004, from
  24. http://www.certimedia.org/download/ISAS%20BC%209001%20Standard%20English.pdf
  25. Cosatu. (2002a, 18 September). Cosatu Submission on the Broadcasting Amendment Bill to the
  26. Portfolio Committee on Communications. 18 September 2002. Retrieved February 10, 2005, from
  27. http://www.cosatu.org.za/ docs/2002/broadsub.htm#removal
  28. -. (2002b, 16 October). Clarification on Submission on the Broadcasting Amendment Bill.
  29. Submitted to the Communications Portfolio Committee. Retrieved May 2, 2006, fromwww.cosatu.org.za/submiss2002.htm
  30. -. (2002c, 1 November). Memo on the Broadcasting Amendment Bill. Submitted to the SC on
  31. Labour & Public Enterprise. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.cosatu.org.za/docs/2002/1stnov.htm
  32. Duncan, J. (2002, 19 October). Neither Washington nor Moscow: national and public interest in relation to the South African Broadcasting Corporation. National Press Freedom Day. Department of Journalism and Media Studies, University of the Witwatersrand. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from fxi.org.za/public_broadcasting.htm
  33. -. (2003). Another journalism is possible: critical challenges for the media in South Africa. Harold Wolpe Lecture Series. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://www.nu.ac.za/ccs/default.asp?11,22,5,341
  34. Fourie, P. (n.d.). Leapfrogging into the market approach: the loss of public service broadcasting for development and nation building. Retrieved March 20, 2006, from http://www.pucrs.br/famecos/iamcr/textos/fourie.pdf
  35. FXI. (2002, 17 September). Comments on Broadcasting Amendment Bill. Freedom of Expression
  36. Institute, Public hearings: Portfolio Committee on Communications. Retrieved May 2, 2006,rom http://66.249.93.104/search?q=cache:jZXWtZTAZYwJ:fxi.org.za/archives/
  37. amendment_bill_comments.html+site:fxi.org.za+sabc+editorial+policies&hl=en&gl=za&ct=clnk&cd=8&client=firefox-a Also retrieved February 10, 2005, from http://www.save-publicbroadcasting.org/countries/safrica4.htm
  38. -. (2004, 9 June). Freedom of Expression Institute Submission on the South African Broadcasting Corporation's Application for Licence Amendments, Submitted to the Independent
  39. Communications Authority of South Africa. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from fxi.org.za/pdf/ Submission%20to%20Icasa%20on%20the%20SABC's%20license%20application.pdfHabermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into category of the bourgeois society. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  40. Harber, A. (2005/2006, 25 April). Latest Icasa bill is an ignoble twist in an old story. Business Day.
  41. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/opinion.aspx? ID=BD4A163355
  42. Hassen, F. (2004, August). Presentation on final editorial policies. (Delivered to students, Rhodes
  43. University). Retrieved November 20, 2004, from http://journ.ru.ac.za/staff/guy/Teaching/Policy/policy04/policies_rhodes_august 2004.ppt
  44. Hills, J. (2003). 'Regulatory Models for Broadcasting in Africa.' In Kupe, T. (Ed.). Broadcasting Policy and Practice in Africa. London: Article 19.
  45. Holomisa, B. (2002). 'Broadcasting Bill a Recipe for Disaster.' The Sowetan. Retrieved February 21, 2005, from http://www.udm.org.za/statements_dir2002/assocs/broadcasting_ammendment_bill_recipe_for_disaster.htm
  46. Hornby, A.S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Horwitz, R.B. (2001). Communication and democratic reform in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  48. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510151
  49. Icasa. (2002, 18 September). Submission on Broadcasting Amendment Bill Final. Retrieved February 10, 2005, from http://www.icasa.org.za/Default.aspx?page=1537&moduledata=972
  50. IFJ. (2002). Public Broadcasting in South Africa: FXI comments on SABC's draft editorial policy.
  51. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.ifj.org/default.asp?index=1688&Language=EN
  52. Jjuuko, D.C. (2006). Understanding editorial independence and public accountability issues in public broadcasting service: a study of the editorial policies at the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC). Masters' thesis, Rhodes University. http://eprints.ru.ac.za/261/
  53. Kantor, L. (2003, 10 October). Presentation on SABC Draft Editorial Policies. (Delivered to students at Rhodes University). Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://journ.ru.ac.za/staff/guy/Teaching/Policy/sabcpolicies.ppt
  54. Krabill, R. (2001). Symbiosis: mass media and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Media Culture & Society, 23:567-585.
  55. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344301023005002
  56. Kupe, T. (2003a). (Ed.). Broadcasting policy and practice in Africa. London: Article 19.
  57. -. (2003b, 4 May). Can SABC live up to its own billing? Sunday Times
  58. Matsepe-Casaburri, I. (2002, 16 September). Hearing on Broadcasting Amendment Bill. Speech
  59. by the Minister of Communications, Dr Ivy Matsepe-Casaburri, on the occasion of public hearings on the Broadcasting Amendment Bill, Cape Town. Source: Ministry of Communications.
  60. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from www.polity.org.za/html/govdocs/ speeches/2002/sp0916a.html
  61. McChesney, R.W. (2000). Rich media, poor democracy; communication politics in dubious times.
  62. New York: The New Press.
  63. McQuail, D. (2000). Mass Communication Theory. (4th ed.). London: Sage.
  64. Mendel, T. (1998). Public Service Broadcasting; Enabling Broadcasters to Play their Role Effectively. Southern Africa Media Law Briefing. Vol 3 No 4 (Nov).
  65. Minnie, J. (2000). The growth of independent broadcasting in South Africa. Lessons for Africa.
  66. In R. Fardon & G. Furniss (2000). African Broadcast Cultures. Radio in Transition. London: James Currey.
  67. Misa. (2003). MISA-SA comments on the SABC's draft editorial policy [07 Jul 2003 09:46]. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.biz-community.com/Article/196/15/2114.html; see also http://www.za.misa.org/pdf_Reports/MISA-SAsubmissionSABCsEditorialPolicy.pdf
  68. -. (2004). Submission of the Media Institute of Southern Africa, South Africa Chapter, on the application for amendment of SABC licences in terms of Section 22 of the Broadcasting Act Number 4 of 1999. 9 June 2004 (Unpublished).
  69. MMP. (2003). Submission to the SABC. Draft Editorial Policies. 13 June 2003. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://mediamonitoring.org.za/cms/files/MMP_SABC_Editorial_Submission_Final.doc
  70. -. (2004). Media Monitoring Project - SABC Licence Amendment Submission. 9th June 2004.
  71. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://mediamonitoring.org.za/cms/files/MMP_ICASA_SABC_Submission_Finalv2.doc
  72. Mpofu, A. (1996). The Role of the Public Broadcaster in a Future South Africa. Broadcasting
  73. Policy Research: Framework Report. In A. Mpofu, S. Manhando & K. Tomaselli (Eds). Public service broadcasting in South Africa: policy directions towards 2000. Johannesburg: Anthropos.
  74. Opoku-Mensah, A. (1998). Broadcasting in Southern Africa: an overview. In A. Opoku-Mensah,
  75. (Ed.), Up in the Air? The State of Broadcasting in Southern Africa. Lusaka: Panos Southern Africa.
  76. Ramatlhodi, N. (2003, 15 July). Welcome address by Adv. Ngoako Ramatlhodi, Premier of Limpopo during the SABC editorial policy public hearings at Cosmo Leisure (Polokwane). Retrieved May 2, 2006, from www.info.gov.za/speeches/2003/03080816461002.htm
  77. RSA. (1999). Broadcasting Act. No 4 of 1999. [Assented To 23 April, 1999]. Retrieved February10, 2005, from http://www.info.gov.za/gazette/acts/1999/a4-99.pdf
  78. -. (2002a). Broadcasting Amendment Bill, 2002. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from
  79. http://www.info.gov.za/gazette/bills/2002/23745.pdf
  80. -. (2002b). Broadcasting Amendment Bill. B-34d-2002. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from
  81. http://www.info.gov.za/gazette/bills/2002/b34d-02.pdf
  82. -. (2003). Broadcasting Amendment Act, 2002. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.info.gov.za/gazette/acts/2002/a64-02.pdf
  83. SABC. (2003). SABC Draft Editorial Policies. Johannesburg: SABC.
  84. -. (2004). SABC Editorial Policies. Johannesburg: SABC. Retrieved May 2, 2007,
  85. http://vcmstatic.sabc.co.za/VCMStaticProdStage/CORPORATE/SABC%20Corporate/Document/About%20SABC/ Legislative%20&%20Regulatory%20Organs/mandate.pdf
  86. Sapa. (2002, August 13). State wants accountability, not control of SABC: Minister.
  87. Sisulu, Z. & Marcus, G. (2006). South African Broadcasting Corporation. Commission of Enquiry into Blacklisting and Related Matters. Published on www.mg.co.za on 2006/10/14. Retrieved
  88. February 15, 2007, from www.mg.co.za/ ContentImages/286848/SABCBLACKLISTREPORT.pdf
  89. Tleane, C. & Duncan, J. (2003). Public Broadcasting in the era of cost recovery: a critique of the South African Broadcasting Corporation's crisis of accountability. Johannesburg: Freedom of Expression Institute.
  90. Warren, C. (1998). 'Editorial Democracy; a Fight for Our Space.' In J. Duncan & M. Seloane (Eds).
  91. Media and Democracy in South Africa. Pretoria: HSRC Publishers, Johannesburg: FXI.
  92. Wasserman, H. (2006). Globalized values and postcolonial responses. South African perspectives on normative media ethics. Gazette. 68(1):71-91.
  93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048506060116
How to Cite
Reconciling editorial independence and public accountability issues in Public Broadcasting Service: : editorial policies at the South African Broadcasting Corporation1. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 26(1), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v26i1.1716

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate