The (O)mission statements: Deficit and surplus messages in two universities’ strategic development plans in South Africa

Deficit and surplus messages in two universities’ strategic development plans in South Africa

Share:

How to Cite

The (O)mission statements: Deficit and surplus messages in two universities’ strategic development plans in South Africa. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 37(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v37i1.1563
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 11, 2022
  • Published: October 13, 2022

Abstract

This paper interrogates the mission statements and strategic development plans of two universities in South Africa in order to unpack both the deficit and surplus messages embedded in them. One of the universities is located in a rural setting and was classified as formerly disadvantaged, while the other one was a formerly white and privileged university. This article is a qualitative study and
employs a content and discursive analytic approach, together with McLaren’s (1994) typological framework on the four forms of multiculturalism in order to interrogate the mission statements and strategic development plans of the two universities in question. Both the mission statements and the strategic development plans are examined for the ways in which they discursively identify who
is included and excluded from the realisation and attainment of the missions and development plans of the two universities studied. The article argues that specific discourse patterns emerge from the two universities’ mission statements and strategic development plans to the extent that either marginalising messages or promissory and empowering messages are conveyed inadvertently in the inscriptions. The article ultimately suggests that there is a need for a shift from a deficit discourse to looking critically and reflexively at current university practices and shortcomings in the use of discourse patterns to include or exclude significant agents in both the crafting and implementation of the principalities embedded in their mission statements and strategic development plans.

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (1993/1996). The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? Madison: The University of Wisconsin.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630930140101
  3. Ayers, D. F. & Carlone, D. (2007). Manifestations of neoliberal discourses in a local job-training programme. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26:461-479.
  4. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701417277
  5. Bakhtin, M. (1981/1990). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  6. Balfour, R. (2017). The decolonization of teacher education. [Dean's Memo 9]. North-West University.
  7. Burik, S. (2010). The end of comparative philosophy and the task of comparative thinking. New York: State University of New York.
  8. Chaput, C. (2008). Inside the teaching machine: Rhetoric and globalisation of the US public research university. USA: University of Alabama Press.
  9. Cook, V. (2001). Key issues in second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  10. DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1991). The Iron Age revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48:147-160.
  11. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  12. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4:133-168.
  13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
  14. Fairclough, N. (1998). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
  15. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London:
  16. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
  17. Routledge.
  18. Gee, J.P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
  19. Jansen, J. (2013). We need to act. Johannesburg: Macmillan.
  20. Janks, H. 2010. Literacy and Power. London: Routledge.
  21. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869956
  22. Kristeva, J. (1980/1992).Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Translated by Gora, T. New York: Columbia University Press.
  23. Levin, M. & Martin, A.W. (2007). The praxis of educating action researchers - The possibilities in higher education. Action Research, 5(3): 219-229. doi: 10.1177/1476750307081014
  24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750307081014
  25. Makoe, P. & McKinley, C. (2009). Hybrid discursive practices in a South African multilingual primary classroom: A case study. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(2):80-95. Available from: http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2009v8nart4.pdf
  26. McLaren, P. (1994). A pedagogy of possibility: Reflecting upon Paulo Freire's politics of education.
  27. Educational Researcher, 28(2):49-56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1177189
  28. Morphew, C. C. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institution type. Journal of Higher Education, 77:456-472.
  29. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0025
  30. Parkinson, J., Jackson, L., Kirkwood, T. & Padayache, V. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of an academic literacy course: Do students benefit? Per Linguam, 24(1):11-29.
  31. https://doi.org/10.5785/24-1-37
  32. Parmegiani, A. (2009). The power of English and academic literacy: Students' perceptions and theoretical, political and pedagogical implications. A case study of students at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). UKZN, KwaZula-Natal.
  33. Phillips, H. (2010). The History of the University of Cape Town 1928-1948: The Formative Years. Cape Town: UCT Press.
  34. Ritchie, W. (1918). The History of the SA College: 1829-1918 (2 volumes). Cape Town: Maskew Miller.
  35. Slaughter, S. & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  36. Swales, J. & Rogers, P. (1995). Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement. Discourse & Society, 2(6): 223-242. Available from: <http://hdl.handle. net/2027.42/67339>
  37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002005
  38. Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: 'Glocalization' and the politics of scale. In: Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local. Edited by Cox, K.R. New York/ London: Guilford/Longman.
  39. Tierney, K. (2008). Resilience and the neoliberal project: Discourses, critiques, practices - And Katrina.American Behavioural Scientist, 59(10), 1327-1342. doi: 10.1177/0002764215591187
  40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215591187
  41. Van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2):249-283.
  42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
  43. Van Schalkwyk, S. (2008). Acquiring academic literacy: A case of first-year extended degreeprogramme at Stellenbosch University. SunScholar Research Repository. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1418
  44. Wilkins, J. (21 June 2011). Not by skills alone. Times Higher Education, 1-6.
  45. Worldbank. (n.d). The strategic planning process. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRREGTOPTEIA/Resources/mosaica10steps.pdf
How to Cite
The (O)mission statements: Deficit and surplus messages in two universities’ strategic development plans in South Africa. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 37(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v37i1.1563

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate