Advance Search

Reflections on the current state and future of strategic communication as paradigm and practice

Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2023 Nina Overton-De Klerk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Share:

How to Cite

Reflections on the current state and future of strategic communication as paradigm and practice. (2023). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 42(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v42i1.2486
  • Articles
  • Submited: May 22, 2023
  • Published: July 21, 2023

Abstract

This paper reflects upon disciplinary developments since the publication of the seminal article by Overton-de Klerk and Verwey in 2013 on emerging paradigm shifts in strategic communication. It also reflects upon the implications of several disruptive global events for these paradigm shifts since the untimely passing of Verwey in 2019. It is argued that the paradigm shifts, as they are currently framed, can lead to a continuing linearity dilemma and binary trap of either-or thinking. A prognosis for the future of strategic communication in paradigm and practice in five statements is provided. The author suggests that the time has come to move beyond postmodern thinking towards both-and thinking and embrace a more comprehensive approach of critical complexity, acknowledging the reciprocal relationship between the parts and the whole. Within a complexity framework, it is proposed that a reflective regeneration of strategic communication includes a scrutiny of new logics and lenses relevant in an African context, including Radical Reason and metamodernism, coupled with lateral, collaborative transdisciplinary responses to digital and other complexities facing humanity, also in the workplace.

PDF
PDF

Article Metrics Graph

Article Views | PDF Downloads
Chart Graph | Range Graph

References

  1. Adams, R. & Soudien, C. (2022). Introduction: Radical Reason. The state of the social sciences and humanities. South African Journal of Science. 2022(18):1–3. (Special Issue: Radical Reason).
  2. Azionya, C. (2022). The value creation of South African millennial interactions on digital multisided platforms in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Doctoral Thesis. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
  3. Baran, B.E. & Woznyj, H.M. (2021) Managing VUCA: The human dynamics of agility, Organizational Dynamics, 50:1–8.
  4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100787
  5. Barker, R. & Hanekom, J. (2022). Theoretical framework for knowledge sharing and co-creation of messages on digital platforms: A consumer knowledge management perspective. Consumer Behavior Review, 6(1), e-252642. https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2022.252642
  6. Benecke, D.R. & Phumo, T. (2021). A road less travelled: Re-charting future strategic communication in southern Africa. In Strategic Communication. South African Perspectives, pp. 471–480. Edited by S. Verwey, D.R. Benecke & T. Phumo. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
  7. Brink, C. (2018). The soul of a university. Why excellence is not enough. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  8. Brink, C. (2021). Academic responsibility: The changing mission of HE. University World News. Africa Edition. 21 January:1–5.
  9. Cameron, E. (2021). To enforce the Covid lockdown, did we wage a war on the people of South Africa? Available from: https://www.news24.com/news24/columnists/guestcolumn /edwin-cameron-to-enforce-the-covid-lockdown-did-we-wage-a-war-on-the-people-of-south-africa-20210306
  10. Cilliers, P. (2011). Complexity, poststructuralism and organization. In The Sage Handbook of Complexity and Management, pp. 142–154. Edited by P. Allen, S. Maguire & B. McKelvey. London: Sage Publications.
  11. Cilliers, P. & Nicolescu, B. (2012). Complexity and transdisciplinarity – discontinuity, levels of reality and the Hidden Third. Futures. 44 (2012):711–718.
  12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.04.001
  13. De Rosa, A., Mannarini, T., de Montes, L.G., Holman, A., Lauri, M.A., Negura, L., et al. (2021). Sense making processes and social representations of Covid-19 in multi-voiced public discourse: Illustrative examples of institutional and media communication in ten countries. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 7(1):13–53.
  14. De Sousa Santos, B., Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. & Soudien, C. (2022). Critical reflections on the place of the University in the 21st century. South African Journal of Science. 2022 (18): 6–11. (Special Issue: Radical Reason).
  15. Du Preez, M. (2023). Oor basiese waardes durf joernaliste nooit neutraal staan nie. Vrye Weekblad, 13 Maart.
  16. Edelman. (2021). Edelman Trust Barometer 2021. Available from: https://www.edelman.com /trust/2021-trust-barometer
  17. Falkheimer, J. & Heide, M. (2023). Strategic Communication. An Introduction to Theory and Global Practice. 2nd ed. NY: Routledge.
  18. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
  19. Freinacht, H. (2015). Five things that make you metamodern. Available from: https://metamoderna.org/5-things-that-make-you-metamodern?lang=en
  20. Freinacht, H. (2017). Metamodernism, the conquest of a term. Available from: https://metamoderna.org/metamodernism-the-conquest-of-a-term?lang=en
  21. Fuhr, I. (2020). A culture blueprint. cliffcentral.com. Available from: http://cliffcentral.com/marketshare/a-culture-blueprint-ian-fuhr/
  22. Fuhr, I. (2021). Cultureneering. Culture, diversity and customer service. Johannesburg: Pan Macmillan South Africa.
  23. Grunig, J.E. (2001). Two-way symmetrical public relations: past, present and future. In Handbook of Public Relations, pp. 11–31. Edited by R.L. Heath & G. Vasquez.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  24. Grunig, J E., Grunig, L. & Dozier, D.M. (2002). Excellent public relations and effective organisations. A study of communication management in three countries. New Jersey:
  25. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  26. Grunwald, A. (2004). Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: The need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004619
  27. Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society 39(4):145–171. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341
  28. Heidema, J. & Labuschagne, W. (2006). Hintikka’s Alternatives. Junctures, 6, June 2006:35–43.
  29. Ioannides J.P.A. (2021). How the pandemic is changing the norms of science. Available from: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/pandemic-science
  30. Irving, E. (2023). Oxford University’s other diversity crisis. The Economist. 1 March. Available from: https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/03/01/oxford-universitys-other-diversity-crisis
  31. Jansen, J. (2010). The slow death of the intellect. Mail & Guardian online. 27 August.
  32. Jansen, J. (2023). Corrupted: A study of chronic dysfunction in South African universities. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
  33. John, B. (2021). Consumer insights through the lens of strategic communication. In Strategic Communication, South African Perspectives pp. 447–469. Edited by S. Verwey, D.R. Benecke & T. Phumo. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
  34. Jordan, J. & M. Sorrell. (2019). Why reverse mentoring works and how to do it right. Harvard Business Review, 3 October.
  35. Max-Neef M.A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(1):5–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014
  36. McGilchrist, I. & Sayers, F. (2023). Left-brain thinking will destroy civilization. Unherd. 30 April. Available from: https://unherd.com/?p=472013?tl_inbound=1&tl_groups[0]=18743&tl_period_type=3&mc_cid=0210767d38&mc_eid=debd292081
  37. McKinsey Quarterly. May (2020). Reimagining the post-pandemic organisation. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-post-pandemic-organization
  38. Metamoderna (2023). What is metamodernism? Available from: https://metamoderna.org/metamodernism/
  39. Meyer, I. & Barker, R. (2020). A metamodern model for managing stakeholder relationships in non-profit organisations. Communicare, 39(1):56–70.
  40. Meyer, I. (2021). The resurrection of modernistic public relations – a metamodern perspective. Journal for Communication Studies, 14,1(27): 5–36.
  41. Milmo, D. (2023). Elon Musk fires additional 200 people at Twitter, report says. The Guardian, 27 February.
  42. Morapeli, S. (2016). Scientific paradigms and the discipline of Strategic Communication. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/43136393/Scientific_paradigms_and_the_discipline_of_StrategicCommunication
  43. Morin, E. (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems. 15(4):371–385
  44. Morin, E. (2007). Restricted complexity, general complexity.In: Worldviews, Science and Us: Philosophy and Complexity, pp. 10–11. Edited by C. Gershenson, D. Aerts & B. Edmonds. Singapore: World Scientific.
  45. Muir, C. (2023) Corporate sustainability and making meaning of organisational purpose: A case study of South African medical aid providers. Unpublished doctoral manuscript in progress. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
  46. Noble, S.M., Mende, M., Grewal, D. & Parasuraman, A. (2022). The Fifth Industrial Revolution: How harmonious human–machine collaboration is triggering a retail and service [r]evolution. Journal of Retailing. 98:199–208
  47. Nonaka, I. (2007). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review Press. Available from: https://hbr.org/2007/07/the-knowledge-creating-company
  48. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  49. O’Regan, T. (2018). Between exacerbation and alleviation? Media in transition, social transformation and inclusiveness. Communicare, 37(2):1–16.
  50. Overton-de Klerk, N. & Azionya, C. (2020). The world is drowning in Covid-19 communication but isn’t march smarter for it. Daily Maverick, 12 October.
  51. Overton-de Klerk, N. & Muir, C. (2022). Corporate brand reputation and ethic, sustainability and inclusion. From corporate brand reputation to corporate sustainability. In The Emerald Handbook of Multi-Stakeholder Communication, pp. 365–391. Edited by P. Foroudi, B. Nguyen & T.C. UK: Bingley. Emerald Publishing.
  52. Overton-de Klerk, N. & Sienaert, M. (2016). From research excellence to brand relevance: A model for higher education reputation building. South African Journal of Science, 112(5/6), Art. #2015-0365. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/ sajs.2016/20150365
  53. Overton-de Klerk N. & Verwey, S. (2013). Towards an emerging paradigm of strategic communication: Core driving forces. Communicatio, 39(3):362–382.
  54. Pawson, R. (2020). The coronavirus response: Boxed in by models. Evaluation, 1–19.
  55. Putnam, R. & Garrett, S.R. (2020). The upswing: How America came together a century ago and how we can do it again. UK: Simon & Schuster.
  56. Ramphele, M., Vogel, C. & Reddy, D. (2022). Special SFSA Plenary debate; the future of transdisciplinarity; how do we relearn to be human in new ways. South African Journal of Science, 2022(18):20–23. (Special Issue: Radical Reason).
  57. Ricca, M. (2020). Interbrand - Beyond the storm: A new decade of possibility. Available from: https://interbrand.com/thinking/beyond-the-storm-a-new-decade-of-possibility/
  58. Schoeneborn, D. & Vasquez, C. (2017). Communication as constitutive of organization. In International Encyclopaedia of Organizational Communication. Edited by C.R. Scott & L.K. Lewis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  59. Seekings, J. & Natrass, N. (2022). Available from: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2022-10-17-resisting-the-rise-of-anti-democratic-authoritarian-managerialism-at-university-of-cape-town/
  60. Scott, K. (2019). Radical Candor. How to get what you want by saying what you mean. London: Pan Books.
  61. Storm, J.A.J. (2021). Metamodernism: The future of theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  62. Tomaselli, K. (2018a). Science vs. constructivism: Creating or finding reality. In Making sense of research, pp. 290–315. Edited by K. Tomaselli. eBook. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
  63. Tomaselli, K. (2018b). A self-reflexive analysis of Communicare: Interparadigmatic repositioning. Communicare, 37(2):17–30
  64. Tomaselli. K. & Caldwell, M. (2019). Corporate communication—adversarial, transmission, dialogical. Communicatio, 45(2):56–80.
  65. Vermeulen, T. & Van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 2:1–14. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677
  66. Verwey, S. (2015). Paradigms, perspectives and practice of public relations and communication: Implications for ‘disciplined imagination’ in South African scholarship. Communitas, 20:1–25.
  67. Verwey, S. & Benecke, DR. (2021). Paradigms, perspectives and paradoxes. In Strategic Communication. South African Perspectives, pp. 5–32. Edited by S. Verwey, D.R. Benecke and T. Phumo. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
How to Cite
Reflections on the current state and future of strategic communication as paradigm and practice. (2023). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 42(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v42i1.2486

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
    • Clarivate