Purpose and practice: Educating PR professionals for the future

Educating PR professionals for the future

Sonja Verwey
University of Johannesburg
René Benecke
University of Johannesburg
Clarissa Muir
University of Johannesburg
Share:

How to Cite

Purpose and practice: Educating PR professionals for the future. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 36(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v36i1.1587
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 13, 2022
  • Published: October 17, 2022

Abstract

Business thinking, engagement with stakeholders, and the practice of public relations have
all been confronted with major paradigmatic shifts – especially as these are contextualized by
environments that are increasingly pluralistic. This has contributed to an important question into
what the education of future public relations practitioners (PRPs) should be so that they can
purposefully and successfully navigate and negotiate the challenges of decision-making – that
are ethical and moral in nature – in the context of complex, and diverse practice. In light of
this, public relations curriculum developers and educators are challenged to address issues of
purpose, values-based practice and education in order to prepare future PRPs for the ethical and
moral challenges that they will encounter. In the South African context this is further complicated
by the recent calls for decolonisation of South African public relations curricula. This conceptual
and exploratory paper addresses the issue of practice in an age of purpose, the changing roles of
public relations practitioners, and the contribution values-based education can make in addressing
demands for revised, and decolonised PR curricula.

References

  1. Baker, G. (2017). The case for shared purpose. How it enhances company performance and value. Available from: http://www.bakerbrand.com/how-shared-purpose-benefits-corporateperformance/
  2. Barman, C. R. (1980). Four values education approaches. The American Biology Teacher, 43(3): 152-156.
  3. https://doi.org/10.2307/4446858
  4. Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2001). The postmodern adventure. Science, technology, and cultural studies at the third millennium. New York: Guilford.
  5. Boyd, J. & Van Slette, S. H. (2009). Outlaw discourse as postmodern public relations. In Heath, R. L., Toth, E., & Waymer, D. Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations. New York, NY: Routledge.
  6. De Aurago, J. & Beal, R. (2013). Professionalism as reputation capital: The moral imperative in the global financial crisis. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99: 351 - 362.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.503
  8. Edwards, M. (2005). The Integral Holon. A holonomic approach to organisational change and transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management 18(3): 269-288.
  9. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810510599425
  10. Edwards, L. (2012). Defining the object of Public Relations research. A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry, 1: 313-335.
  11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X12448583
  12. Elmer, P. (2011). Public relations and storytelling. In Edwards, L., & Hodges, C. (Eds.) Public relations, society and culture: Theoretical and empirical explorations.), pp. 47-61. London: Routledge.
  13. Garuba, H. (2015). What is an African curriculum? Retrieved from http://mg.co.za/article/201-04-17-what-is-an-african-curriculum
  14. Grunig, J. (2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. Prism, 6(2): 1-19.
  15. Harrison, K. & Galloway, C. (2005). Public relations ethics: A simpler (but not simplistic) approach to the complexities. Prism, 3. Available from: http://praxis.massey.ac.nz
  16. Hodges, C. (2006). "PRP culture": A framework for exploring public relations practitioners as cultural intermediaries. Journal of Communication Management, 10 (1): 80 - 93.
  17. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540610646391
  18. Hodges, C. E. M. (2011). Public relations, society and culture: Theoretical and empirical explorations. In Edwards, L., & Hodges, C (Eds). London, UK: Routledge.
  19. Holtzhausen, D. R. (2012). Public relations as activism. Postmodern approaches to theory and practice (1st ed). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
  20. Holtzhausen, D. R. (2015). The unethical consequences of professional communication codes of ethics: A postmodern analysis of ethical decision-making in communication practice. Public Relations Review, 41:769-776.
  21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.008
  22. Holtzhausen, D. R. & Voto, R. (2002). Resistance from the margins: The Postmodern Public Relations Practitioner as Organisational Activist. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1): 57-84.
  23. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_3
  24. Johns, C. (2006). E-thics the new moral methodology for business. Journal of Investment Compliance. Vol 7 (1): 83-90.
  25. https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810610690260
  26. Keller, V. (2015). The business case for purpose. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-the-business-case-for-purpose/$FILE/ey-the-business-case-for-purpose.pdf
  27. McKie, D., & Willis, P. (2015). Advancing tendencies? PR leadership, general leadership and leadership pedagogy. PR Review, 41: 628-635.
  28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.020
  29. McLean, C. (2011). The yellow brick road: A values based curriculum model. Nurse Education in Practice, 12: 159-163.
  30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.11.002
  31. Mortimer, M. (2005). Edward Said and Assa Djebar: A contrapuntal reading. Research in African Literature, 36(3): 53-67.
  32. https://doi.org/10.2979/RAL.2005.36.3.53
  33. Mizzi, R. C., Rocco, T. S., & Shore, S. (2016). Disrupting adult and community education: Teaching, learning, and working in the periphery. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
  34. Mourkogiannis, N. (2014). Purpose: The Starting Point of Great Companies. New York, NY: St Martin's Griffin.
  35. Neill, M. S., & Drumwright, M. E. (2012). PR Professionals as Organizational Conscience. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 27(4): 220-234.
  36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2012.746108
  37. Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65:45-56.
  38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002
  39. Ruf, H. L. (2005). Postmodern rationality, social criticism, and religion. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
  40. Rumbsy, I. (2016). Purpose: Its relevance, meaning and the opportunity it presents us. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/ICCO/the-relationship-between-brand-purpose-and-brandcommunication
  41. Sellman, D. (2009). Ten years of nursing philosophy. Nursing Philosophy. 10(4): 229-302.
  42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00418.x
  43. Steyn, B. (2009). Strategic role of public relations in strategic reflection. American Behavioral Scientist. 53: 516-532.
  44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209347628
  45. Verwey, S. (2010). Reconceptualising the role of the communication professional in a postmodern context. Academy of World Business, Marketing and Management Development Conference Proceedings, 4(1): 193-207.
  46. Verwey, S. (2015). Paradigms, perspectives and practice of public relations and comunication: Implications for 'disciplined imagination' in South African scholarship. Communitas, 20(1): 1-25.
  47. Wang, G. (2014). Culture, paradigm, and communication theory: A matter of boundary or commensurability? Communication Theory, 24: 373-393.
  48. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12045
  49. Woodbridge, K., & Fulford, K. W. M. (2004). 'Whose Values?' - A workbook for values based practice in mental health care. London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
How to Cite
Purpose and practice: Educating PR professionals for the future. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 36(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v36i1.1587

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate