A purposeful multi-stakeholder learning dialogue (PMSLD) approach to mitigate high-conflict collective bargaining

Pay Shabangu | Bio
University of Johannesburg
Corné Meintjes | Bio
University of Johannesburg
Siphelo Ngcwangu | Bio
University of Johannesburg
Share:
  • Articles
  • Submited: August 4, 2022
  • Published: December 15, 2022

Abstract

Strikes and labour issues have caused havoc both locally and globally over the last decade. Social dialogue in the form of collective bargaining has not been successful in addressing these issues as labour conflict persists, highlighting the need for improved multi-stakeholder engagement. This paper explores stakeholder engagement from the perspective of collective bargaining in the context of the South African Local Government Bargaining Council (SALGBC). Using an interpretivist paradigm, the research used exploratory, descriptive, and qualitative research to uncover a misalignment between what the SALGBC envisions stakeholder engagement to be and how it is experienced by the relevant parties. Stakeholders in the SALGBC perceive the employer's engagement as conducted in bad faith, coercive, lacking consultation, and accepting industrial action as engagement. To address these, a purposeful multi-stakeholder learning dialogue (PMSLD) is proposed, that blends dialogic communication and dialogic orientation with stakeholders who are receptive, reciprocal and valued for their social roles.

 

References

  1. Abosag, I., Yen, D.A. & Barner, B R. (2016). 'What is dark about the dark side of business relationships?'. Industrial Marketing Management, 55: 5–9.
  2. Alby, P., Azam, J.& Rospabé, S. (2005). Labor institutions, labor-management relations, and social dialogue in Africa. The World Bank. Available from: World Bank Document (ut-capitole.fr) (Accessed: 1 August 2022).
  3. Alqaisi, F. (2018). The effects of stakeholder's engagement and communication management on projects success. MATEC Web of Conferences, 162: 1–6.
  4. Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B. & Rahman, S.S. (2002). Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
  5. Anstey, M.E., Grogan, J. & Ngcukaitobi, T. (2011). Collective bargaining in the workplace. Claremont, South Africa: Juta.
  6. Antonacopoulou, E. & Méric, J. (2005). A critique of stakeholder theory: Management science or a sophisticated ideology of control?. Corporate Governance, 5: 22–33. 10.1108/14720700510562631.
  7. Arseo, S.E. (2021). School (districts) of democracy: Collective stakeholder engagement under California's local control funding formula. University of California, Davis. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/school-districts-democracy-collective-stakeholder/docview/2598677993/se-2?accountid=13425
  8. Barge, J.K. & Little, M. (2002). No Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organisational life. Communication Theory, 12(4): 375–397.
  9. Bendix, S. (2019). Labour Relations: A southern African perspective. 7th edition. Cape Town: Juta.
  10. Bezuidenhout, M.C. (2016). Managing for healthy labour relations: a practical guide for health services in Southern Africa. 3rd edition. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
  11. Botha, Y. (2019). A balancing act: Stakeholder enablement and empowerment towards multiple stakeholder engagement. In International Conference on Business and Management Dynamics ICBMD-2019, pp. 24–37. Edited by Twum-Darko. Swakopmund, Namibia, Available from: https://icbmd.org.za/documents/ICBMD-2019-Proceeding.pdf
  12. Botha, Y. (2021). Extending polyphonic strategic communication to stakeholder engagement: Exploring deliberate-emergent and radical-emergent approaches, Management Dynamics. Management Dynamics, 30(2): 1-14.
  13. Botha, Y. & Meintjes, C. (2021). Relational capital through strategic stakeholder engagement. In Strategic Communication: South African Perspectives, pp. 222–242. Edited by Benecke, D.R., Verwey, S. & Phumo, T. 1st edition. OUP Southern Africa: Cape Town.
  14. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3: 77–101.
  15. Bridoux, F. & Stoelhorst, J.W. (2016) Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 229–251.
  16. Bridoux, F. & Stoelhorts, J.W. (2022). Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organisation: Past, present, and future. Strategic Organization, 20(4): 797-809.
  17. Bridoux, F. & Vishwanathan, P. (2020) When do powerful stakeholders give managers the latitude to balance all stakeholders' interests? Business & Society, 59(2): 232–262.
  18. Buber, M. (1970). I and thou. New York: Scribner.
  19. Cillié, G. (2018). Why SA labour relations are the worst in the world. Bizcommunity, Management & Leadership, 7 May. Available from: https://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/610/176736.html#:~:text=South Africa has the worst labour-employee relations. In Report 2017-2018 released by the World Economic Forum.
  20. Clarke, A.R. (2007). Public service labour relations: centralised collective bargaining and social dialogue in the public service of South Africa (1997 to 2007). University of the Western Cape.
  21. Creighton, B., Denvir, C. & McCrystal, S. (2017). Defining industrial action. Federal law review, 45(3): 383–414.
  22. Dawkins, C.E. (2014). The principle of Good Faith: Toward substantive stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 12 (1): 283–295.
  23. Donaldson, T. & Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.
  24. Dühring, L. & Zerfass, A. (2021). The triple role of communications in agile organisations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(2): 93–112.
  25. Du Toit, D. (2007). What is the future of collective bargaining (and Labour Law) in South Africa?. Juta Law, 28.
  26. De Wet, L. (1987). Collective bargaining at local government level with particular reference to Natal. Masters of Public Administration. [Unpublished]: University of Durban-Westville. Retrieved from: De Wet_Leonardus_1987.pdf;sequence=1 (ukzn.ac.za) (Accessed on 12 December 2022).
  27. Finnemore, M. (2013). Introduction to labour relations in South Africa. 11th edition. Durban: LexisNexis.
  28. Finnemore, M. & Koekemoer, G.M. (2018). Introduction to Labour Relations in South Africa. 12th edition. Durban: LexisNexis.
  29. Fox, M. (2006). Managing Organisational Behaviour. Cape Town: Juta.
  30. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA.: Pitman.
  31. Freeman, R., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B. & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Freeman, R.E., Kujala, J. & Sachs, S. (2017). Stakeholder engagement: Clinical research cases. Berlin: Springer.
  33. Freeman, R.E. & Phillips, R.A. (2002) Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3): 331–349.
  34. French, P.E. (2011). Enhancing the legitimacy of local government pandemic influenza planning through transparency and public engagement. In Public Administration Review, 71(2): 253–264.
  35. Friedman, A.L & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. USA: Oxford University Press.
  36. Godfrey, S., Maree, J. du Toit, D. & Theron, J. (2010). Collective bargaining in South Africa, past, present and future? Claremont, South Africa: Juta.
  37. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. In Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 315–327. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y
  38. Hallahan, K. (2015). Organizational Goals and Communication Objectives in Strategic Communication. In The Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication. Edited by D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass. New York: Routledge.
  39. Head, T. (2021). Major strike set to leave parts of Gauteng "without water" from Wednesday. The South African, 20 April. Available at: https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/where-gauteng-water-shortage-wednesday-strike-action-what-time/
  40. Heald, G. (2016). Why is collective bargaining failing in South Africa: A reflection on how to restore social dialogue in South Africa. Randburg: KR Publishing.
  41. Heath, R.L. (2014). Public relations' role in engagement: functions, voices and narratives. In ICA Preconference 2014 on Engagement as Strategy, Theory and Practice. Seattle.
  42. Hodges, J. (2019). Employee Engagement for Organisational Change: The theory and practice of Stakeholder Engagement. London: Routledge.
  43. Jensen, T. & Sandström, J. (2013). In defence of stakeholder pragmatism. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2): 225–237.
  44. Jones, T.M. (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437.
  45. Jones, T.M. & Wicks, A.C. (1999). Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 206–221.
  46. Kaptein, M. & Van Tulder, R. (2003). Toward effective stakeholder dialogue. Business and Society Review, 108(2): 203–224.
  47. Katz, H.C. & Kockhan, T.A. (2000). An Introduction to Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations. 2nd edition. Pennsylvania: McGraw Hill.
  48. Kent, M.L. & Lane, A.B. (2017). A rhizomatous metaphor for dialogic theory. Public Relations Review, 43(3): 568–578. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.017
  49. Kent, M.L., Taylor, M. & White, W.J. (2003). The relationship between Web site design and organisational responsiveness to stakeholders. Public Relations Review, 29: 63–77.
  50. Key, S. (1999). Toward a new theory of the firm: a critique of stakeholder “theory”. Management Decision, 37(4).
  51. Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H. Heikkinen, A. & Laude, D. (2022). 'Stakeholder Engagement : Past, Present, and Future'. Business & Society, 61(5): 1136-1196. doi: 10.1177/00076503211066595
  52. Lane, A.B. (2020). The dialogic ladder: toward a framework of dialogue. Public Relations Review, 46: 101870.
  53. Lane, A. & Kent, M.L. (2018). Dialogic engagement. In The Handbook of Communication Engagement. pp. 61–75. Edited by Johnston, K. & Taylor, M. 1st edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
  54. Lange, D., Bundy, J. & Park, E. (2022) The social nature of stakeholder utility. Academy of Management Review 47(1): 9–30.
  55. Lee, S.T. & Desai, M.H. (2014). Dialogic communication and media relations in non- governmental organisations. Journal of Communication Management, 18(1): 80–100.
  56. Levinas, E. (1989). The Levinas Reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  57. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California: SAGE Publications Inc.
  58. Linstead, S., Maréchal, G. & Griffin, R.W. (2014). Theorizing and Researching the Dark Side of Organization. Organization Studies, 35(2): 165–188.
  59. Lock, I. (2019). Explicating communicative organisation-stakeholder relationships in the digital age: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Relations Review, 45(4). 101829 doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101829
  60. Madlala, P.C. (2017). Collective engagement and stakeholder strategy for harmonious labour relations in a mining organisation. MPhil. (Employment Relations) [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: Collective engagement and stakeholder strategy for harmonious labour relations in a mining organisation - University of Johannesburg (uj.ac.za) (Accessed: 12 December 2022).
  61. Madlala, P.C. & Govender, C.M. (2018). Current collective engagement stakeholder strategies for South African labour relations. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16: 1–9. doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.909
  62. Maharaj, R. (2008). Critiquing and contrasting “moral” stakeholder theory and “strategic” stakeholder: implications for the board of directors. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8(2): 115-127.
  63. Mansell, S.F. (2013). Capitalism, corporations and the social contract: A critique of stakeholder theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Mato-Santiso, V., Rey-García, M. & Sanzo-Pérez, M.J. (2021). Managing multi-stakeholder relationships in nonprofit organisations through multiple channels: A systematic review and research agenda for enhancing stakeholder relationship marketing. Public Relations Review, 47(4): 102074.
  65. Meintjes, C. (2021). The authentic corporate citizen: The role of relational transparency and stakeholder relationship cultivation strategies. Management Dynamics, 30(3): 1–17.
  66. Meyer, I. (2017). A metamodern stakeholder relationship management model for non-profit organisations. DPhil (Communication). [Unpublished]: University of South Africa. Retrieved from: A metamodern stakeholder relationship management model for non-profit organisations (unisa.ac.za) (Accessed on 12 December 2022).
  67. Meyer, I. & Barker, R. (2020). A metamodern model for managing stakeholder relationships in non-profit organisations. Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 39(1): 56-79.
  68. Morsing, M. & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4): 323–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
  69. Musgrave, A. (2014). Art of collective bargaining in SA is at crisis point. Available from: https://www.iol.co.za/business-report/economy/art-of-collective-bargaining-in-sa-is-at-crisis-point-1652698 (Accessed: 3 December 2019).
  70. Ni, N., Qian, C. & Crilly, D. (2014) The stakeholder enterprise: Caring for the community by attending to employees. Strategic Organization, 12(1): 38–61.
  71. Nel, P.S., Kirsten, M., Swanepoel, B.J., Erasmus, B.J. & Jordaan, B. (2016). South African Employment Relations: Theory and Practice. 8th edition. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
  72. Nienaber, H. & Martins, N. (2016). Employee engagement in a South African context. Randburg: KR Publishing.
  73. Okazaki, S., Plangger, K., Roulet, T. & Benito, H.M. (2020).'Assessing stakeholder network engagement. European Journal of Marketing, 55(5): 1359–1384. doi: 10.1108/EJM-12-2018-0842
  74. O'Riordan, L. & Fairbrass, J. (2014). Managing CSR stakeholder engagement: A new conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 121–145.
  75. Ostash, D.A. (2017). Best practices of California school districts implementing LCFF and LCAP through the collective bargaining agreement: A multiple case. Azusa Pacific University. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/best-practices-california-school-districts/docview/1986473159/se-2?accountid=13425 (Accessed on 1 August 2022).
  76. Overton-de Klerk, N. & Verwey, S. (2013). Towards an emerging paradigm of strategic communication: Core driving forces. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 39:3, 362-382, doi: 10.1080/02500167.2013.837626
  77. Parsons, R. (2007).'The emergence of institutionalised social dialogue in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 75(1): 1-21.
  78. Partridge, K., Wheeler, D., Zohar, A. & Jackson, C. (2005). Manual for stakeholder engagement. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Division of Technology, Industry and Economics. New York.
  79. Passetti, E., Bianchi, L. Battaglia, M. & Frey, M. (2019). When Democratic Principles are not Enough: Tensions and Temporalities of Dialogic Stakeholder Engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1): 173–190. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3500-z
  80. Patton, M. (2002). Impact-driven qualitative research and evaluation. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  81. Payne, S.L. & Calton, J.M. (2002). Towards a managerial practice of stakeholder engagement. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 6(6): 37–52.
  82. Phillips, R., Freeman, R.E. & Wicks, A.C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business ethics quarterly, 13(4): 479–502.
  83. Prasad, V.V.D. (2009). Collective bargaining – its relationship to stakeholders. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(2): 195–202.
  84. Sachs, S, & Rühli, E. (2011). Stakeholders matter: A new paradigm for strategy in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  85. Sommerfeldt, E J. & Yang, A. (2018). Notes on a dialogue: twenty years of digital dialogic communication research in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research. Routledge, pp. 59–64. doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498248
  86. South African Local Government Bargaining Council (2015) Main Collective Agreement. SALGA. Available from: https://salgbc.org.za/wpfd_file/maincollectiveagreement2015/
  87. SALGBC Constitution, (2007). Constitution of the South African Local Government Bargaining Council. Retrieved from: salgbc_new_constitution – SALGBC (6 July 2022)
  88. Srinivasa, C. (2020). How to handle conflicts and collective bargaining? Independently published.
  89. Taylor, M. & Kent, M.L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5): 384–398.
  90. Thizy, D., Emergson, C., Gibbs, J., Hartley, S., Kapiriri, L, Lavery, J. Lunshof, J., Ramsey, J., Shapiro, J., Toe, L.P., Coche, I. & Robinson, B. (2019). Guidance on Stakeholder engagement practices to inform the development of area-wide vector control methods. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13(4): e0007286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007286
  91. Uysal, N. (2018). On the relationship between dialogic communication and corporate social performance: advancing dialogic theory and research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3): 100–114. doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498344
  92. Venter, R. & Levy, A. (2014). Labour Relations in South Africa. 5th edition. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
  93. Vermeulen, T. & Van der Akker, A. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 2:1–14.
  94. Webster, E. (2015). The shifting boundaries of industrial relations: Insights from South Africa. International Labour Review, 154(1): 27–36.
  95. Weiss, A.R. (1995). Cracks in the foundation of stakeholder theory. Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory, 1(1), pp.1-13.
  96. Wells, D.D. (2018). From collective bargaining to collective begging: State expansion and restriction of collective bargaining rights in the public sector. Kent State University. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/collective-bargaining-begging-state-expansion/docview/2515155719/se-2?accountid=13425
  97. Winkler, P. & Wehmeier, S. (2018). On Harrison White: Rethinking relations in public relations. In Public relations and social theory. pp. 137–152. Edited by Ihlen, Ø. & Fredriksson, M. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
  98. World Economic Forum. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Index Report 2017-2018, World Economic Forum (WEF). Available from: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110008131965/
  99. Writer, S. (2021). Major municipal strike on the cards for South Africa as unions "gears up for war". Businesstech, 24 June. Available from: https://businesstech.co.za/news/government/500737/major-municipal-strike-on-the-cards-for-south-africa-as-union-gears-up-for-war/
  100. Yin, R.K. (2016). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. 2nd edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
How to Cite
A purposeful multi-stakeholder learning dialogue (PMSLD) approach to mitigate high-conflict collective bargaining. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 41(2), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i2.1390

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate