Harnessing stakeholder sentiment on social networking sites: a new conceptual framework for online reputation management

a new conceptual framework for online reputation management

Hilke Steenkamp
Tshwane University of Technology
Ronél Rensburg
University of Pretoria
Share:

How to Cite

Harnessing stakeholder sentiment on social networking sites: a new conceptual framework for online reputation management. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 35(2), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v35i2.1597
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 14, 2022
  • Published: October 17, 2022

Abstract

Communicating reputation to stakeholders and assessing whether these messages have been
received favourably are essential components of organisations’ overall communication strategies.
These actions are, however, becoming increasingly difficult to execute as a result of sophisticated
stakeholder expectations as well as notions of continuous stakeholder participation and
engagement on social networking sites (SNSs) by means of the co-creation of communication
content. This research proposes a new conceptual framework for reputation management on
SNSs that aims to address these issues. The framework is essentially based on the utilisation of
computer-aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) such as Leximancer and Centim
in the reputation management process. Based on the findings, it is suggested that CAQDAS
enables reputation managers to accurately measure stakeholder sentiment, identify prevalent
stakeholder discourses pertaining to organisational communication disseminated on SNSs, and
detect threats that could damage corporate reputation.

References

  1. Adelstein, J. (2008). Discourse, dogma, and domination: knowledge work as art and politics. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ultimo: University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved April 15, 2014, from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/20046
  2. Adler, P.S. & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1):17-40.
  3. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922314
  4. Assiouras, I., Ozgen, O. & Skourtis, G. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility in food industry in product-harm crises. British Food Journal, 115(1):108-123.
  5. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701311289902
  6. Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press South Africa.
  7. Balmer, J.M.T. & Greyser, S.A. (2006). Integrating corporate identity, corporate branding, corporate communications, corporate image and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8):730-741.
  8. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610669964
  9. Boulstridge, E. & Carrigan, M. (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4):355-368.
  10. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb023532
  11. boyd, d.m. & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13:210-230.
  12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  13. Brønn, P.C. & Vrioni, A.B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: an overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20:207-222.
  14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2001.11104887
  15. Brown, J., Broderick, A.J. & Lee, N. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualising the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3):1-19.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20082
  17. Burns, R.B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). London: SAGE.
  18. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  19. Cho, S. & Huh, J. (2010). Content analysis of corporate blogs as a relationship management tool. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1):30-48.
  20. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011016822
  21. Cone, E. (2007). Social networks at work promise bottom-line results. Retrieved November 1, 2012, from http://www.cioinsight.com/c/a/Trends/Social-Networks-at-Work-PromisebrBottomLine-Results
  22. Consulta. (2014). Sentiment and text analytics. s.l.: s.n.
  23. Coombs, T. & Holladay, S. (2015). CSR as crisis risk: expanding how we conceptualise the relationship. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2):144-162.
  24. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-10-2013-0078
  25. Coombs, W.T. (2007). Protecting organisation reputations during a crisis: the development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3):163-176.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
  27. Crofts, K. & Bisman, J. (2010). Interrogating accountability: an illustration of the use of Leximancer software for qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(2):180-207.
  28. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091011050859
  29. Derwall, J. (2007). The economic virtues of SRI and CSR. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/8986
  30. Doorley, J. & Garcia, H.F. (2011). Reputation management: the key to successful public relations and corporate communication (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  31. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876862
  32. Duncan, R.D. (2012). The role of online social networks in inter-firm collaborative innovation and problem solving. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Pretoria: University of South Africa, South Africa.
  33. Engelbrecht, M. (2012). The art of shapeshifting: facilitating strategic foresight to independent non-executive directors - a strategic approach to corporate governance in SA. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
  34. Floreddu, P., Cabiddu, F. & Evaristo, R. (2014). Inside your social media ring: How to optimise online corporate reputation. Business Horizons, 57(6):737-745.
  35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.07.007
  36. Fombrun, C.J. & Gardberg, N. (2000). Who's tops in corporate reputation? Corporate Reputation Review, 3(1):13-17.
  37. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540095
  38. Fombrun, C.J. & Rindova, V.P. (1998). Reputation management in global 1000 firms: a benchmarking study. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(3):205-212.
  39. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540044
  40. Fombrun, C.J. & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(2):233-258.
  41. https://doi.org/10.5465/256324
  42. Fombrun, C.J. & Van Riel, C.B.M. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1):5-13.
  43. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540008
  44. Gillan, S.L. & Starks, L.T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership and the role of institutional investors: a global perspective. Journal of Applied Finance, 13(2):4-22.
  45. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.439500
  46. Hamann, R. & Kapelus, P. (2004). Corporate social responsibility in mining in southern Africa: fair accountability or just greenwash? Development, 47(3):85-92.
  47. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100056
  48. Hart, L. (2011). Social media. In J. Doorley & H.F. Garcia (Eds.), Reputation management: the key to successful public relations and corporate communication (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  49. Hoffmann, C.P. & Lutz, C. (2015). The impact of online media on stakeholder engagement and the governance of corporations. Journal of Public Affairs, 15(2):163-174.
  50. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1535
  51. Holstein, J.A. & Gubrium, J.F. (2003). Inside interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  52. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984492
  53. Ind, N. & Riondino, M. (2001). Branding on the web: a real revolution? Journal of Brand Management, 5(1):8-19.
  54. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540048
  55. Kivunja, C. (2013). Qualitative data mining and knowledge discovery using Leximancer digital software. Lecture Notes on Information Theory, 1(1):53-55.
  56. https://doi.org/10.12720/lnit.1.1.53-55
  57. Leximancer. (2011). Leximancer manual version 4. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5C839s5ldfMJ:https://www.leximancer.com/site-media/lm/science/Leximancer_Manual_Version_4_0.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=za
  58. Lyon, D. (2006). 9/11, synopticon, and scopophilia: watching and being watched. In K. Haggerty & R. Ericson (Eds.), The new politics of surveillance and visibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  59. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442681880-003
  60. Morsing, M. & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4):323-338.
  61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
  62. North, E. & Enslin, C. (2004). Building brands through alternative brand contact communications. Communicatio, 30(1):151-165.
  63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500160408537991
  64. Penn-Edwards, S. (2010). Computer aided phenomenography: the role of Leximancer computer software in phenomenographic investigation. The Qualitative Report, 15(2):252-267.
  65. Porter, M.E., Lorsch, J.W. & Nohria, N. (2004). Seven surprises for new CEOs. Harvard Business Review, 82(10):62-72.
  66. Qualman, E. (2013). Socialnomics: how social media transforms the way we live and do business. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
  67. Rindova, V.P. & Fombrun, C.J. (1999). Constructing competitive advantage: the role of firmconstituent interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8):691-710.
  68. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199908)20:8<691::AID-SMJ48>3.0.CO;2-1
  69. Rindova, V.P., Petkova, A.P. & Kotha, S. (2007). Standing out: how new firms in emerging markets build reputation. Strategic Organisation, 5(1):31-70.
  70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127006074389
  71. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
  72. Smith, A.E. (2003, May/June). Automatic extraction of semantic networks from texts using Leximancer. Paper presented at the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Edmonton, Canada. Retrieved April 15, 2014, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1073439&picked=formats&CFID=771876585&CFTOKEN=57597460
  73. Smith, A.E. & Humphreys, M.S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2):262-27.
  74. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192778
  75. Snowden, D. (2005). From atomism to networks in social systems. The Learning Organisation, 12(6):2-11.
  76. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470510626757
  77. Tokar, B. (1997). Earth for sale: reclaiming ecology in the age of corporate greenwash. Boston, Massachusetts: South End Press. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from http://www.social-ecology.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/brian3.Earth_for_Sale-Trading_Earth.pdf
  78. Typaldos, C. (2000). The 12 principles of collaboration. Retrieved October 28, 2012, from http://www.digitalplaces.biz/pages/12Principles-Collaboration.pdf
  79. Van Riel, C.B.M. (1997). Research in corporate communication: an overview of an emerging field. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(2):288-309.
  80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318997112005
  81. Van Riel, C.B.M. (2012). The alignment factor: leveraging the power of total stakeholder support. Retrieved September 28, 2014, from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:btWSR0xHITEJ:www.bi.edu/cccFiles/seminarer/RI_Magazine_main%2520article.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=za
  82. Van Riel, C.B.M. (2013). Corporate reputation and the discipline of public opinion. In C.E. Carroll (Ed.), The handbook of communication and corporate reputation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  83. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118335529.ch2
  84. Vasalou, A., Hopfensitz, A. & Pitt, J.V. (2008). In praise of forgiveness: ways for repairing trust breakdowns in one-off online interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66:466-480.
  85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.02.001
  86. Williams, C.A. & Aguilera, R.V. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in a comparative perspective. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:S7vDdr-S38IJ:www.business.illinois.edu/aguilera/pdf/Williams%2520Aguilera%2520OUPfinal%2520dec%25202006.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=za
  87. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0020
  88. Woodside, A.G. (2010). Brand-consumer storytelling theory and research: introduction to a Psychology & Marketing special issue. Psychology & Marketing, 27(6):531-540.
  89. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20342
How to Cite
Harnessing stakeholder sentiment on social networking sites: a new conceptual framework for online reputation management. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 35(2), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v35i2.1597

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate