The transparency of the South African Reserve Bank: a stakeholder approach

a stakeholder approach

Share:

How to Cite

The transparency of the South African Reserve Bank: a stakeholder approach. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 31(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v31i1.2073
  • Articles
  • Submited: November 10, 2022
  • Published: November 10, 2022

Abstract

The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) is a central bank. It is the public institution responsible
for managing the South African monetary policy. Any decisions taken by the bank and how these
decisions are communicated affect all the participants in the economic activity of the country.
This study undertook a thematic analysis of the media releases, monetary policy statements
and SARB Governors’ speeches delivered between 2008 and 2009. It revealed that the SARB,
through having achieved a relatively high level of economic and policy transparency, achieved
lower procedural and political transparency. The results also indicate that, despite there being an
increased demand for the accountability of organisations to a broad spectrum of stakeholders,
the SARB directs most of its communications to only a relatively limited group of stakeholders.

References

  1. Arnone, M., Laurens, B., Segalotto, J-F. & Sommers, M. (2009). Central bank autonomy: lessons from global trends. IMF Staff Papers, 56, (2), 263-296.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2008.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2008.25
  3. Bernanke, B.S. (2008). The Fed's road toward greater transparency. Cato Journal, 28, (2), 175-186.
  4. Bernanke, B.S., Laubach, T., Mishkin, F.S., & Posen, A.S. (1999). Missing the mark. The truth about inflation targeting. Foreign Affairs, September/October, 78, (5), 158-161.
  5. https://doi.org/10.2307/20049457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20049457
  6. Broaddus, J.A. (2001). Transparency in the practice of monetary policy. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 87, (3), 1-9.
  7. Choo, G. (2009). Audiences, stakeholders, publics, in R. Tench & L. Yeomans (Eds), Exploring public relations. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  8. Christensen, L.T. (2002). Corporate Communication: the challenge of transparency. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 7(3), 162-168.
  9. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210436772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210436772
  10. Christensen, L.T., Morsing, M. & Cheney, G. (2008). Corporate communication: convention complexity and critique. London: SAGE.
  11. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214466
  12. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). Stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, (1), 92-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
  13. https://doi.org/10.2307/258888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258888
  14. Clifton, D. & Amran, A. (2011). A stakeholder approach: sustainability perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 121-136.
  15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0538-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0538-6
  16. Collis, J. & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: a practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Crowe, C. & Meadee, E. (2008). Central Bank independence and transparency: evolution and effectiveness. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, (4), 763-777.
  18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.06.004
  19. Cukierman, A. (2002). Are contemporary central banks transparent about economic models and objectives and what difference does it make? Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, July/ August, 15-35.
  20. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2785121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2785121
  21. De Mendonca, F.H. & Filho, J.S. (2008). Macroeconomic effects on central bank transparency: the case of Brazil. Cato Journal, 28, (1), 117-139.
  22. Dennis, R. & Williams, J.C. (2007). Monetary policy, transparency and credibility: conference summary. FRBSF Economic Letter, 12, May 25, 1-3.
  23. Donaldson, T. & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, (1), 65-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
  24. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
  25. Dunham, L., Freeman, R.E. & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhancing stakeholders' practice: a particularised exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, (1), 23-42.
  26. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20061611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20061611
  27. Faust, J. & Svensson, L.E.O. (2001). Transparency and credibility: monetary policy with unobservable goals. International Economic Review, 42, (2), 369-398.
  28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2354.00114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2354.00114
  29. Florini, A.M. (2002). Increasing transparency in government. International Journal on World Peace, 19, (3), 3-35.
  30. Freeman, R.E. (2008). Ending so-called "Friedman-Freeman" debate, in B.A. Agle, T. Donaldson, R.E. Freeman, M.C. Jensen, R.K. Mitchell & D.J. Wood. Dialogue: toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, (2), 153-190.
  31. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214
  32. Gregory, A. (2009). Exploring public relations. In R. Tench & L. Yeomans (Eds). Harlow, England: Prentice-Hall.
  33. Hall, R.B. (2008). Credibility and intersubjectivity in global financial governance. 49th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, 26-29 March, Chicago, IL, USA.
  34. Issing, O. (2005). Communication, transparency, accountability: monetary policy in the twentyfirst century. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, Apr-May, 65-76.
  35. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.87.65-83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/r.87.65-83
  36. Johnson, G. & Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  37. Marcus, G. (2010). South African Reserve Bank shareholders: letter from the Governor. Retrieved April 7, 2011 from http://reservebank.co.za/internet/publication.nsf.
  38. Mitchell, D., Agle, B. & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle who really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, (4), 853-886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
  39. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
  40. Montes, G.C. (2010). Uncertainties, monetary policy and financial stability: challenges on inflation targeting. Brazilian Journal of Political Economics, 30, (1), 89-111.
  41. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572010000100006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572010000100006
  42. Osborne, D. (2004). Transparency and accountability reconsidered. Journal of Financial Crime, 11, (3), 292-300.
  43. https://doi.org/10.1108/13590790410809239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13590790410809239
  44. Parmar, B.L., Freeman, R.E., Harrison J.S., Wicks, A.C., Purnell, L. & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: the state of art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4, (1), 403-445.
  45. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495581
  46. Phillips, R., Freeman, E. & Wicks, A.C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, (4), 479-502.
  47. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313434
  48. Philips, D. & Young, P. (2009). Online public relations: a practical guide to developing an online strategy in the world of social media. London: Kogan Page.
  49. Poole, W. (2003). Fed transparency: how, not whether. The Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, November-December: 1-8.
  50. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.85.1-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/r.85.1-8
  51. Solomon, J. (2010). Corporate governance and accountability. (3rd Ed.) Chichester: Willey & Sons.
  52. Stasavage, D. (2003). Transparency, democratic accountability, and the economic consequences of monetary institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 47, (3), 389-402.
  53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00028
  54. Turdaliev, N. (2009). Transparency in monetary policy: a general equilibrium approach. Economic Modelling, 26, (3), 608-613.
  55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.01.001
  56. Walsh, J.P. (2005). Book review essay: taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30, (2), 426-452.
  57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387898
  58. Williams, J.C. (2010). Monetary policy in a low inflation economy with learning. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Economic Review: 1-12.
  59. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2006-30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2006-30
How to Cite
The transparency of the South African Reserve Bank: a stakeholder approach. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 31(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v31i1.2073

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate