'n Semiotiek van asiel/sitbetoging: : 'n interpretasie van die kine 3·gebeure

'n interpretasie van die kine 3·gebeure

Share:

How to Cite

’n Semiotiek van asiel/sitbetoging: : ’n interpretasie van die kine 3·gebeure. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 10(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v10i2.2011
  • Articles
  • Submited: November 7, 2022
  • Published: November 10, 2022

Abstract

This research has as its theme the sit-in by three persons staged in the USA consulate in Johannesburg in 1988. The event is studied from a semiotic perspective. The semiotic 'model' followed is eclectic as it is constituted by views drawn from inter alia Heidegger, Gadamer, Ricoeur, Benson, and particularly Eco. Two main readers were involved in the event, i.e. the governments of South Africa and the United States of America. The interpretation of the event by both governments cre ated a specific 'perception'/meaning in the minds of South Africa's (and the world's) population. This re search strives to establish which country's interpretation was ac cepted by the population in South Africa.

References

  1. BENSON, R W. (1987). The Serniotic Web of the Law. InKEVELSON, R (ed.), Law and semiotics, Vol I New York: Plenum Press.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0959-8_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0959-8_3
  3. BENSON, R W, (1988). The Semiotics of International Law: Interpretation of the ABM Treaty and of Nicaragua v. United States. Referaat by die Vierde Internasionale Colloquium oor Regssemiotiek (Penn State University, Pennsylvanial gelewer.
  4. ECO, U. (1979a). A theory of semiotics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  5. ECO, U. (19796). The role of the reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  6. GADAMER, H G. (1965). Wahrheit und methode, (Zweite Auflage), Tübingen: JCB Mohr (Paul Slebeck).
  7. HEIDEGGER, M, (1967). Sein und zeit. Oxford: Bazel Blackwell.
  8. RICOEUR, P. (1971). "What is a Text? Ex- planation and Interpretation". In RASMUSSEN, D M. Mythic-symbolic lan guage and philosophical anthropology: a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9327-6_7
  9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1114-8_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1114-8_7
  10. constructive Interpretation of the thought of Paul Ricoeur, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  11. RICOEUR, P. (1974). The conflicts of In terpretations: essays in hermeneutics (trans. ed. D. Ihdel, Evanston: Northwestern University press.
  12. RICOEUR, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. Forth Worth, Texas: The Texas Christian University Press.
  13. RICOEUR, P. (1978). The rule of metaphor: multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language (trans. R. Czerny), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  14. VAN DEN BERGH, NJ C, (1982). Die betekenis van die strukturele herme neutiek vir die uitleg van wette. (Onge publiseerde LLD-proefskrif, UOVS). Bloemfontein.
  15. VAN TONDER, SI E. (1981). Voorwoord. L C Steyn. Die uitleg van wette (5de uitg.).
How to Cite
’n Semiotiek van asiel/sitbetoging: : ’n interpretasie van die kine 3·gebeure. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 10(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v10i2.2011

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate