HIV/AIDS & gende: the inadequacy of liberalism’s response

the inadequacy of liberalism’s response

Pieter Fourie
University of Johannesburg
Share:

How to Cite

HIV/AIDS & gende: the inadequacy of liberalism’s response. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 22(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v22i2.1811
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 23, 2022
  • Published: October 24, 2022

Abstract

This paper addresses the unfortunate fact that social theory – particularly in the human
sciences – has been ominously reticent in its intellectual input on the social determinants
of HIV in South Africa. A brief overview is provided of the manifestations of HIV/AIDS
as a genderised† variable. This is followed by an application to this context of the basic
feminist theories – what the lessons are that these afford us when combined with the
societal effects of the disease. This is done within the context of South Africa (post1994) as a state with a liberal constitution. The paper points out that there are distinct
limits to how this particular ideology and its feminist variant are able provide a
transformative impetus in our society. It concludes by emphasising the need for social
theory in general and gender theory in particular to embrace ideological eclecticism in
an effort to combat the hugely negative consequences of HIV/AIDS.

References

  1. BUJRA, J. 2000. Targeting men for a change: AIDS discourse and activism in Africa. Agenda, 44. https://doi.org/10.2307/4066430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4066430
  2. GOTTEMOELLER, M. 2000. Empowering women to prevent HIV: The microbicide advocacy agenda.Agenda, 44. https://doi.org/10.2307/4066432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4066432
  3. KINGHORN, A. 1994. Property-grabbing: why Zambia needs stronger laws to protect women's rights. AIDS Analysis Africa, 4(4), July/August.
  4. LECLERC-MADLALA, S. 1996. Crime in an epidemic: The case of rape and AIDS'. Acta Criminologica, 9(2).
  5. LOVELIFE. 2000. Hot Prospects, cold facts. Johannesburg : Colorpress Ltd.
  6. MAMAN, S. et al. 2001. HIV and partner violence: Implications for HIV voluntary counselling and testing programs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. New York : The Population Council Inc. https://doi.org/10.31899/HIV2.1050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31899/HIV2.1050
  7. MBOI, N. 1996. Women and AIDS in South and South-East Asia: The challenge and the response. World Health Statistics Quarterly, 49(2).
  8. MATTHWES, S. 2000. Women in conflict. Conflict Trends, 4.
  9. MONEKOSSO, H. 1997. The female condom: What about its effectiveness, safety and acceptability? AIDS Analysis Africa, 8(3), October/November.
  10. NDIAYE, C. 2000. Women and AIDS in Africa: The experience of the society for women and AIDS in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220460009545313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220460009545313
  11. South African Journal of International Affairs, 7(2):59-66, Winter.
  12. O'SULLIVAN, S. 2000. Uniting across global boundaries - HIV-positive women in global perspective. Agenda, 44. https://doi.org/10.2307/4066431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4066431
  13. SHELL, R. & ZEITLIN, R. 2000. Positive outcomes: The chances of acquiring HIV/AIDS during the schoolgoing years in the Eastern Cape, 1990-2000. Population Research Unit paper presented at the South African Epidemiological Conference, 25 February, Paris.
  14. SHELL, R. 2000. Halfway to the holocaust: The economic, demographic and social implications of the AIDS pandemic to the year 2010 in the Southern African region. HIV/AIDS: A Threat to the African Renaissance?, Konrad Adenauer Stifting Occasional Paper, June.
  15. TALLIS, V. 2000. Gendering the response to HIV/AIDS challenging gender inequality. Agenda, 44. https://doi.org/10.2307/4066436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4066436
  16. VETTEN, L. & BHANA, K. 2001. Violence, vengeance and gender. A preliminary investigation into the links between violence against women and HIV/AIDS in South Africa. Johannesburg : Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.
How to Cite
HIV/AIDS & gende: the inadequacy of liberalism’s response. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 22(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v22i2.1811

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate