Implied information adds richness to ‘lean’ media

Share:

How to Cite

Implied information adds richness to ‘lean’ media. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 23(1), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v23i1.1788
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 22, 2022
  • Published: October 24, 2022

Abstract

E-mail has become an accepted means of communication in working environments, and
virtual teams who infrequently meet face to face tend to use e-mail extensively even
when they are involved in complex and sensitive discussions. This paper reports on an
analysis of the e-mails of university students working in virtual teams. It was found that
the timing of e-mail messages provides implied information and compensates to some
extent for the loss of non-verbal cues that are present in face-to-face communication.
This implied information contributes to the richness of the information and assists the
reader in interpreting not only the message but also the context. As a result, trust can
be established or undermined. Actual examples are provided to illustrate some of the
issues.

References

  1. ALEXANDER, P. M. 2002. Towards reconstructing meaning when text is communicated electronically. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Information Technology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
  2. CHESTER, A. & GWYNNE, G. 1998. Online teaching: Encouraging collaboration through anonymity, JCMC, 4(2).
  3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00096.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00096.x
  4. CHIDAMBARAM, L. & JONES, B. 1993. Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 17(4):465-488.
  5. https://doi.org/10.2307/249588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249588
  6. CHIDAMBARAM, L. 1996. Relational development in computer-supported groups, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20(2):143(23).
  7. https://doi.org/10.2307/249476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249476
  8. DAFT, R.L. & LENGEL, R.H. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, Management Science, 32(5):554-571.
  9. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  10. DAVENPORT, T.H. & MARKUS, M.L. 1999. Rigor vs. relevance revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(1):19(5).
  11. https://doi.org/10.2307/249405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249405
  12. DENNIS, A.R. & KINNEY, S.T. 1998. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality, Information Systems Research, 9(3):256-274.
  13. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256
  14. GIDDENS, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
  15. HABERMAS, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1) Reason and the rationalization of society, translated by T McCarthy. Boston : Beacon Press.
  16. HOLLAND, C.P. 1998. The importance of trust and business relationships in the formation of virtual organizations. (In Sieber, P. & Griese, J. eds. Organizational Virtualness Proceedings of the V O Net - Workshop, April, 1998. Bern : Simowa Verlag.)
  17. ISHAYA, T. & MACAULY, L. 1999. The role of trust in virtual teams. (In Sieber, P. & Griese, J. eds. Organizational virtualness and electronic commerce, Proceedings of the 2nd International VoNet - Workshop, September 23-24, 1999. Bern : Simowa Verlag.)
  18. JARVENPAA, S.L. & SHAW, T.R. 1998. Global virtual teams: Integrating models of trust. (In Sieber, P. & Griese, J. eds. Organizational virtualness proceedings of the V O Net - Workshop, April, 1998. Bern : Simowa Verlag.)
  19. JARVENPAA, S.L., KNOLL, K. & LEIDNER, D.E. 1998. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams, J of MIS, 14(4):29-64.
  20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185
  21. KLEIN, H.K. & MYERS, M.D. 1999. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in IS. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(1):67-93.
  22. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
  23. LEE, A.S. 2001. Challenges to qualitative researchers in information systems. (In Trauth, E. ed. Qualitative research in IS: Issues and trends. Hershey, PA : Idea Group Publishing.)
  24. LEE, A.S. 1999. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(1):25(3).
  25. https://doi.org/10.2307/249407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249407
  26. LEE, A.S. 1994. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 18(2):143-157.
  27. https://doi.org/10.2307/249762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249762
  28. MARKUS, M.L. & LEE, A.S. 2000a. Special issue on intensive research in information systems: Using qualitative, interpretive, and case methods to study information technology - second installment; foreword, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(1):1.
  29. MARKUS, M.L. & LEE, A.S. 2000b. Special issue on intensive research in information systems: Using qualitative, interpretive, and case methods to study information technology - third installment; foreword, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(3):473.
  30. MARKUS, M.L. 1994. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice, Organization Science, 5(4): 502-527.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.502
  32. NGWENYAMA, O.K. & LEE, A.S. 1997. Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical Social Theory and the contextuality of meaning, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(2):145-167.
  33. https://doi.org/10.2307/249417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249417
  34. RICE, R.E. 1992. Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness, Organization Science, 3(4):475-500.
  35. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.475
  36. ROMM, C.T. & PLISKIN, N. 1998. Electronic mail as coalition-building information technology, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(1):82-101.
  37. https://doi.org/10.1145/267954.267958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/267954.267958
  38. SABHERWAL, R. 1999. The role of trust in outsourced IS development, Communications of the ACM, 42(4):80.
  39. https://doi.org/10.1145/293411.293485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/293411.293485
  40. WEBSTER, J. & TRAVINO, L.K. 1995. Relational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies, Academy of Management J, 38(6): 1544-1573.
  41. https://doi.org/10.2307/256843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256843
  42. WALSHAM, G. 1995. Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method, European J of IS, 4: 74-81.
  43. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9
  44. YATES, J. & ORLIKOWSKI, W.J. 1992. Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media, Academy of Management Review, 17(2):299-326.
  45. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279545
How to Cite
Implied information adds richness to ‘lean’ media. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 23(1), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v23i1.1788

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate