Empirical support of the positive impact of an Intranet on communication in the working environment

Share:

How to Cite

Empirical support of the positive impact of an Intranet on communication in the working environment. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 24(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v24i1.1762
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 20, 2022
  • Published: October 24, 2022

Abstract

Organizations of all shapes and sizes have to embrace information technology to survive
and thrive in an increasingly competitive environment. Consequently, the level of
penetration and sophistication of information technology is growing rapidly, and with
it a concomitant increase in the level of organizational impact. In this article the authors
investigate the impact of an Intranet on organizational issues, such as communication.
The research study shows that technology like an Intranet, if used correctly, can have
a very positive impact on an organization’s communication culture and as such on various
other important organizational issues. The research was conducted in an insurance
company in South Africa (“The Insurance Company”).

References

  1. DU PLOOY, N.F. 1993. The social aspects of information systems. Working paper series. Department of Informatics. University of Pretoria. Pretoria
  2. DYER, G. 2000. Collaboration is the path to raging knowledge. Computerworld Custom Publishing, December 4, 2000.
  3. HERMES GROUP 2000. Accessing the impact of intranets on the business environment. Computerworld, September 14, 2000.
  4. GERSTNER, J. 1999. The promise of intranets: Expectations and Effectiveness. [Web:] http://www.iabc.com/events/intra.htm.
  5. GONZALEZ, J.S. 1998. The 21st-Century intranet. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  6. GROUPNET PRESENTATION. 2000. The Insurance Company.
  7. GUPTA, U & HEBERT, F. J. 1998. Is your company ready for an intranet? S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 63(4): 11- 19.
  8. KIRSNER, S. 1999. Intranet marketing 101. CIO Web Business Magazine, December 1999.
  9. LOZIER, K.R. & WARNER, P.D. 1997. The internet and intranet in the workplace. CPA Journal, 67(2):72-76.
  10. MURGOLO-POORE, M.E., PITT, L.F., EWING, M.T., AND BERTHON, P.R. 2001. The Intranet as an Internal
  11. Marketing Medium: Towards a Measure of Effectiveness Proceedings of Academy of Marketing 2001Annual Conference, ed. Strong, C., Academy of Marketing: University of Cardiff, July
  12. SHEPHARD, C. 1998a. Assessing your communication options. [Web:] http://www.fastracconsulting.co.uk
  13. SHEPHARD, C. 1998b. Assessing intranet cost-benefits. [Web:] http://www.fastrac-consulting.co.uk
  14. SHEPHARD, C. 1998c. Why training needs the intranet. [Web:] http://www.fastrac-consulting.co.uk
  15. STODDART, L. 2001. Managing intranets to encourage knowledge sharing: opportunities and
  16. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520110366661constraints. Online Information Review, 25(1): 19-29.
  17. STUART, A. 1997. Under the hood at Ford. Webmaster Magazine, June 1997.
  18. EN, D.C. & CHOU, D.C. 2001. Intranets for organizational innovation. Information Management &
  19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220110388845Computer Security, 9 (2): 80-87
How to Cite
Empirical support of the positive impact of an Intranet on communication in the working environment. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 24(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v24i1.1762

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate