Advance Search

Bridging the chasm between theory and research/practice in Communication Science: a challenge in higher education

a challenge in higher education

Gertruida du Plooy
University of South Africa
Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Share:

How to Cite

Bridging the chasm between theory and research/practice in Communication Science: a challenge in higher education. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 25(2), 62-84. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v25i2.1743
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 18, 2022
  • Published: October 20, 2022

Abstract

This article investigates the problems experienced by academics and higher education adult
learners when required to conduct research in real-life situations, namely to find a logical link or
bridge between theory and research methodology or practice. It is argued that a chasm is found
to exist, due to factors such as alienation between theory and research/practice, the role of
language, culture, and, the quest for objectivity. This is a reflective scrutiny addressing the utility
criterion of theory- building, dialectical and relativist thinking, plus dispositions and skills that adult
learners have to develop to promote creative and critical thinking. Thereafter, five generic dimensions
of metatheoretical perspectives are offered as a possible means of bridging this chasm. The article
concludes with specific recommendations, which future Communication curricula in higher education
should address in order to facilitate bridging the divide between theory and research/practice.

pdf
pdf

Article Metrics Graph

Article Views | PDF Downloads
Chart Graph | Range Graph

References

  1. Acourt, P. (1987). The unfortunate domination of social theories by 'Social Theory'. Theory, Culture & Society, 4(4):659-689.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327687004004006
  3. Adorno, T. (1973). The jargon of authenticity. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  4. Armstrong, G.B. & Bauman, I. (1993). A mathematical model for intercultural interactions: making connections and increasing harmony. Journal of Communication, 43(1):81-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01250.x
  5. Asmal, K. (2003). Higher education - public good? Achiever, 7:24-27.
  6. Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.
  7. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  8. Barnett, R. & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. London: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  9. Beckham, E.F. (Editor). (2002). Global collaborations: the role of higher education in diversedemocracies. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  10. Bellamy, R. (1987). Post-modernism and the end of history. Theory, Culture & Society, 4(4): 727-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327687004004008
  11. Boudon, R., Vaughan, M & MacRae, D. (1971). The uses of structuralism. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
  12. Chomsky, N. & Miller, G.A. (1963). Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages, in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. Edited by Luce, R.D. Bush R.R. & Galanter. E. New York: Wiley:269-321.
  13. Commons, M.L, Richards, F.A. & Kuhn, D. (1982). Systematic metasystematic, and cross paradigmatic reasoning: A case for stages of reasoning beyond Piaget's stage of formal operations. Child Development, 53:1058-1068. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129147
  14. De Beer, C.S. (1989). Between the Scylla and Charybdis of technical progress. RSA 2000, 11(2):38-51. Department of Education. (2001). National plan for higher education in South Africa. Pretoria.
  15. Ensor, P. (2004). Contesting discourses in higher education curriculum restructuring in South Africa. Higher Education, 48:339-359.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000035544.96309.f1
  17. Fitch, K.L. (2003). Cultural persuadables. Communication Theory, 13(1):100-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00284.x
  18. Gadamer, H. (1976). Truth and method. New York: Seabury.
  19. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and practice. Boston: Beacon Press.
  21. Hall, E.T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday
  22. Higgs, L.G. (1998). The democratisation of knowledge: a new paradigm for courses in Philosophy of Education at the University of South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education. Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Hoër Onderwys, 12(1):190-200.
  23. HigHowells, R. (2003). Visual culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  24. Keyton, J. (2006). Communication research. asking questions, findings answers. 2nd edition. NewYork, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  25. Krippendorff, K. (1984): An epistemological foundation for communication. Journal of Communication, 34(3):21-36.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02171.x
  27. Labouvie-Vief, G. (1982). Dynamic development and mature autonomy. Human Development, 25:161-191. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272795
  28. Le Grange, L. (2006). Curriculum: A neglected area in discourses in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 20(2):189-194.
  29. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v20i2.25566
  30. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1949). Les Structures élémentaires de la parent. Paris: Universitaires de France.
  31. Lustig, M.W. (1986). Theorizing about human communication. Communication Quarterly, 34: 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378609369662
  32. Marais, D. (1994). The need for the study of theory in public administration. Politeia, 13(1): 85-96.
  33. Mbeki, T. (1998). Africa. The time has come. Cape Town and Johannesburg: Tafelberg Publishers Ltd, and Mafube Publishing (Pty) Ltd.
  34. Mouton, J. (1998). Understanding social research. 2nd impression. Pretoria: J.L. van Schaik.
  35. Muller, J. (2005). The world is not enough: Knowledge in question. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19(3):497-511.
  36. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v19i3.25506
  37. Muller, M.E. (1994). Internasionale politieke metateorie: 'n 'nuwe' studiearea? Politeia, 13(1): 17-30.
  38. Phenix, P.H. (1964). Realms of meaning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
  40. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Hutchinson.b https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060577
  41. Popper, K. (1976). Unended quest. London: Fontana.
  42. Reinard, J.C. (2001). Introduction to communication research. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  43. Rybash, J.M., Hoyer, W.J. & Roodin, P.A. (1986). Adult cognition and aging. development changes in processing, knowing and thinking. New York: Pergamon Press.
  44. Smith, M.J. (1988). Contemporary communication research methods. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth. Spector, B.S. (1993). Order out of chaos: restructuring schooling to reflect society's paradigm shift. School Science and Mathematics, 93(1):9-19.
  45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1993.tb12183.x
  46. Van der Westhuizen, G.J. & Mahlomaholo, M.G. (2001). Historical legacies hold us captive - an analysis of curriculum changes at Vista University, South Africa. South African Journal of
  47. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v15i1.25382
  48. Higher Education, 15(1):68-76. 83 Vol her Education Quality Committee (HEQC). (2004). Criteria for programme accreditation. CHE:
  49. Van Niekerk, L.J. (1998). The role of current theories of education in distance education. In UNISA as distinctive university for our time; as eiesoortige universiteit vir ons tyd. Edited by de Beer, C.S. Pretoria: University of South Africa:103-115.
  50. Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Translated and edited by Shils, E.A. & Finch, H.A. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
  51. Weber, M. (1977). "Objectivity" in Social Science and Social Policy. In Understanding and Social Inquiry. Edited by Dallmayer, F.R. & McCarth, T.C. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press:24-37.
  52. Wiechers, M. (1998). Transformation: Implications for curriculum development, research and teaching. In UNISA as distinctive university for our time; as eiesoortige universiteit vir ons tyd. Edited by De Beer, C.S. Pretoria: University of South Africa:227-233.
How to Cite
Bridging the chasm between theory and research/practice in Communication Science: a challenge in higher education. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 25(2), 62-84. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v25i2.1743

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
    • Clarivate