An exploration of digital rhetoric in a social network environment

Share:

How to Cite

An exploration of digital rhetoric in a social network environment. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 32(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v32i1.1620
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 15, 2022
  • Published: October 17, 2022

Abstract

This article explores the use of digital rhetoric in a social network environment with a view to
obtaining greater insight into how traditional rhetoric may be applied. In this article, digital rhetoric
refers to persuasive communication in different electronic formats. The article focuses on an
inductive logos communication technique used in a popular microblogging site to promote the
2011 Rugby World Cup event held in New Zealand. Sport readily lends itself to the viral spread
of information by means of electronic word of mouth (eWOM) because it generates excitement
among sport enthusiasts. Big sporting events thus provide an ideal medium for marketers of sports
events to use different marketing communication tools to communicate persuasive messages
regarding sport to a large target audience. The findings of the study on which this article is based
shed more light on digital rhetoric and can also serve as a heuristic tool for other researchers
analysing sports-marketing communication messages in social network environments.

References

  1. Get persistent links for your reference list or bibliography.
  2. Copy and paste the list, we’ll match with our metadata and return the links.
  3. Members may also deposit reference lists here too.
  4. Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996
  5. Bonet, E. & Sauquet, A. (2010). Rhetoric in management and in management research. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(2):120-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811011031283
  6. Borges, B. (2009). Marketing 2.0. Bridging the gap between seller and buyer through social media marketing. Arizona, USA: Wheatmark.
  7. Boyd, D., Golder, S. & Lotan, G. (2010, January). Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. 43rd Conference Proceedings of the International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS'10 (pp.1-10). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
  8. Cavender, N. & Kahane, H. (2010). Logic and contemporary rhetoric: the use of reason in everyday life. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  9. Cetina, K.K. (2009). What is a pipe? Obama and the sociological imagination. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(5):129-140. DOI: 10.1177/0263276409106354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409106354
  10. Chalip, L., Green, B.C. & Hill, B. (2003). Effects of sport event media on destination image and intention to visit. Journal of Sport Management, 17:214-234. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.17.3.214
  11. Charton, D. (2007). Why social networking matters for SA marketers. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from http://www.marketingweb.co.za.
  12. Dhir, K.S. (2006). Corporate communication through nonviolent rhetoric: environmental, agency and methodological prerequisites. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3):249-266. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280610680830
  13. Dong-Hun, L. (2010). Attraction of sports marketing as means of communication, SERI Quarterly, July, 113-115.
  14. Drengner, J., Gaus, H. & Jahn, S. (2008). Does flow influence the brand image in event marketing? https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849908080148
  15. Journal of Advertising Research, March. DOI: 10.2501/S0021849908080148. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849908080148
  16. Durand, J. (2001). Game, set and message: the growing prominence of sport as a communication product, Communicare, 20(1):67-73
  17. Erickson, G.S. & Kushner, R.L. (1999). Public event networks: an application of marketing theory to sporting events, European Journal of Marketing, 33(3):348-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910253189
  18. Evans, D. (2008). Social media marketing: an hour a day. London: Wiley.
  19. Fox, R. (2006). Corporations' ideologies: a new subfield of study of corporate communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(4):353-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280610713842
  20. Funk, D.C. (2009). Consumer behaviour in sport and events marketing. Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080942858
  21. Galer-Unti, R. (2009). Guerilla advocacy: using aggressive marketing techniques for health policy change. Health Promotion Practice, 10:325-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839909334513
  22. Golden, M. (2011). Social media strategies for professionals and their firms. The guide to establishing credibility and accelerating relationships. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119200352
  23. Goodman, G.F. (2012). Engagement marketing: how small business wins in a socially connected world. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  24. Hoffman, M. & Ford, D.J. (2010). Organizational rhetoric: situations and strategies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  25. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452274928
  26. Honeycutt, C. & Herring, S. (2009, January). Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter. 42nd Conference Proceedings of the International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS'09, Hawaii (pp. 1-10).
  27. Huang, J. & Galliers, R.D. (2011). The importance of rhetoric in conceptualizing IS adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(3):219-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391111122826
  28. Huberman, B.A., Romero, D.M. & Wu, F. (2008). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0812/0812.1045v1.pdf.
  29. Hughes, A.L. & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2009.031564
  30. Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K. & Chowdury, K. (2009). Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11): 2169-2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21149
  31. Jasinski, J. (2001). Sourcebook on rhetoric. Key concepts in contemporary rhetorical studies. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  32. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233222
  33. Java, A., Song, X., Finn, T. & Teseng, B. (2007). Why we Twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proceedings of the Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop. https://doi.org/10.1145/1348549.1348556
  34. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/get/a/publication/369.pdf.
  35. Kelly Page, D.K. & Mapstone, M. (2010). How does the web make youth feel? Exploring the positive digital native rhetoric. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13-14):1345-1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.523709
  36. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P. & Arlitt, M. (2008). A few chirps about Twitter. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks, Seattle, WA (pp. 19-24). https://doi.org/10.1145/1397735.1397741
  37. Levinson, P. (2013). New New Media. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Lunsford, A.A., Wilson, K.A. & Eberly, A.R. (Eds). (2009). The SAGE handbook of rhetorical studies. London: SAGE.
  38. MacDonald, K.I., Van Duinkerken, J. & Stephens, J. (2008). It's all in the marketing: the impact of a virtual reference marketing campaign at Texas A&M University. Paper 30. University Library Faculty Publications. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/univ_lib_facpub/30.
  39. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press/Leonardo Books.
  40. Masterman, G. (2009). Strategic sport event management. Olympic Edition. 2nd ed. Burlington: Elsevier. McFedries, P. (2007). All a-twitter. IEE Spectrum, October:84.
  41. Parry, D. (2008). Twitter for academia. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://academhack.outsidethetext.com/home/2008/twitter-for-academia.
  42. Riemer K. & Richter, A. (2010, June). Tweet inside: microblogging in a corporate context. 23rd Bled eConference under the theme "eTrust: Implications for the Individual, Enterprises and Society", Bled, Slovenia.
  43. Rorty, A.M. (Ed.). (1996). Essays on Artistotle's rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California.
  44. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: SAGE.
  45. Ross, W.D. (2010). Rhetoric by Aristotle. New York: Cosimo. Rugby World Cup 2011. Retrieved April 21, 2010, from http://www.rugbyworldcup.com.
  46. Sahi, C.M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media. Management Decision, 50(2):253-272.
  47. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211203551
  48. Sanderson, J. (2011). It's a whole new ballgame: how social media is changing sports. New York: Hampton Press.
  49. Schwarz, E.C. & Hunter, J.D. (2008). Advanced theory and practice in sport marketing. Oxford: Elsevier.
  50. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8491-0.50010-0
  51. Scott, M. (2010). WordSmith tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  52. Skerlep, A. (2001). Re-evaluating the role of rhetoric in public relations theory and in strategies of corporate discourse. Journal of Communication Management, 6(2):176-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540210807026
  53. Smith, A.T.C. (2008). Introduction to sport marketing. Burlington: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8685-3.50004-2
  54. Warnick, B. (2005). Looking to the future: electronic texts and the deepening interface. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3):327-333.
  55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_11
  56. Weaver, K. (2011). Connecting fans and sports more intensively through social media. Cuttingedge Technologies, 2 (Higher Education Administration with Social Media):191-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000002013
  57. Young, J. (2008). Forget e-mail: new messaging service has students and professors a-twitter.
  58. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(25). Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://chronicle.com/free/v54/i25/25a01501.htm.
  59. Zappen, J.P. (2005). Digital rhetoric. Towards an integrated theory. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3):319-325.
  60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_10
How to Cite
An exploration of digital rhetoric in a social network environment. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 32(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v32i1.1620

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate