Arithmetic of the sound of silence: Adding, subtracting and taking back women’s voices in media spaces
Adding, subtracting and taking back women’s voices in media spaces

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Articles
- Submited: October 7, 2022
-
Published: October 7, 2022
Abstract
The web 2.0 has revolutionised the way in which we communicate with the effect that marginalised
groups, including women, can represent themselves – instead of being represented from
another’s perspective. However, this article argues that the blur of mainstream media and web
2.0 allows men to assume a superior status to women – especially in the global South. The thesis
of this article proffers a fresh insight that goes beyond the descriptions of how the web creates
contraflows of information for Southern women. At the heart of the debate is the impact garnered
– or rather lack of it – when user-generated content from the web 2.0 is used to counterbalance
issues from a mainstream point of reference. Using two independent Ugandan media houses as
case studies, the article explains data collected through participant observation and unstructured
interviews. The article finds that while Southern women have managed to use online spaces
(periphery) to acknowledge their sisterhood, an awareness of intersectionality in the mainstream
(centre) is conspicuously absent. It draws on the feminist communication theory as informed by
feminism and finds that men continue to be privileged when online (periphery) and offline (centre)
communities are blurred. To address this, women will have to robustly participate in the news
construction process at the “centre.”
Article Metrics Graph
References
- African Feminism (2016). Report on the 2016 Uganda Social Media conference. Available from: https://africanfeminism.com/2016/07/25/ugandan-women-caving-up-online-spaces-toimpact-national-discourse/
- Allan, S. (2006). Online news. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
- Archambault, J. (2011). Breaking up "because of the phone" and the transformative powers of information in southern Mozambique. New Media & Society, 13: 444-456.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810393906
- Beers, D. (2006). The public sphere and online independent journalism. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(1): 109-130.
- https://doi.org/10.2307/20054149
- Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. London and New York: Routledge.
- Bivens, R.K. (2008). The internet, mobile phones and blogging. Journalism Practice, 2(1): 113-129.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701768568
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Bruns, A. (2003). Gatewatching, not gatekeeping. Collaborative Online News Media International Australia, 107: 31-44.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0310700106
- Bulkeley, C.C. (2004). Whose news? Progress and status of women in newspapers (mostly) and television news. In R.R. Rush, C.E. Oukrop, & P.J. Creedon (eds.) Seeking equity for women in journalism and mass communication education: A 30-year update, 183-204. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Castells, M. (2004). Social movements against the new global order. In M. Castells (ed.) The power of identity, 154-158. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Chan, J.K. & Leung, L. (2005). Lifestyles, reliance on traditional news media and online news adoption. New Media & Society. 7(3): 357-382.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805052281
- Collins, P.H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment: Perspectives on gender, Vol. 2. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
- Craft, C. (1986). Too old, too ugly, not deferential to men. New York: St. Martin's.
- Dahlberg, L. (2007). Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: From consensus to contestation. New Media & Society, 9: 827-847. De Bruijn, M., Nyamnjoh, F., & Brinkman, I., (eds) 2009 Mobile Phones in Africa: The New Talking Drums in Everyday Life. Bamenda/Leiden: Langaa/ASC.
- Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms. Considering the consequences of different types of news media online. New Media & Society, 5(2): 203-230.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002004
- Qwerty Digital (2017). Digital statistics in South Africa. Available from: https://qwertydigital.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Digital-Statistics-in-South-Africa-2017-Report.pdf
- Gender Equality Index (2017). Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005-2015, main findings. Available from: https://eige.europa.eu/rdc/eige-publications/gender-equalityindex-2017-measuring-gender-equality-european-union-2005-2015-main-findings
- GlobalStats (2017). Statcounter figures on Uganda's social media landscape. Available from: http://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/uganda
- GMMP (2005). Global Media Monitoring Project. Available from: https://www.mediamonitoringafrica.org/images/uploads/gmmp-report-en-2005_small.pdf
- Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. (T. Burger, trans.). Boston: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962).
- Hauser, G.A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
- Herbert, J. & Thurman, N. (2007). Paid content strategies for news websites. Journalism Practice, 1(2): 208-226.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701275523
- Herman, E.S. & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.
- Hermida, A. (2010a). Twittering the news. Journalism Practice, 4(3): 297-308.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640703
- Hermida, A. (2010b). From TV to Twitter: How ambient news became ambient journalism. Media-Culture Journal, 13(2): n.p. Available from: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/ article/viewArticle/220
- https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.220
- Karppinen K., Moe H., & Svensson J. (2008). Habermas, Mouffe and political communication. Javnost - The Public, 15(3): 5-21.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2008.11008973
- Kelkar, G. (2007). Women in the digital era: Gender, culture and technology (Keynote address). International conference on women in the digital era organized by STPI and Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, TN, February 4-6, 2007. Available from: https://itforchange.net/sites/default/files/651/kelkar_mysore_workshop.pdf
- Lavie, A., & Lehman-Wilzig, S. (2005). The method is the message: Explaining inconsistent findings in gender and news research. Journalism, 6(1), 66-89.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905048953
- Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
- Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2003). New media: A critical introduction. Oxford: Routledge.
- Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
- May, T. & Mason, J. (eds.) (2003). Qualitative research in action. London: Sage.
- McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the internet. New York: Routledge.
- Mosco, V. (2005). The digital sublime: Myth, power, and cyberspace. London: MIT.
- https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2433.001.0001
- Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Vienna: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS).
- Nation Media Group (2018). Editorial policy guidelines and objectives. Available from: http://www.nationmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Editorial-policy-online.pdf
- Pavlik, J.V. (1999). New media and news: Implications for the future of journalism. New Media & Society, 1(1): 54-59.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444899001001009
- Robinson, S. (2007). Someone's gotta be in control here. Journalism Practice, 1(3): 305-321.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701504856
- Roizen, J., & Jepson, M. (1985). Degrees for Jobs: Employer expectations for higher education. Guildford: NFER-Nelson.
- Stakes, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
- Stenhouse, L. (1985). A note on case study and educational practice. In: R. Burgess (ed.) Field methods in the study of education. London: Falmer Press.
- Uganda Bureau of Statistics (2017). Statistical Abstract. Available from: http://www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/statistical_abstracts/2017_Statistical_Abstract.pdf
- Uganda Communications Commission (2017). Post, Broadcasting and Telecommunications Market & Industry Q3 Report. Available from: https://www.ucc.co.ug/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Market-Industry-Quarterly-Report-for-the-Quarter-ending-September-2017-Final.pdf
- US Global Development Lab (date??) report: Closing the Digital Gender Gap. Available from: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/closing_the_digital_gender_gap.pdf
- Wanyeki, L.M. (2002). The impact of (new) information and communication technologies (NICTS) on the media professions and media content with respect to gender. Paper presented at United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW) Expert Group Meeting on "Participation and access of women to the media, and the impact of media on, and its use as an instrument for the advancement and empowerment of women." Beirut, Lebanon. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/media2002/reports/EP10Wayneki.PDF
- Wasserman, E. (2006). Ethical journalism in the internet age. Available from: http://journalism.wlu.edu/knight/Lectures/05082006.htm
- Working Group on the Digital Gender Divide (2017). Report: Recommendations for action [on] bridging the gender gap in Internet and broadband access and use. Available from: https://broadbandcommission.org/Documents/publications/WorkingGroupDigitalGenderDividereport2017.pdf
- World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development (2017). Global Report 2017/18. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/world-media-trends-2017




