Arithmetic of the sound of silence: Adding, subtracting and taking back women’s voices in media spaces

Adding, subtracting and taking back women’s voices in media spaces

Share:

How to Cite

Arithmetic of the sound of silence: Adding, subtracting and taking back women’s voices in media spaces. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 38(2), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v38i2.1537
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 7, 2022
  • Published: October 7, 2022

Abstract

The web 2.0 has revolutionised the way in which we communicate with the effect that marginalised
groups, including women, can represent themselves – instead of being represented from
another’s perspective. However, this article argues that the blur of mainstream media and web
2.0 allows men to assume a superior status to women – especially in the global South. The thesis
of this article proffers a fresh insight that goes beyond the descriptions of how the web creates
contraflows of information for Southern women. At the heart of the debate is the impact garnered
– or rather lack of it – when user-generated content from the web 2.0 is used to counterbalance
issues from a mainstream point of reference. Using two independent Ugandan media houses as
case studies, the article explains data collected through participant observation and unstructured
interviews. The article finds that while Southern women have managed to use online spaces
(periphery) to acknowledge their sisterhood, an awareness of intersectionality in the mainstream
(centre) is conspicuously absent. It draws on the feminist communication theory as informed by
feminism and finds that men continue to be privileged when online (periphery) and offline (centre)
communities are blurred. To address this, women will have to robustly participate in the news
construction process at the “centre.”

References

  1. African Feminism (2016). Report on the 2016 Uganda Social Media conference. Available from: https://africanfeminism.com/2016/07/25/ugandan-women-caving-up-online-spaces-toimpact-national-discourse/
  2. Allan, S. (2006). Online news. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  3. Archambault, J. (2011). Breaking up "because of the phone" and the transformative powers of information in southern Mozambique. New Media & Society, 13: 444-456.
  4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810393906
  5. Beers, D. (2006). The public sphere and online independent journalism. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(1): 109-130.
  6. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054149
  7. Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. London and New York: Routledge.
  8. Bivens, R.K. (2008). The internet, mobile phones and blogging. Journalism Practice, 2(1): 113-129.
  9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701768568
  10. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  11. Bruns, A. (2003). Gatewatching, not gatekeeping. Collaborative Online News Media International Australia, 107: 31-44.
  12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0310700106
  13. Bulkeley, C.C. (2004). Whose news? Progress and status of women in newspapers (mostly) and television news. In R.R. Rush, C.E. Oukrop, & P.J. Creedon (eds.) Seeking equity for women in journalism and mass communication education: A 30-year update, 183-204. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  14. Castells, M. (2004). Social movements against the new global order. In M. Castells (ed.) The power of identity, 154-158. Oxford: Blackwell.
  15. Chan, J.K. & Leung, L. (2005). Lifestyles, reliance on traditional news media and online news adoption. New Media & Society. 7(3): 357-382.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805052281
  17. Collins, P.H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment: Perspectives on gender, Vol. 2. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  18. Craft, C. (1986). Too old, too ugly, not deferential to men. New York: St. Martin's.
  19. Dahlberg, L. (2007). Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: From consensus to contestation. New Media & Society, 9: 827-847. De Bruijn, M., Nyamnjoh, F., & Brinkman, I., (eds) 2009 Mobile Phones in Africa: The New Talking Drums in Everyday Life. Bamenda/Leiden: Langaa/ASC.
  20. Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms. Considering the consequences of different types of news media online. New Media & Society, 5(2): 203-230.
  21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002004
  22. Qwerty Digital (2017). Digital statistics in South Africa. Available from: https://qwertydigital.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Digital-Statistics-in-South-Africa-2017-Report.pdf
  23. Gender Equality Index (2017). Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005-2015, main findings. Available from: https://eige.europa.eu/rdc/eige-publications/gender-equalityindex-2017-measuring-gender-equality-european-union-2005-2015-main-findings
  24. GlobalStats (2017). Statcounter figures on Uganda's social media landscape. Available from: http://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/uganda
  25. GMMP (2005). Global Media Monitoring Project. Available from: https://www.mediamonitoringafrica.org/images/uploads/gmmp-report-en-2005_small.pdf
  26. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. (T. Burger, trans.). Boston: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962).
  27. Hauser, G.A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
  28. Herbert, J. & Thurman, N. (2007). Paid content strategies for news websites. Journalism Practice, 1(2): 208-226.
  29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701275523
  30. Herman, E.S. & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.
  31. Hermida, A. (2010a). Twittering the news. Journalism Practice, 4(3): 297-308.
  32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640703
  33. Hermida, A. (2010b). From TV to Twitter: How ambient news became ambient journalism. Media-Culture Journal, 13(2): n.p. Available from: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/ article/viewArticle/220
  34. https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.220
  35. Karppinen K., Moe H., & Svensson J. (2008). Habermas, Mouffe and political communication. Javnost - The Public, 15(3): 5-21.
  36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2008.11008973
  37. Kelkar, G. (2007). Women in the digital era: Gender, culture and technology (Keynote address). International conference on women in the digital era organized by STPI and Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, TN, February 4-6, 2007. Available from: https://itforchange.net/sites/default/files/651/kelkar_mysore_workshop.pdf
  38. Lavie, A., & Lehman-Wilzig, S. (2005). The method is the message: Explaining inconsistent findings in gender and news research. Journalism, 6(1), 66-89.
  39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905048953
  40. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
  41. Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2003). New media: A critical introduction. Oxford: Routledge.
  42. Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  43. May, T. & Mason, J. (eds.) (2003). Qualitative research in action. London: Sage.
  44. McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  45. Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the internet. New York: Routledge.
  46. Mosco, V. (2005). The digital sublime: Myth, power, and cyberspace. London: MIT.
  47. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2433.001.0001
  48. Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Vienna: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS).
  49. Nation Media Group (2018). Editorial policy guidelines and objectives. Available from: http://www.nationmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Editorial-policy-online.pdf
  50. Pavlik, J.V. (1999). New media and news: Implications for the future of journalism. New Media & Society, 1(1): 54-59.
  51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444899001001009
  52. Robinson, S. (2007). Someone's gotta be in control here. Journalism Practice, 1(3): 305-321.
  53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701504856
  54. Roizen, J., & Jepson, M. (1985). Degrees for Jobs: Employer expectations for higher education. Guildford: NFER-Nelson.
  55. Stakes, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
  56. Stenhouse, L. (1985). A note on case study and educational practice. In: R. Burgess (ed.) Field methods in the study of education. London: Falmer Press.
  57. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (2017). Statistical Abstract. Available from: http://www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/statistical_abstracts/2017_Statistical_Abstract.pdf
  58. Uganda Communications Commission (2017). Post, Broadcasting and Telecommunications Market & Industry Q3 Report. Available from: https://www.ucc.co.ug/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Market-Industry-Quarterly-Report-for-the-Quarter-ending-September-2017-Final.pdf
  59. US Global Development Lab (date??) report: Closing the Digital Gender Gap. Available from: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/closing_the_digital_gender_gap.pdf
  60. Wanyeki, L.M. (2002). The impact of (new) information and communication technologies (NICTS) on the media professions and media content with respect to gender. Paper presented at United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW) Expert Group Meeting on "Participation and access of women to the media, and the impact of media on, and its use as an instrument for the advancement and empowerment of women." Beirut, Lebanon. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/media2002/reports/EP10Wayneki.PDF
  61. Wasserman, E. (2006). Ethical journalism in the internet age. Available from: http://journalism.wlu.edu/knight/Lectures/05082006.htm
  62. Working Group on the Digital Gender Divide (2017). Report: Recommendations for action [on] bridging the gender gap in Internet and broadband access and use. Available from: https://broadbandcommission.org/Documents/publications/WorkingGroupDigitalGenderDividereport2017.pdf
  63. World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development (2017). Global Report 2017/18. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/world-media-trends-2017
How to Cite
Arithmetic of the sound of silence: Adding, subtracting and taking back women’s voices in media spaces. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 38(2), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v38i2.1537

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate