Advance Search

The gendered perspective of cyberbullying: The case of a rural University in Limpopo

Memory Mabika
University of Venda
Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2022 Memory Mabika

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Share:

How to Cite

The gendered perspective of cyberbullying: The case of a rural University in Limpopo. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 41(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i1.1399
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Articles
  • Submited: August 5, 2022
  • Published: August 5, 2022

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) has heightened misuse of internet-based technologies by young people. Besides increased integration due to availability and access to mobile communication technologies, students today indulge in cyberbullying where they harass, insult and stalk each other. Scholars have researched extensively on cyberbullying in institutions of higher learning globally and how victims try to cope with the problem. However, there is a dearth of literature on the gendered perspective of cyberbullying in institutions of higher learning in Southern Africa. Using the Social Information Processing Theory, the study examined the phenomenon of cyberbullying at a rural university in South Africa. The key questions of the study were: How do male and female victims perceive cyberbullying? How do male and female victims react to cyberbullying? Does cyberbullying have the same effects on students of different gender? Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and questionnaires targeted at male and female victims of cyberbullying at University of Venda. Findings revealed inconsistencies in how male and female victims perceived and reacted to cyberbullying.

PDF
PDF

Article Metrics Graph

Article Views | PDF Downloads
Chart Graph | Range Graph

References

  1. Arsenio, W.F. & Lemerise, E.A. (2004). Aggression and moral development: Integrating social information processing and moral domain models. Child Development, 75(4): 987-1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00720.x
  2. Bain, C.D. & Rice, M.L. (2006). The influence of gender on attitudes, perceptions, and uses of technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2): 119-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782476
  3. Barrett, L.F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P.R. & Eyssell, K.M. (1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition & Emotion, 12(4): 555-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379565
  4. Burton, P. & Mutongwizo, T. (2009). Inescapable violence: Cyber bullying and electronic violence against young people in South Africa. Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention, 8: 1-12.
  5. Chauke, L. (2020). The attitudes and opinions of young students towards their own language: The case of Tsonga-speaking students at the University of Johannesburg. International Journal of Language Studies, 14(2): 73-88.
  6. Coccaro, E.F. & Ridder, K.A. (2019). Social cognition in intermittent explosive disorder. In Intermittent Explosive Disorder : 145-156. Edited by Coccaro, E.F. & McCloskey, M.S. Oxford: Academic Press. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/social-information-processing-theory DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813858-8.00008-5
  7. Dawes, A., Bray, R., Kvalsvig, J., Kafaar, Z., Rama, S. & Richter, L. (2004). Going global with indicators of child well-being: Indicators of South African children's psychological development in the early childhood period. Report prepared for UNICEF by the Child,
  8. Youth, and Family Development Programme, Human Sciences Research Council.
  9. Available from: http://www.hsrc.ac.za/research/outputDocuments/2774_Dawea_Indicatorsofchildren.pdf
  10. Dodge, K.A. & Rabiner, D.L. (2004). Returning to roots: On social information processing and moral development. Child Development, 75(4): 1003-1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00721.x
  11. Etikan, I., Musa, S.A. & Alkassim, R.S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1): 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  12. Farhangpour, P., Maluleke, C. & Mutshaeni, H.N. (2019). Emotional and academic effects of cyberbullying on students in a rural high school in the Limpopo province, South Africa. South African Journal of Information Management, 21(1): 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.925
  13. Faucher, C., Jackson, M. & Cassidy, W. (2014). Cyberbullying among university students: Gendered experiences, impacts, and perspectives. Education Research International, 2014: 10 Article ID 698545 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/698545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/698545
  14. Forssell, R. (2016). Exploring cyberbullying and face-to-face bullying in working life– prevalence, targets and expressions. Computers in Human Behavior, 5: 454-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.003
  15. Goyal, M.S., Blazey, T.M., Su, Y., Couture, L.E., Durbin, T.J., Bateman, R.J., Benzinger, T.L.S., Morris, J.C., Raichle, M.E. & Vlassenko, A.G. (2019). Persistent metabolic youth in the aging female brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(8): 3251-3255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815917116
  16. Harris-Cik, T. & Steyn, F. (2018). THX 4 ITS? GNOC L8R? Gendered behaviour and opinions regarding sexting among secondary school learners. Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology. Special Edition: Cybercrime, 31(3): 34-56.
  17. Hennink, M.M., Kaiser, B.N. & Marconi, V.C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qualitative health research, 27(4): 591- 608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
  18. Hossen, M. (2020). Patriarchy Practice and Women’s Subordination in the Society of Bangladesh: An Analytical Review. Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2 (III), 51-60
  19. Jabulani, N. & Edward, L.M. (2021). The Whole-School Approach to Manage Cyberbullying: Lessons from South African Schools. Journal of Educational Studies, 20(1): 55-75.
  20. Jupp, V. (2006). The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020116
  21. Kotze, M. (2019). Is the difference in minimum legal ages of marriage for girls and boys in South Africa a violation of equality? Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria.
  22. Martin, F., Wang, C., Petty, T., Wang, W. & Wilkins, P. (2018). Middle school students’ social media use. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1): 213-224.
  23. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Palladino, B.E., Frisén, A., Berne, S., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Calmaestra, J., Scheithauer, H., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Luik, P. & Naruskov, K. (2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9): 455-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0040
  24. Messias, J., Vikatos, P. & Benevenuto, F. (2017). White, man, and highly followed: Gender and raceinequalities in Twitter. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI’17). Leipzig, Germany. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.08619.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106472
  25. Musharraf, S. & Anis-ul-Haque, M. (2018). Impact of cyber aggression and cyber victimization on mental health and well-being of Pakistani young adults: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 27(9): 942-958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1422838
  26. Myers, C.A. & Cowie, H. (2017). Bullying at university: The social and legal contexts of cyberbullying among university students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(8): 1172-1182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116684208
  27. Netshitangani, T. (2019). Voices of teachers on school violence and gender in South African urban public schools. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8: 21-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.03
  28. Ngidi, N.D. & Moletsane, R. (2018). Bullying in school toilets: Experiences of secondary school learners in a South African township. South African Journal of Education, 38 (Supplement 1): 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38ns1a1588
  29. Oishimaya, S.N. (2018). The richest and poorest provinces of South Africa. Available from: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-richest-and-poorest-provinces-of-south- africa.html
  30. Olaniran, B.A., Rodriguez, N. & Williams, I.M. Social Information Processing Theory (SIPT). International Interactions in Online Environments. In Computer-mediated communication across cultures: International interactions in online environments, IGI Global: 45–65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-833-0.CH004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-833-0.ch004
  31. Orel, A., Campbell, M., Wozencroft, K., Leong, E. & Kimpton, M. (2017). Exploring university students’ coping strategy intentions for cyberbullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(3): 446-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515586363
  32. Piotrowski, C. (2012). From workplace bullying to cyberbullying: The enigma of e-harassment in modern organizations. Organization Development Journal, 30(4): 44.
  33. Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., Munthali, A., Robson, E., Mashiri, M. & Tanle, A. (2012). Youth, mobility and mobile phones in Africa: Findings from a three-country study. Information Technology for Development, 18(2): 145-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.643210
  34. Raskauskas, J. & Huynh, A. (2015). The process of coping with cyberbullying: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23: 118-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.019
  35. Raskauskas, J. & Stoltz, A.D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(3): 564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564
  36. Ringrose, J. & Barajas, K.E. (2011). Gendered risks and opportunities? Exploring teen girls' digitized sexual identities in postfeminist media contexts. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 7(2): 121-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.7.2.121_1
  37. Roberts, J., Yaya, L. & Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(4): 254-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.3.2014.015
  38. Runions, K., Shapka, J.D., Dooley, J. & Modecki, K. (2013). Cyber-aggression and victimization and social information processing: Integrating the medium and the message. Psychology of Violence, 3(1): 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030511
  39. Sam, D.L., Bruce, D., Agyemang, C.B., Amponsah, B. & Arkorful, H. (2019). Cyberbullying victimization among high school and university students in Ghana. Deviant Behavior, 40(11): 1305-1321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2018.1493369
  40. Sleglova, V. & Cerna, A. (2011). Cyberbullying in adolescent victims: Perceptions and coping. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 5(2): 1-15.
  41. Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. and Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4): 376-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
  42. Soyemi, J., Oloruntoba, S.A. & Okafor, B. (2015). Analysis of mobile phone impact on student academic performance in tertiary institution. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 5(1): 361-365.
  43. Strom, P.S. & Strom, R.D. (2006). Cyberbullying by adolescents: A preliminary assessment. The Educational Forum, 70(1): 21-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984869
  44. Thomas, M. (Ed.). (2011). Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology, and the new literacies. New York: Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818848
  45. United Nations. (2017). With millions lacking food, education, shelter, targeted approaches needed to meet needs of most vulnerable, mandate‑holders tell Third Committee. Available from: https://www.un.org/press/en/2017/gashc4209.doc.htm
  46. Van Ouytsel, J., Lu, Y., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M. & Temple, J.R. (2019). Longitudinal associations between sexting, cyberbullying, and bullying among adolescents: Cross- lagged panel analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 73: 36-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.008
  47. Walther, J.B., Loh, T. & Granka, L., 2005. Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(1): 36-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04273036
  48. Whittaker, E. & Kowalski, R.M. (2015). Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence, 14(1): 11-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.949377
  49. Willard, N.E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. USA: Research press.
  50. Yahner, J., Dank, M., Zweig, J.M. & Lachman, P. (2015). The co-occurrence of physical and cyber dating violence and bullying among teens. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(7): 1079–1089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514540324
How to Cite
The gendered perspective of cyberbullying: The case of a rural University in Limpopo. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 41(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i1.1399

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
    • Clarivate