A Postcolonial and Material Theory of Knowledge for the Study of Religion A Comparison of Durkheim and Chidester’s Epistemologies
Main Article Content
Keywords
Epistemologies, comparison, social theory, postcolonial theory, material religion, Durkheim, Chidester
Abstract
This article addresses the fundamental question of how knowledge about reli-gion is acquired in the academic study of religion. It does so by means of a comparison of the answers to the question by Emile Durkheim and David Chidester. Durkheim, in engaging with the conventional distinction between rationalist and empiricist theories of knowledge of his time, as well as their combination by Kant, argues that categories of thought (such as space, time, causality, number, and classifications) are not mere abstract conditions of understanding, but are to be conceptualized as constructs of particular socie-ties. This social-anthropological shift in the theory of knowledge has been of decisive influence since the beginning of the 20th century, among others on the late 20th-century and beginning of the 21st-century South African scholar of religion, David Chidester. From a comparison of Durkheim’s epistemolo-gy with that of Chidester it is, however, clear that the latter brings new in-sights to the epistemological question by insisting on a postcolonial and ma-terial approach to the study of religion. The comparison of the two episte-mologies that I provide here should give substance to this point by comparing ways in which they deal with a selection of categories and concepts in their study of religion.
Article Metrics Graph
References
Chidester, D. 1987. Patterns of action: Religion and ethics in a comparative perspective. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Chidester, D. 2000. Material terms for the study of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 68, 2: 367-379. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jaarel/68.2.367
Chidester, D. 2005. Authentic fakes: Religion and American popular culture. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ 9780520938243
Chidester, D. 2012. Wild religion: Tracking the sacred in South Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ 9780520951570
Chidester, D. 2013. Postgraduates producing knowledge. Journal for the Study of Religion 26, 1: 5-7.
Chidester, D. 2018. Religion: Material dynamics. Oakland: University of California Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520297 654.001.0001
Durkheim, E. [1912] 1968. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: Le système totémique en Australie. 5th ed. Paris: Les Presses Universi-taires de France.
Durkheim, E. 1915. The elementary forms of the religious life. Swain, J.W. (trans.). London: G.A. Unwin. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000 446-191609000-00024
Durkheim, E. 1995. The elementary forms of religious life. Fields, K. (trans.). New York: Free Press.
Durkheim, E. [2001] 2008. The elementary forms of religious life. Abridged version. Cosman, C. (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199540129.001.0001
Jones, R.A. 1986. Emile Durkheim: An introduction to four major works. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lukes, S. 1972. Emile Durkheim: His life and works: A historical and critical study. New York: Harper & Row.
Smith, J.Z. 2004. Manna, mana everywhere and /È/È/. In Smith, J.Z. (ed.): Relating religion: Essays in the study of religion. Chicago: Universi-ty of Chicago Press.
Smith, J.Z. 2005. Introducing Durkheim. In Godlove, T. (ed.): Teaching Durkheim. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1093/0195165276.003.0001
Spencer, B. & F.J. Gillen 1899. Native tribes of central Australia. London: MacMillan. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2842887
Strijdom, J. & L. Scharnick-Udemans 2018. Materializing religion: Essays in honor of David Chidester. Journal for the Study of Religion 31, 2: 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3027/2018/v31n2a0
Strijdom, J.M. 2021. Animism: Comparing Durkheim and Chidester’s anal-yses of E.B. Tylor’s theory of religion. HTS Teologiese Stud-ies/Theological Studies 77, 2. a6717. 8 pages. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.4102/hts.v77i2.6717
Strijdom, J.M. 2023. Teaching about religion, peacebuilding and sustainable development in Africa. In Kilonzo, S., E. Chitando, & J. Tarusarira (eds.): The Palgrave handbook of religion, peacebuilding, and devel-opment in Africa. London: Palgrave MacMillan. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-031-36829-5_6
Strijdom, J.M. 2024. Comparison after materiality. In Tamimi Arab, P., J.S. Hughes, & S. Brent Plate (eds.): The Routledge handbook of material religion. London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/978135117 6231-8
Strijdom, J.M. (forthcoming). Totem: The ethics of a material term in the study of religion.
Taylor, M. (ed.) 1998. Critical terms for religious studies. Chicago: Universi-ty of Chicago Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/97802267 91739.001.0001
Tylor, E.B. [1871] 1977. Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art and custom. Vol. 1. New York: Gordon Press.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All work published is licensed under a Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY–NC–ND 4.0)
Journal for the Study of Religion is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of Open Access. Should any work or aspect thereof be referred to the author and journal should be duly referenced.
© Journal for the Study of Religion