Mapping Post-Secular Islamic Liberation Theology

Main Article Content

Ashraf Kunnummal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9769-2610

Keywords

Islamic liberation theology, post-secularism, Islam, Ali Shari`ati, Asghar Ali Engineer

Abstract

This article argues that the post-secular turn is the new social analysis that shapes the politics of the impoverized[1] in Islamic liberation theology. In this article, I suggest that, given the essentialism and determinism characterizing much of the contemporary studies of religion and secularism, a direct articulation of a post-secular approach from an Islamic liberation theology perspective is both inevitable and necessary. Such an approach can offer new meaning for both religion and secularism by engaging with the hegemony of secularism in relation to the state and society to envision a politics of the impoverized.


 


[1]    The article uses the term ‘impoverized’, although at a superficial glance it is merely the British English variant of ‘impoverished’, which usually denotes a temporary condition of being poor, usually caused by recent circumstances. The term is spelled with a ‘z’ not so much because it is the American version, but the pronunciation denotes that the poor are not merely a social category, but exists as a product of an economic system that systematically produces the condition of poverty. By using ‘impoverized’ rather than ‘the poor’ or the ‘impoverished’, the agency of that economic system is foregrounded to highlight a process of impoverization.

Abstract 201 | PDF Downloads 87

References

Abbasi, R. 2020. Did pre-modern Muslims distinguish the religious and sec-ular?: The Dīn-Dunyā binary in medieval Islamic thought. Journal of Islamic Studies 31, 2: 185-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etz048
Ahmad, I. 2017. Religion as critique: Islamic religious thinking from Mecca to market place. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. doi: https:// doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469635095.001.0001
Anjum, O. 2017. From the sacred canopy to the haunted vault: Understand-ing secularism from within Islam. American Journal of Islamic Social Science 34, 2: v-xxii. doi: https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v34i2.763
Arjana, S.R. 2018. The new Islamism: Remembrance and liberation. In Byrd, D. & M.S. Javad (eds.): Ali Shari`ati and the future of social theory: Religion, revolution and the role of the intellectual. Leiden: Brill.
Asad, T. 2003. Formation of the secular: Modernity, Islam, Christianity. New York: Stanford University Press.
Bayat, A. 1990. Shari’ati and Marx: A critique of an ‘Islamic’ critique of Marxism. Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics 10: 19-41. doi: https:// doi.org/10.2307/521715
Behrooz, M. 2000. Rebels with a cause: The failure of the left in Iran. Lon-don: I.B. Tauris. doi: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755612093
Bourdieu, P. 2001. Masculine domination. Nice, R. (trans.). Stanford: Stan-ford University Press.
Braidotti, R., B. Blaagaard, T. de Graauw, & E. Midden 2014. Transfor-mations of religion and the public sphere: Postsecular publics. Lon-don: Palgrave MacMillan. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401144
Brown, W. 2009. Introduction. In Asad, T., W. Brown, J. Butler, & S. Mah mood (eds.): Is critique secular? Blasphemy, injury and free speech. New York: University of California Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ california/9780982329412.003.0001
Brown, W. 2014. Is Marx (Capital) secular? Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Science 23, 1: 109-124. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.5250/quiparle.23.1.0109
Burgess, A. 2006. On drawing a line. In Shari`ati, A. (ed.): Religion vs. reli-gion. Bakhtiar, L. (trans.). Calicut: Other Books.
Byrd, D.J. 2018. Ali Shari`ati and critical theory: From black affirmation and red negation. In Byrd, D.J. & S.J. Miri (eds.): Ali Shari`ati and the fu-ture of social theory: Religion, revolution and the role of the intellec-tual. Leiden: Brill.
Cavanaugh, W.T. 2009. The myth of religious violence: Secular ideology and the roots of modern conflict. London: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385045.001.0001
Chatterjee, P. 1992. History and the nationalization of Hinduism. Social Re-search 59, 1: 111-149.
Eagleton, T. 2005. Holy terror. London: Oxford University Press.
Engineer, A.A. 1984. On developing theory of communal riots. Bombay: Institute of Islamic Studies.
Esack, F. 1997. Qur’an, liberation & pluralism. Oxford: Oneworld.
Fanon, F. 2018. Letter to Ali Shari`ati. In Fanon, F., J. Khalfa, & R.J.C. Young (eds.): Alienation and freedom. Corcoran, S. (trans.). New Delhi: Bloomsbury.
Fox, J. 2018. An introduction to religion and politics: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183787
Ghamari-Tabrizi, B. 2004. Contentious public religion: Two conceptions of Islam in revolutionary Iran: Ali Shari`ati and Abdolkarim Soroush. In-ternational Sociology 19, 4: 504-523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0268580904047371
Habermas, J. 2008. Between naturalism and religion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hashemi, M. 2017. Theism and atheism in a post-secular age. London: Pal-grave Macmillan. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54948-4
Jackson, S.A. 2017. The Islamic secular. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 34, 2: 1-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v34i2. 184
Khan, W. 2004. Islam and peace. New Delhi: Goodword Books.
Laclau, E. 2007. Discourse. In Goodin, R., P. Pettit, & T. Pogge (eds.): A companion to contemporary political philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leube, G. 2018. The liberties of a transmitter: Frantz Fanon according to Shari`ati. In Byrd, D.J. & S.J. Miri (eds.): Ali Shari`ati and the future of social theory: Religion, revolution and the role of the intellectual. Leiden: Brill.
Lloyd, W.D. 2016. Introduction: Managing race, managing religion. In Kahn, J.S. & W.D. Lloyd (eds.): Race and secularism in America. New York: Columbia University Press.
McLennan, G. 2010. The post-secular turn. Theory, Culture and Society 27, 4: 3-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410372239
Mitchell. J. 2016. Religion and the news: Stories, contexts, journalists and audiences. In Mitchell, J. & G. Owen (eds.): Religion and the news. London: Routledge.
Milton-Edwards, B. 2011. Islam and violence. In Murphy, A.R. (ed.): The Blackwell companion to religion and violence. London: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395747.ch14
Modood, T. 2014. Is there a crisis of ‘post-secularism’ in Western Europe?. In Braidotti, R., B. Blaagaard, T. de Bolette, & E. Midden (eds.): Transformations of religion and the public sphere: Post-secular pub-lics. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Nandy, A. 2007. Closing the debate on secularism: A personal statement. In Needham, A.D. & R.S. Rajan (eds.): The crisis of secularism in India. New Delhi: Permanent Black. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11 hpmw8.9
Nigam, A. 2006. The insurrection of little selves: The crisis of secular-nationalism in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195676068.001.0001
Nongbri, B. 2013. Before religion: History of a modern concept. London: Yale University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/97803001 54160.001.0001
Pandey, G. 1992. In defense of the fragment: Writing about Hindu-Muslim riots today. Imperial fantasies and postcolonial histories (Special Edi-tion) 37: 27-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2928653
Petrella, I. 2005. The future of liberation theology: An argument and mani-festo. Florence: Taylor & Francis.
Rahnema, A. 2000. An Islamic utopian: A political biography of Ali Sha-ri‘ati. New York: I.B. Tauris.
Roy, O. 2020. Is Europe Christian? Schoch, S. (trans.). London: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190099930.001. 0001
Saffari, S. 2017. Beyond Shariati: Modernity, cosmopolitanism, and Islam in Iranian political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayyid, S. 2014. Recalling the caliphate: Decolonization and world order. London: Hurst.
Scott, J.W. 2018. Sex and secularism. New York: Princeton University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888580
Sen, A. 2006. The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture and identity. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
Shari`ati, A. 2006. Religion vs. religion. Bakhtiar, L. (trans.). Calicut: Other Books.
Smith, A.M. 2012. Laclau and Mouffe: The radical democratic imaginary. London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203006719
Staudigl, M. & J.W. Alvis 2016. Phenomenology and the post-secular turn: Reconsidering the ‘return of the religious’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24, 5: 589-599.
Strensky, I. 2010. Why politics can’t be freed from religion. London: Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319156
Taylor, C. 2007. A secular age. London: Harvard University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044289
Thapar, R. 2016. Indian society and the secular. New Delhi: Three Essays Collective.
Upadhyay, S.P. & R. Robinson 2012. Revisiting communalism and funda-mentalism in India. Economic and Political Weekly 47, 36: 35-57.
Waine, A. & H. Kamali 2017. The architects of Islamic civilization. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies (IAIS).

Similar Articles

1-10 of 68

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.