EDUCATIONAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONS: A CASE OF FEDERAL UNIVERSITIES IN SOUTH EAST NIGERIA
Main Article Content
Keywords
Educational buildings, learning spaces, Nigeria, Performance Evaluation, Universities
Abstract
This paper assesses the level of awareness, perception and practice of Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) in the management of educational buildings. Hitherto performance evaluation of buildings has not received significant attention in Nigerian Universities. Universities procure buildings that neither respond to the demands of changing needs, nor fit for purpose. This study relies on current literature to explore how the constructs of BPE can be utilized to improve the design and management of educational buildings in the Nigerian university system. Data were generated using a convenient sample of construction professionals holding key positions in the physical planning and works departments of four Federal Universities in South East Nigeria. Data analyses were conducted using Excel and statistica; Version 9.0. The findings suggest that there appears to be an apparent lack of a systematic mechanism for measuring the success or performance of completed and occupied buildings in the universities. The absence of a performance evaluation database in the institutions explains this situation. The study reveals inadequate funding and lack of skilled personnel to conduct the performance evaluation of buildings. Consequently, the interaction between users and buildings did not add value to learning and working experiences. The paper concludes that a significant number of buildings in the case organisations were not fit for purpose. Furthermore, building performance indicators/measures identified as specific design objectives seem not have been explicitly expressed in most of the buildings investigated. The study emphasizes the need for designers and facilities managers to acquire skills on critical aspects of building performance evaluation as a means of meeting the increasing demand for higher quality in education. The exploratory nature of this research clarifies the problems that need to be addressed in future studies and so raised a number of theoretical and conceptual issues that must be explored in the performance evaluation of educational buildings.
Article Metrics Graph
References
Alexander, K. (2002). Facilities Management in Business: The ultimate resource. London: Bloomsbury publishing plc
Amaratunga, D and Baldry, D. (2000).Assessment of Facilities Management Performance. Facilities, 18 (7/8); 293 301.
Heitor, T. (2005).International Design Principles for Schools: Potential Problems and Challenges. OECD Programme on Educational Buildings. [Online].Available from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/45/35469220df. [Accessed 20 March 2010]
ISO 6241. (1984). Performance Standards in Building: Principles for their Preparation and Factors to be Considered. [Online]. Available from: www.techstreet.com/standards/iso/6241. [Accessed 10 September 2010].
Mutlaq, M.A. (2002). A Study of the Relationship between School Building Conditions and Academic Achievement of Twelfth Grade Students in Kuwaiti Public High Schools.Unpublished PhD thesis. America: The Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Obiegbu, M. E. (2005). Overview of Total Performance Concept of Buildings: Focusing on Quality, Safety, and Durability. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Conference of the Nigerian Institute of Building held in Abeokuta. April 27--28. pp. 2--10.
Organization for Economic Co--operation and Development (OECD) (2003). Review of Building Quality Using Post--Occupancy Evaluation.The PEB Exchange Journal of the OECD Programme on Educational Building.1 (48); 15--18.
Okolie, K. C. (2006). Design, Buildability and Quality Control Variables in Total Performance of Buildings. Multidisciplinary Journal of Empirical Research. 3 (3); 43--42.
Okorie, P.U. (2009). An Assessment of Accreditation Programmes of Nigerian Universities. Paper Presented at the Oxford Business and Economic Conference Programme held at St. Hugh’s College Oxford: Oxford University. 24--26 June. Pp. 5--19.
Preiser, W. F. (2002). Continuous Quality Improvement through Post--Occupancy Evaluation Feedback.Journal of Corporate Real Estate.5 (1); 37--40.
Robinson, L. and Robinson, T. (2009).An Australian Approach to School Design.CELE Exchange 2009/3.ISSN 2072--7925.
Sanoff, H. (2003). School Building Assessment Methods. Washington: National Clearinghouse for Educational Spaces.
Then, D. S. and Tan, T (2002).Measuring Operational Building Asset Performance: Concepts and Implementation. In: Ang, I; Prins, I and Tol, S. (Eds). Proceedings of CIB W60/W96 Hong Kong: Joint Conference on Performance Concept in Building and Architectural Management. pp. 381--395.
Then, D.S. (2004).Concepts in Facilities Management. In: Murray, M. and Langford, D. (Eds). Architects Handbook of Construction Project Management. London: RIBA Enterprises Ltd.
Watson, C and Thompson, K. (2005). Bringing Post--Occupancy Evaluation to Schools in Scotland.[Online].Available from www.oecd.org/dataoecd [Accessed 20 August 2010].
Article Sidebar
Article Details
The Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation (JCPMI) is committed to the principles of Open Access publishing and upholds the ethos of freely disseminating research findings to enhance knowledge and understanding within the field of construction project management and innovation.
In accordance with our commitment to open scholarly communication, all articles published by JCPMI are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). This licensing agreement allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the original author and source are credited. The license also ensures that authors retain copyright over their work while allowing the wider community to access, use, and build upon the content.
The terms of the CC BY-NC license are designed to facilitate the following:
- Attribution: Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. This can be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the user or their use.
- Non-Commercial: Users may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No Additional Restrictions: Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
By publishing with JCPMI, authors agree to these terms and ensure that their work is accessible and reusable under the conditions of the CC BY-NC license, thereby contributing to the ongoing exchange of knowledge and information in an Open Access environment.
Creative Commons CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License