Teach, Reflect, Grow: Empowering Aspiring Educators through Structured Observations
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0683-7234
Abstract
Doctoral training is increasingly accepted as creating the conditions for the development of mature researchers equipped with essential transferable skills such as the ability to design and deliver good teaching, especially for those envisioning a career in academia. While doctoral candidates are primarily focused on research, there is a pressing need for them to develop pedagogical competencies and professional skills essential for independent leadership. However, the scarcity of Continuous Professional Development (CPD) opportunities in teaching poses a significant challenge. This article explores the development and implementation of a structured teaching observation process within a foundational course for a "Certificate of Teaching in Higher Education" specifically aimed at PhD students. This process is designed to support the professional development of aspiring educators through a comprehensive, three-step observation framework involving pre-observation discussion, observation, and post-observation reflection. Our holistic reflections highlighted that, while resource-intensive, the process was instrumental in fostering learning; preparation and planning was highlighted as crucial for effective teaching; engagement and confidence varied widely among students; the process cultivated a teacher identity; creativity was emphasized, though constrained in some cases by existing course structures or students’ personalities; reflection helped in developing metacognitive skills; and feedback fostered improvement while also highlighting the tension between peer and instructor perspectives. The integration of feedback from both professional pedagogic experts and peer PhD students enriches the learning experience, promoting reflective practice and continuous improvement of teaching skills. This dual observation process offers diverse perspectives, fostering a culture of constructive feedback and professional growth.
References
Andrew, L., Wallace, R. and Sambell, R. (2021) ‘A peer-observation initiative to enhance student engagement in the synchronous virtual classroom: A case study of a COVID-19 mandated move to online learning,’ Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(4). Article 14. 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.14
Bell, M. and Cooper, P. (2013) ‘Peer observation of teaching in university departments: A framework for implementation,’ International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), pp. 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.633753
Benson, S.N.K. and Ward, C.L. (2013) ‘Teaching with technology: Using TPACK to understand teaching expertise in online higher
education,’ Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), pp. 153-172. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.c
Benton, S.L. and Young, S. (2018) ‘Best practices in the evaluation of teaching,’ IDEA Papers, 69, pp. 1-18.
Biggs, J., Tang, C. and Kennedy, G. eds. (2022) Teaching for quality learning at university. 5th ed. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Boyer, E. ed. (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Boysen, G.A.. Richmond, A.S. and Gurung, R.A.R. (2015) ‘Model teaching criteria for psychology: Initial documentation of teachers’ self-reported competency,’ Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), pp. 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000023
Brahm, N. (2023) Expanding Boyer’s model to better recognize diverse faculty roles. Insight into Academia. 14 May 2023. Available at: https://www.insightintodiversity.com/expanding-boyers-model/. (Accessed 11 January 2025).
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology,’ Qualitative Research Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cairns, A.M., Bissell, V. and Bovill, C. (2013) ‘Evaluation of a pilot peer observation of teaching scheme for chair-side tutors at Glasgow University Dental School,’ British Dental Journal, 214(11), pp. 573-576. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.527
Carroll, C. and O’Loughlin, D. (2014) ‘Peer observation of teaching: Enhancing academic engagement for new participants,’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), pp. 446-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.778067
Cassuto, L. (2022) Why teaching still gets no respect in doctoral training. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 10 March 2022. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/why-teaching-still-gets-no-respect-in-doctoral-training. (Accessed 29 October 2024).
Cutroni, L. and Paladino, A. (2023) ‘Peer-ing in: A systematic review and framework of peer review of teaching in higher education,’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 133. 104302. 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104302
Davis, T.S. (2011) ‘Peer observation: A faculty initiative,’ Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 3(2), pp. 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2011.01.009
Drew, S. and Klopper, C. (2014) ‘Evaluating faculty pedagogic practices to inform strategic academic professional development: A case of cases,’ Higher Education, 67(3), pp. 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9657-1
Durham, M.F., Knight, J.K., Bremers, E.K., DeFreece, J.D., Paine, A.R. and Couch, B.A. (2018) ‘Student instructor and observer agreement regarding frequencies of scientific teaching practices using the measurement instrument for scientific teaching-observable (MISTO),’ International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0128-1
Georgiou, H., Sharma, M. and Ling, A. (2018) ‘Peer review of teaching: What features matter? A case study within STEM faculties,’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(2), pp. 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1342557
Gibbons, R.E., Sachel, M., Villafane, M., Stains, K.L., Murphy, K.L. and Raker, J.R. (2018) ‘Beliefs about learning and enacted instructional practices: An investigation in postsecondary chemistry education,’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(8), pp. 1111-1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21444
Gurney, P. (2007) ‘Five factors for effective teaching,’ New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 4(2), pp. 89-98. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v4i2.480
Hendry, G.D. and Oliver, G.R. (2012) ‘Seeing is believing: The benefits of peer observation,’ Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 9(1). 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.9.1.7
Hyde, A., Clarke, M. and Drennan, J. (2011) The changing role of academics and the rise of managerialism. In Kehm, B. and Teichler, U. eds. The academic profession in Europe – new tasks and new challenges. Vol. 5, Cham: Springer, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4614-5_4
IUA (Irish Universities Association). (2021) Irish Universities doctoral skills statement. 3rd ed. Dublin: IUA.
Jones, M.H. and Gallen, A.M. (2016) ‘Peer observation feedback and reflection for development of practice in synchronous online teaching,’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), pp. 616-626. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1025808
Kehm, B.M. (2006) ‘Doctoral education in Europe and North America: A comparative analysis,’ Wenner Gren International Series, 83, pp. 67-78.
King, H. (2004) ‘Continuing professional development in higher education: What do academics do?’ Planet, 13(1), pp. 26-29. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2004.00130026
Koskinen, H.I. and Koskinen, M. (2022) ‘Short pedagogical training in supporting university teachers’ professional vision and (mis)conceptions concerning teaching and learning,’ International Journal for Academic Development, 27(4), pp. 425-438.
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). (2020) Recognizing and evaluating science teaching in higher education. In Debad, S.J. ed. Proceedings of Workshop #8212 – in brief. The National Academies Press. Available at: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25685/recognizing-and-evaluating-science-teaching-in-higher-education-proceedings-of. (Accessed 23 December 2024).
Nguyen, P.V. & Pham, H.T. (2020) ‘Academics’ perceptions of challenges of a peer observation of teaching pilot in a Confucian nation: The Vietnamese experience,’ International Journal for Academic Development, 26(4), pp. 448-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1827260
Novák, J. (2023) ‘Evaluation of student feedback as a tool for higher education quality enhancement,’ R&E-SOURCE 10, 1, pp. 117-127. https://doi.org/10.53349/resource.2023.is1.a1196
Nulty, D. (2001) Evaluation of educational programs: Issues for an effective policy framework. Paper presented at the Teaching Evaluation Forum – Student Feedback on Teaching: Reflections and Projections. Perth, Australia.
O’Keeffe, M., Crehan, M., Munro, M., Logan, A., Farrell, A.M., Clarke, E., Flood, M., Ward, M., Andreeva, T., Van Egeraat, C., Heaney, F., Curran, D. and Clinton, E. (2021) ‘Exploring the role of peer observation of teaching in facilitating cross-institutional professional conversations about teaching and learning,’ International Journal for Academic Development, 26(3), pp. 266-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1954524
Oliveira, T., Nada, C. and Magalhães, A. (2025) ‘Navigating an academic career in marketized universities: Mapping the international literature,’ Review of Educational Research, 95(2), pp.255-292. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231226336
Palmer, P.J. (2017) The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. 20th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylanne, S. and Nevgi, A. (2007) ‘The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education,’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), pp. 557-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.013
Reinholz, D.L. (2017) ‘Not-so-critical friends: Graduate student instructors and peer feedback,’ International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2). 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110210
Richard, C.L., Lillie, E., Mathias, K. and McFarlane, T. (2019) ‘Impact and attitudes about peer review of teaching in a Canadian pharmacy school,’ American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(6), pp. 1290-1299. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6828
Richmond, A.S., Boysen, G.A., Gurung, R.A.R., Tazeau, Y.N., Meyers, S.A. and Sciutto, M.J. (2014) ‘Aspirational model teaching criteria for psychology,’ Teaching of Psychology, 41(4), pp. 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314549699
Rifkin, B., Natow, R.S., Salter, N.P. and Shorter, S. (2023) Why doctoral programs should require courses on pedagogy: The case for paying far more attention to developing teaching skills in graduate school. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 16 March 2023. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/why-
doctoral-programs-should-require-courses-on-pedagogy?sra=true. (Accessed 29 October 2024).
Robinson, T.E. and Hope, W.C. (2013) ‘Teaching in higher education: Is there a need for training in pedagogy in graduate degree programs?’ Research in Higher Education, 21, pp. 1-11.
Saldaña, J. (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Smith, R.C., Kim, S. and McIntyre, L. (2016) ‘Relationships between prospective middle grades mathematics teachers’ beliefs and TPACK,’ Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), pp. 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1189624
Stoilescu, D. (2015) ‘A critical examination of the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework: Secondary school mathematics teachers integrating technology,’ Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), pp. 514-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115572285
Stupnisky, R.H., BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B. and Guay, F. (2018) ‘Faculty members’ motivation for teaching and best practices: Testing a model based on self-determination theory across institution types,’ Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, pp. 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.004
Teoh, S.L., Ming, L.C. and Khan, T.M. (2016) Faculty perceived barriers and attitudes toward peer review of classroom teaching in higher education settings: A meta-synthesis. Sage Open, 6(3), pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016658085
Wass, R. and Rogers, T. (2021) ‘Using video-reflection and peer mentoring to enhance tutors’ teaching,’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(1), pp. 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1695646
Whipp, P.R. and Pengelley, R. (2017) ‘Confidence building through peer observation of teaching and peer coaching in university departments: A good investment for some and not others,’ International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 6(2), pp. 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2016-0059
Yiend, J., Weller, S. and Kinchin, I. (2014) ‘Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and
developmental models of practice,’ Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), pp. 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.726967
Zimmerman, J. (2020). The amateur hour: A history of college teaching in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.77834
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.