Leveraging BRICS: South Africa's Pursuit of Soft Power and Cultural Diplomacy Frameworks in a Multipolar World

Main Article Content

Thelela Ngcetane-Vika University of the Witwatersrand image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2932-0169
Fumene George Tsibani University of Johannesburg image/svg+xml

Keywords

Cultural Diplomacy, Soft Power, BRICS, South Africa, Multipolarity, Ubuntu, Global Governance

Abstract

In the realm of soft power, South Africa, a mixed economy and post-apartheid democratic country, has emerged as a significant influencer in post-colonial Africa, particularly in the post-apartheid era. This elevated status presents a dual opportunity. On one hand, South Africa can use its position as a gateway to the African continent, capitalising on its reputation as a one-stop shop for investment and diplomacy. On the other hand, this very same status often leads to South Africa being perceived as a conduit to Africa’s vast, untapped resources, a perception that warrants careful consideration in the context of sustainable development and equitable partnerships. As the dynamics of global politics continue to evolve, it is crucial to acknowledge the complexities inherent in South Africa’s position and the implications thereof for the African continent and BRICS. The notion surrounding BRICS remains a contentious issue, sparking intense debate. It is noteworthy that numerous countries from the Global North and Global South leverage South Africa’s infrastructure to tap into the vast potential of African states. South Africa’s unique position, boasting a comprehensive array of embassies, cements its status as a continental hub - a distinction that Ethiopia, the only African nation never to have been colonised, cannot claim despite its rich history. Accordingly, this study examines South Africa’s strategic use of soft power and cultural diplomacy within the BRICS alliance, analysing its unique role as the bloc’s sole African representative. Grounded in Joseph Nye’s theory of soft power, the research employs a qualitative methodology using secondary data, document analysis, and case studies to assess how South Africa leverages its post-apartheid identity, cultural assets, and diplomatic networks to enhance its global influence. The findings reveal a significant soft power paradox: while South Africa possesses substantial assets, including its democratic transition, Ubuntu philosophy, and gateway position in Africa, its influence is critically undermined by domestic challenges such as xenophobia and economic inequality, which create a credibility gap. The study concludes that for South Africa to convert its symbolic representation into substantive leadership within BRICS, it must institutionalise its cultural diplomacy, proactively forge a cohesive African caucus within the enlarged bloc, and decisively address its internal contradictions. 

Abstract | PDF Downloads

References

Adams, M. (2023). BRICS and the new world order: Implications for the existing world order. Journal of Global Affairs, *15*(2), 45-62.

Adélé, J. (2023). Development financing in emerging economies: The role of BRICS institutions. Oxford University Press.

Adom, D., Joe, A.-A., & Hussein, E. K. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research, *7*(3), 438-441.

Afrobarometer. (2022). Dispatch No. 553: Xenophobia widespread in Africa, fuelled by perception of immigrants as a burden on the economy. Afrobarometer.

Agbai, E., Agbai, E., & Oko-Jaja, E. (2014). Bridging culture, nurturing diversity: Cultural exchange and its impact on global understanding. Research Journal of Humanities & Cultural Studies, *10*(2), 42-58.

Amsden, A. H. (2001). The rise of “the rest”: Challenges to the West from late-industrialising economies. Oxford University Press.

Ang, I., Isar, Y. R., & Mar, P. (2015). Cultural diplomacy: Beyond the national interest? International Journal of Cultural Policy, *21*(4), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1042474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1042474

Anholt, S. (2007). The new brand management for nations, cities, and regions. In Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities, and regions (pp. 1-25). Palgrave Macmillan.

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.

BBC. (2024, February 1). Brics: What is the group, and which countries have joined? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-66525474

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, *9*(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Briggs, I. (2021). Analysis of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA): The pros and cons. Journal of International Relations, Security and Economic Studies, *1*(1), 23-45.

Buser, A. (2021). Emerging powers and the international order: Outline. In Emerging Powers, global justice, and international economic law (pp. 15-32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63639-5_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63639-5

Carmody, P. (2019). South Africa in the global political economy: The BRICS connection: Contemporary changes and new directions. In The geography of South Africa (pp. 223-227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94974-1_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94974-1_24

Chaponda, M., Authority, M., Ndonga, D., & Laryea, E. (2020). Assessing the potential impact of the African Continental Free Trade Area on least developed countries: A case study of Malawi. Journal of Southern African Studies, *46*(4), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2020.1767888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2020.1767888

Cocks, M., Vetter, S., & Wiersum, K. (2017). From universal to local: Perspectives on cultural landscape heritage in South Africa. International Journal of Heritage Studies, *24*(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1362573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1362573

Constantinou, C., & Sharp, P. (2016). Theoretical perspectives in diplomacy. In The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy (pp. 13-27). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957930.n2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957930.n2

Costa, K. (2020). Making sense of theoretical and conceptual frameworks: A C.O.S.T.A. research coaching tool. Centre for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31730/osf.io/3fkz7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31730/osf.io/3fkz7

Cull, N. J. (2009). Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. Figueroa Press.

De Martino, M. (2020). Soft power: Theoretical framework and political foundations. Przegląd Europejski, *2*(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.31338/1641-2478pe.4.20.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/1641-2478pe.4.20.1

Diko, N., & Sempijja, N. (2020). Does participation in BRICS foster south-south cooperation? Brazil, South Africa, and the global south. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, *38*(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2020.1837746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2020.1837746

Duggan, N., Hooijmaaijers, B., Rewizorski, M., & Arapova, E. (2022). Introduction: ‘The BRICS, global governance, and challenges for South–South cooperation in a post-Western world’. International Political Science Review, *43*(4), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121211052211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121211052211

Gallarotti, G. (2011). Soft power: What it is, why it’s important, and the conditions for its effective use. Journal of Political Power, *4*(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886

Gallarotti, G. (2017). Le paradoxe pragmatique: Les BRICS comme vecteur de la diplomatie d’influence: A pragmatic paradox: The BRICS countries as vehicles for soft power diplomacy. Hermès, La Revue, *79*(2), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.3917/herm.079.0183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/herm.079.0183

Garvey, C. M., & Jones, R. (2021). Is there a place for theoretical frameworks in qualitative research? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, *20*, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987959

Georghiou, C. A. (2015). Cultural diplomacy: Should South Africa give it a try? South African Journal of International Affairs, *22*(4), 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2015.1126197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2015.1126197

Grincheva, N. (2023). The past and future of cultural diplomacy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, *30*(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.54985/peeref.2306p7310720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54985/peeref.2306p7310720

Hameiri, S., & Lee, J. (2012). The politics of international capacity building. Routledge.

Hendricks, C., & Majozi, N. (2021). South Africa’s international relations: A new dawn? Journal of Asian and African Studies, *56*(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620946851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620946851

Hieu, V. M., & Hai, N. T. (2022). The role of environmental, social, and governance responsibilities and economic development on achieving the SDGs: Evidence from BRICS countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, *36*(1), 1338-1360. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2086598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2086598

Hooijmaaijers, B. (2021). The BRICS countries’ bilateral economic relations, 2009 to 2019: Between rhetoric and reality. Sage Open, *11*(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054128

Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilisations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.

Hunter, A. (2009). Soft power: China on the global stage. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, *2*(3), 373-398. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop001

International Monetary Fund. (2023). Direction of trade statistics. IMF.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign Affairs, *77*(5), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/20049052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20049052

Khoza, R. (2005). Let Africa lead: African transformational leadership for 21st century business. Vezubuntu Publishing.

Khoza, R. (2025). African leadership in the global arena: Challenges and opportunities. University of Pretoria Press.

Kivunja, C. (2018). Distinguishing between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework: A systematic review of lessons from the field. International Journal of Higher Education, *7*(6), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p44

Kuhlmann, K., Akinyi, A., & Agutu, L. (2020). The African Continental Free Trade Area: Toward a new legal model for trade and development forthcoming. Georgetown Journal of International Law, *51*(4), 105-134. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3599438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3599438

Kundu, P. (2014). BRICS: Prospects and challenges. International Studies, *51*(1-4), 93-108.

Li, E. (2018). The rise and fall of soft power: Joseph Nye’s concept lost relevance, but China could bring it back. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/15/the-rise-and-fall-of-soft-power-joseph-nyes-concept-lost-relevance-but-china-could-bring-it-back/

Mark, S. L. (2009). A greater role for cultural diplomacy. Institute for Cultural Diplomacy, *6*, 1-12.

Mazenda, A., & Masiya, T. (2021). The New Development Bank and its role in South Africa’s infrastructure development. Development Southern Africa, *38*(4), 645-660.

McVeigh, B. (2010). Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States [Review of the book Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States, by Y. Watanabe & D. L. McConnell]. The Journal of Japanese Studies, *36*(2), 379-383. https://doi.org/10.1353/jjs.0.0166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jjs.0.0166

Menegazzi, S. (2020). Rising powers and the reform of global economic governance: The BRICS and the normative challenge ahead. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, *13*(1), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-019-00258-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-019-00258-2

Morozov, V. (2023). Theoretical analysis and implications of the network diplomacy concept. In Network Diplomacy (pp. 45-67). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7006-1_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7006-1_2

Mulibana, L., & Tshikovhi, N. (2024). Rural entrepreneurship and innovation in BRICS economies: Secondary evidence from rural areas in South Africa. Sustainability, *16*(6), 2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062408

Neethling, T. (2017). South Africa’s foreign policy and the BRICS formation: Reflections on the quest for the ‘right’ economic-diplomatic strategy. Insight on Africa, *9*(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087816674580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087816674580

New Development Bank. (2023). Project portfolio report. NDB.

Nye, J. S. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2151022

Nye, J. S. (2002). The paradox of American power: Why the world’s only superpower can’t go it alone. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195161106.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195161106.001.0001

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.

Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, *616*(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699

Nye, J. S. (2017). Soft power: The origins and political progress of a concept. Palgrave Communications, *3*(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.8

Ogharanduku, V., & Tinuoye, A. (2020). Impacts of culture and cultural differences on conflict prevention and peacebuilding in multicultural societies. In Handbook of research on the impact of culture in conflict prevention and peacebuilding (pp. 177-198). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2574-6.ch011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2574-6.ch011

Ogunnubi, O. (2022). South Africa’s soft power and the diplomacy of nuclear geopolitics. GeoJournal, *87*(2), 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10252-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10252-x

Ohnesorge, H. (2020). A taxonomy of soft power: Introducing a new conceptual paradigm. In Soft Power and the Future of U.S. foreign policy (pp. 15-34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29922-4_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29922-4_3

Pajtinka, E. (2014). Cultural diplomacy in theory and practice of contemporary international relations. Politické Vedy, *17*(3), 95-108.

Petrone, F. (2019). BRICS, soft power, and climate change: New challenges in global governance? Ethics & Global Politics, *12*(2), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1611339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1611339

Prinsloo, C. (2022). Tangible economic cooperation for South Africa and the BRICS: Taking stock and looking forward. In S. Zondi (Ed.), The political economy of intra-BRICS cooperation: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 89-112). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97397-1_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97397-1_9

Ramo, J. C. (2004). The Beijing consensus. The Foreign Policy Centre.

Saaida, M. (2013). Understanding global politics and diplomacy within the international relations context. Science for All Publications, *1*(1), 1-18.

Saskia, P. (2022). New perspectives on diplomacy: A new theory and practice of diplomacy; New perspectives on diplomacy: Contemporary diplomacy in action. International Affairs, *98*(1), 316-318. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab249

Sidiropoulos, E., Prinsloo, C., & Mpungose, L. (2018). BRICS, Africa, and global economic governance: Achievements and the future. Global Economic Governance Africa.

Slaughter, A. M. (2009). America’s edge: Power in the networked century. Foreign Affairs, *88*(1), 94-113.

Snow, N., & Taylor, P. M. (Eds.). (2009). Routledge handbook of public diplomacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891520

South African Reserve Bank. (2022). Quarterly bulletin. SARB.

Takahashi, T. (2021). Harnessing the power gap: Sponsorship behaviour of the rising BRICS in the United Nations General Assembly. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4037770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4037770

Tella, O. (2017). South Africa in BRICS: The regional power’s soft power and soft balancing. Politikon, *44*(3), 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2017.1295620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2017.1295620

Tella, O. (2022). The political economy of soft power: South Africa’s neo-liberal order and multinational corporations’ attraction in Africa. African Security Review, *31*(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2022.2058408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2022.2058408

Umezurike, S., & Ogunnubi, O. (2016). Counting the cost? A cautionary analysis of South Africa’s BRICS membership. Journal of Economics and Behavioural Studies, *8*(3), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v8i5(J).1444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v8i5(J).1444

U.S. Department of State. (1959). The cultural relations program of the U.S. Department of State. U.S. Government Printing Office.

Vasudeo, K. (2019). The inclusion of South Africa in BRICS scepticism and challenges within Africa. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, *7*(5), 83-91.

Wilson, E. J. (2008). Hard power, soft power, smart power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, *616*(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312618

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.