Brazil-Russia-China-South Africa (BRCS) Paradox: Reconciling Normative Ambitions with Strategic Interests in the United Nations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9972-3185
Abstract
This paper examines the strategic tactics used by Brazil, South Africa, China, and Russia within the United Nations to promote their interests. An analysis of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Reform (2017–2019), United Nations Development System Reform (2018–2021), and International Court of Justice (ICJ) Judicial Selection (2023) uncovers four tactics of normative realpolitik: (i) procedural contestation, (ii) personnel placement, (iii) financial leverage, and (iv) coalition coordination. The argument challenges traditional international relations theories by demonstrating that states combine normative rhetoric with material and procedural strategies to promote institutional change in ways that exceed the explanatory scope of both realism and constructivism.
References
Abdenur, A. E. (2016). Emerging powers and the creation of the UN: three ships of Theseus. Third World Quarterly, 37(7): 1171–1186.
Albuquerque, M. & da Costa, H.B.M. (2020). BRICS at the United Nations: BRICS at the United Nations: An Analytical Model. Journal of China and International Relations, 45-66.
Allison, R. (2017). Russia and the post-2014 international legal order: revisionism and realpolitik. International affairs, 93(3): 519-543.
Allison, R. (2022). Russian revisionism, legal discourse and the ‘rules-based’ international order, in Hynek, N. & Střítecký,
V. (eds.). Hybridisation of Political Order and Contemporary Revisionism. London: Routledge. 46-65.
Asadov, B., Gavrilenko, V. & Nemchenko, S. (2021). BRICS in international legal space: humanitarian imperatives of international security. BRICS Law Journal, 8(1): 8-34.
Baumann, M.O., Haug, S. & Weinlich, S. (2024). From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar. Global Policy, 15: 51-61.
Bloomfield, A. & Scott, S.V. (eds.). (2017). Norm entrepreneurs and the politics of resistance to global normative change. London: Routledge.
Boland, J. (2017). Worlds Systems Analysis Revisited: The BRICs and Shifting Global Centres. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University.
Boon, H.T. (2018). China’s global identity: Considering the responsibilities of a great power. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
Brosig, M. & Zähringer, N. (2015). Norm evolution a matter of conformity and contestedness: South Africa and the
responsibility to protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7(3- 4): 350-375.
Brütsch, C. & Papa, M. (2013). Deconstructing the BRICS: Bargaining Coalition, Imagined Community, or Geopolitical Fad? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 6(3): 299-327.
Chen, D., Mao, R. & Xue, L. (2018). Reforming the UN Development System: Impetus, Agenda, and Chinese Proposals. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 4(02): 193-212.
Clark, K. (2019). The Selective Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect Principle: A Comparative Case Study of Libya, Cote d’Ivoire, and Yemen. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation. Tartu, Estonia: University of Tartu.
Cooper, A.F. (2024). The Concertation Impulse in World Politics: Contestation Over Fundamental Institutions and the Constrictions of Institutionalist International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crowley-Vigneau, A., Baykov, A.A., Bunik, I.V. & Gao, A. (2024). Rebuilding the R2P with BRICS Countries: A Normative Perspective. МИРОВАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА И МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ, 68(4): 5-15.
Cüre, F. (2025). Adapting Responsibility to Protect (R2P) for a Multipolar World: Sovereignty, Intervention, and Veto Power. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(aop): 1-25.
Da Costa, M.G. (2022). A comparative overview of Brazil and South Africa’s BRICS Agendas, 2011-2017. Available from: https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jbs/article/ download/652/842/4229 (Accessed 11 June 2025).
Dijkhuizen, F. (2018). Joining hands or diverging interests? Sponsorship behaviour of the BRICS in the United Nations General Assembly. Available from: https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/46516/Dijkhuizen- Frederieke.pdf (Accessed 1 July 2025).
Dutta, A. (2019). Multilateral diplomacy: Role of BRICS in altering the discourse of global governance. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10): 1026-1031.
Esteves, P., Jumbert, M.G. & de Carvalho, B. (eds.). (2019). Status and the Rise of Brazil: Global Ambitions, Humanitarian Engagement and International Challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 153-173.
Feodorovich, M.B., 2019. The BRICS: paradigm Shift in Dealing with new Challenges. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения, 19(2): 201-206.
Freire, M.R. (2018). Political dynamics within the BRICS in the context of multilayered global governance, in Kirton, J. & Larionova, M. (eds.). BRICS and Global Governance. New York: Routledge. 70-88.
Frulli, M. (2023). International Criminal Justice at the Russia-Ukraine Crossroads. The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, 32(1): 231-247.
Fung, C.J. & Lam, S.H. (2022). Mixed report card: China’s influence at the United Nations. Lowy Institute, 18. Available from: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/mixed-report-card- china-s-influence-united-nations (Accessed 5 July 2025).
Fung, C.J. & Lam, S.H. 2021. Staffing the United Nations: China’s motivations and prospects. International Affairs, 97(4): 1143-1163.
Gehre, T. (2020). The history of BRICS’ International Relations (2009- 2019): discourses, innovation and sensitivities. Conjuntura Austral, 11(53): 161-179.
Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. 2025. Strengthening the safety net: Reflecting on 20 years of the UN Human Rights Council and the Responsibility to Protect. Available at: https:// www.globalr2p.org/publications/strengthening-the-safety-net- reflecting-on-20-years-of-the-un-human-rights-council-and-the- responsibility-to-protect/ (Accessed 30 November 2025).
Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. 2023. A Framework for Action for the Responsibility to Protect A Resource for States. Available at: https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/ a-framework-for-action-for-the-responsibility-to-protect-a- resource-for-states/ (Accessed 30 November 2025).
Giaccaglia, C. & Dussort, M.N. 2022. BRICS member states as norm entrepreneurs: worldviews and bids for power in global health and world energy governance. Third World Quarterly, 43(12): 2888-2906.
Guerrero, M.G. (2022). A neoinstitutionalist proposal to study the BRICS. Contexto internacional, 44(2), p.e20200120.
Gülseven, Y. (2023). China’s Belt and Road Initiative and South- South Cooperation. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 25(1): 102-117.
Haug, S., Foot, R., & Baumann, M. O. 2024. Power shifts in international organisations: China at the United Nations. Global Policy, 15, 5-17.
Hofmann, G.P. & Suthanthiraraj, K. (2019). Norm contestation and norm adaptation: R2P’s reframing over time. Global Responsibility to Protect, 11(2): 226-253.
ICJ. (2023). United Nations General Assembly and Security Council elect five Members of the Court. Press Release No.
/63, 10 November. Available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/ node/203244 (Accessed 30 November 2025).
Jarvis, S. 2025. Failure through Consensus Building: Rethinking the Normative Status of the Responsibility to Protect in a Pluralist Global Order. Journal of Global Security Studies, 10(3), p.ogaf021.
Jayan, P.A. (2012). BRICS: advancing cooperation and strengthening regionalism. India Quarterly, 68(4): 363-384.
Jetschke, A., Abb, P., Stephen, M.D. & Zürn, M. (2019). The devil is in the detail: The positions of the BRICS countries towards UN Security Council reform and the responsibility to protect, in Stephen, M.D. & Zürn, M. (eds.). Contested world orders:
Rising powers, Non-governmental organisations, and the politics of authority beyond the nation state. [Online]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/32424 [Accessed 13 June 2025]. 163-98.
Kenkel, K.M. & Cunliffe, P. (eds.). (2016). Brazil as a Rising Power: Intervention norms and the contestation of global order. New York: Routledge.
Kenkel, K.M. & Stefan, C.G. (2016). Brazil and the responsibility while protecting initiative: Norms and the timing of diplomatic support. Global Governance, 22(1):41-58.
Kenkel, K.M. (2019). Southern democracies and the Responsibility to Protect: perspectives from India, Brazil and South Africa. International Affairs, 95(1): 215-217.
Kirton, J. & Larionova, M. (eds.). (2018). BRICS and Global Governance. New York: Routledge.
Konyshev, V. & Sergunin, A. (2022). Theoretical Perspectives on BRICS: What Kind of an International Institution Is It?, in Lebedeva, M. & Morozov, V. (eds.). Turning Points of World Transformation: New Trends, Challenges and Actors. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 101-115.
Labuda, P.I. (2023). Beyond rhetoric: Interrogating the Eurocentric
critique of international criminal law’s selectivity in the wake of the 2022 Ukraine invasion. Leiden Journal of International Law, 36(4): 1095-1116.
Lagutina, M.L. (2019). BRICS in a world of regions. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 4(6): 442-458.
Lam, S.H. & Fung, C.J. (2024). Mapping China’s influence at the United Nations. The Review of International Organizations, 1-30.
Landsberg, C. (2015). Multilateralism and the UN in South Africa’s foreign policy. Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations, 4(8): 43-57.
Liu, B. & Li, X. (2025). China’s Aid in Global South Development Cooperation: A Study of Its Evolution. Forum for Development Studies, 52(4):1-25.
Mao, R. (2020). China’s growing engagement with the UNDS as an emerging nation: changing rationales, funding preferences and future trends (No. 2/2020). Discussion Paper. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/214202 (Accessed 1 July 2025).
Max‐Otto, B., Haug, S. & Weinlich, S. (2024). From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar. Global Policy, 15: 51-61.
Menegazzi, S. (2020). Rising powers and the reform of global economic governance: The BRICS and the normative challenge ahead. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 13(1): 135-150.
Mik, C. (2022). Russia’s Aggression against Ukraine: A Clash of Two Visions of the International Community and International Law. Polish Rev. Int’l & Eur. L., 11, p.57.
Mingst, K.A., Karns, M.P. & Lyon, A.J. (2022). The United Nations in the 21st century. New York: Routledge.
Modeme, L.E. (2018). The Security Council and the Legal Limits of Humanitarian Military Intervention. The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, 2(2):245-291.
Morris, S., Rockafellow, R. & Rose, S. (2021). Mapping China’s Multilateralism: A Data Survey of China’s Participation in Multilateral Development Institutions and Funds. Centre for Global Development, CGD Policy Paper, 241. Available from: https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/mapping-chinas- multilateralism-data-survey.pdf (Accessed 11 February 2025).
Okano-Heijmans, M. & van der Putten, F.P. (2018). A United Nations with Chinese Characteristics?. Clingendael, Netherlands Institute of International Relations. Available from: https:// www.clingendael.org/publication/united-nations-chinese- characteristics (Accessed 1 July 2025).
Pant, H.V. & Scholz, T. (2022). BRICS: expiring political relevance and inspiring new coalitions, in Rüland, J. & Carrapatoso, A. (eds.). Handbook on global governance and regionalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 148-159.
Passarelli, H.E. & Jumbert, M.G. (2019). “Brazil’s Evolving “Balancing
Act” on the Use of Force in Multilateral Operations: From Robust Peacekeeping to “Responsibility While Protecting”, in Esteves, P., Jumbert, M.G. & de Carvalho, B. (eds.). Status and the Rise of Brazil: Global Ambitions, Humanitarian Engagement and International Challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 153-173.
Pattison, J. (2016). The ethics of the “responsibility while protecting”: Brazil, the Responsibility to Protect, and the restrictive approach to humanitarian intervention. In Kenkel, K.M. & Cunliffe, P. (eds.). Brazil as a Rising Power: Intervention norms and the contestation of global order. New York: Routledge.
-126.
Peitz, L. (2015). The BRICS: Rhetoric or Reality? Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2015/12/22/the-brics-rhetoric-or- reality/#google_vignette (Accessed 13 May 2025).
Perovic, B. (2023). Transitional Justice and International Law: Comparative Insights from the Yugoslav Wars and Adaptations for the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Rutgers UL Rev., 76, p.1185.
Pruitt, C. (2022). Cooperative Liberalism or Competitive Realism in International Organizations in Africa? A Case Study of the Nature of the BRICS in Nigeria, Angola, and South Africa (Doctoral thesis). Washington, D.C.: Howard University.
Rached, G. & Rodrigues de Sá, R.M. (2024). BRICS 15 Years On: Challenges and Opportunities for Emerging Countries in the Shifting Global Institutional Landscape. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 17(1): 26-45
Rancāne, E. (2023).Russia’s use of rhetoric and international law: A case study of the interconnection between legalistic language and rational choice theory (Doctoral thesis). Latvia: Riga Graduate School of Law.
Rinaldi, L.A. & Pecequilo, S.C. 2021. The contemporary world order, BRICS and the R2P principle: The cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017). Colombia Internacional, (105): 3-28.
Rotmann, P., Kurtz, G. & Brockmeier, S. 2014. Major Powers and the Contested Evolution of a Responsibility to Protect. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute.
Rudyak, M. (2024). Decoding China’s Reading of Global Development and Cooperation Norms, in Mayer, M., Kavalski, E., Rudyak, M. & Zhang, X. (eds.). Routledge Handbook on Global China. London: Routledge. 285-297.
Rybachenko, D. (2020). Russia-China relations within the framework of BRICS and their international significance in terms of neo- Marxist theory and neoliberal institutionalism. Unpublished master’s thesis. Prague, Czechia: Univerzita Karlova.
Sawada, S. 2018. Brazilian Diplomacy and ‘Responsibility while Protecting’ International Relations, 194, 194_62-194_78.
Scott, K.L., Pearson, M.M. & Rector, C. (eds.). (2018). China’s Strategic Multilateralism: Investing in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sergunin, A. & Gao, F. (2018). BRICS as the subject of study of
international relations theory. International Organizations Research Journal, 13(4): 55-73.
Silva, L.V.B. (2017). Os BRICS e a atual ordem global: revisionistas ou conservadores?. Conjuntura Austral, 8(41): 26-38.
Skak, M. (2011). The BRIC Powers as Actors in World Affairs: Soft Balancing or … ? Paper presented at the IPSA-ECPR Joint Conference, Sao Paulo, February 16 to 19, 2011
Smith, K. (2016). South Africa and the responsibility to protect: From champion to sceptic. International Relations, 30(3): 391-405. Sperlich, Y. (2016). A review of the BRICS literature. Geneva School of
Economics and Management.
Stahn, C. (2023). Re-imagining the ICC in a Multipolar World. In The International Criminal Court in Its Third Decade. Brill Nijhoff. 562-594.
Stefan, C.G. (2017). On non-Western norm shapers: Brazil and the Responsibility while Protecting. European Journal of International Security, 2(1): 88-110.
Stefan, C.G. (2021). The responsibility to protect: Locating norm entrepreneurship. Ethics & International Affairs, 35(2): 197-211.
Stefan, C.G. (2021). The responsibility to protect: Locating norm entrepreneurship. Ethics & International Affairs, 35(2): 197- 211.
Stephen, M.D. & Zürn, M. (eds.). (2019). Contested world orders: Rising powers, non-governmental organisations, and the politics of authority beyond the nation-state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stephen, M.D. & Zürn, M. (eds.). (2019). Contested world orders: Rising powers, Non-governmental organisations, and the politics of authority beyond the nation state. [Online]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/32424 [Accessed 13 June 2025]. 163-98.
Stuenkel, O. (2020). BRICS: Towards Institutionalisation, in Inoguchi,
T. (ed.). The Sage Handbook of Asian Foreign Policy. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd. 521-544.
Takács, I. (2024). The power of jus cogens in the shadow of procedural obstacles. Legal dilemmas in international cases concerning severe human rights violations, special regards to the Ukraine-Russia War. Pedagogika Społeczna Nova, 4(7): 145-67.
Taleski, P.A. (2018). Bridging the Gap in Human Protection: Contesting the Responsibility to Protect through the Protection of Civilians Norm: A Comparative Study of Brazil, China and South Africa (Honours thesis). Canberra: Australian National University.
Tourinho, M., Stuenkel, O. & Brockmeier, S. (2016). “Responsibility while protecting”: Reforming R2P implementation. Global Society, 30(1):134-150.
UN. (2023a). General Assembly Elects Five Judges to International Court of Justice. GA/12559, 9 November. Available at: https://
press.un.org/en/2023/ga12559.doc.htm (Accessed 30
November 2025).
UN. (2023b). Security Council Elects Five Judges to International Court of Justice. SC/15485, 9 November. Available at: https:// press.un.org/en/2023/sc15485.doc.htm (Accessed 30
November 2025).
UN. (2018). South-South Integration and the SDGs: Enhancing Structural Transformation in Key Partner Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/ unpdf/sdg-2018-08 (Accessed 30 November 2025).
UNGA. (2017). Resolution A/RES/71/248: International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism for Syria. Available at: https:// www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/document/ ares71248.php (Accessed 30 November 2025).
UNOG. (2023). ‘Five judges elected to United Nations’ top court.’ UN Geneva News, 9 November. Available at: https://www. ungeneva.org/en/news-media/news/2023/11/87289/ five-judges-elected-united-nations-top-court (Accessed 30
November 2025).
UNOSSC. (2016). Framework of Operational Guidelines on United Nations Support to South-South Cooperation. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/826679?ln=en&v=pdf (Accessed 30 November 2025).
UNOSSC. (2024). UNDP and UNOSSC Introduce New Guidance on South-South Cooperation Mainstreaming and Integration.
Available at: https://unsouthsouth.org/2024/02/29/ undp-and-unossc-introduce-new-guidance-on-south-south- cooperation-mainstreaming-and-integration/ (Accessed 30
November 2025).
Vadell, J., Brutto, G.L., & Leite, A.C.C. (2020). The Chinese South- South development cooperation: an assessment of its structural transformation. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 63, p.e001.
Vadell, J.A. (2020). The BRICS initiative as a challenge to contemporary IPE, in Vivares, E. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook to Global Political Economy: Conversations and Inquiries. New York: Routledge. 311-327.
Valdir, B. & Elena, B. (2022). Elements of Critical Theory in BRICS: An evaluation of BRICS’ critique of global affairs. Вестник
Санкт-Петербургского университета. Международные отношения, 15(3): 330-345.
Valdir, B. & Elena, B. (2022). Elements of Critical Theory in BRICS: An evaluation of BRICS’ critique of global affairs. Вестник
Санкт-Петербургского университета. Международные отношения, 15(3): 330-345.
Van Noort, C. (2019). The Construction of Power in the Strategic Narratives of the BRICS. Global Society, 33(4): 462-478.
Weins, N. W. (2016). A constructivist perspective on the rise of China: A case of regional norm entrepreneurship. Parana: Federal University of Technology.
Weiss, T. & Abdenur, A. (eds.). (2018). Emerging powers and the UN: what kind of development partnership?. London: Routledge.
Worden, A. 2019. The CCP at the UN: Redefining Development and Rights. Available from: https://bst-europe.eu/europe-in-the- world/brics-the-global-south-challenging-the-status-quo/ (Accessed 24 April 2025).
Wu, L. (2025). Rising Powers and Global Governance: Dissecting the Dynamics Between Brazil and China The Case of BRICS, R2P, PSI and the UN Security Council Reform. Available from: https://cebri.org/revista/en/artigo/34/rising-powers-and- global-governance-dissecting-the-dynamics-between-brazil- and-china (Accessed 25 May 2025).
Wunderlich, C. (2020). Rogue States as Norm Entrepreneurs: Black Sheep or Sheep in Wolves’ Clothing?. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Wunderlich, C. (2022). Blinded by Delight?: A Plea for De-Moralising the Scholarship on Norm Entrepreneurs. European Review of International Studies, 9(3): 363-388.
Xiujun, X. (ed.). (2020). The BRICS studies: Theories and issues.
London: Routledge.
Yang, X.A. (2019). Theorising the BRICS: does the BRICS challenge the current global order?, in Xing, L. (ed.). The international political economy of the BRICS. New York: Routledge. 37-56.
Zhang, X. & Jing, Y. (2024). A mixed funding pattern: China’s exercise of power within the United Nations. Global Policy, 15:
-134.
Zimmermann, A. 2023. Five, four, three, and counting down: the outcome of the recent triennial elections at the International Court of Justice. European Journal of International Law (EJIL:Talk!). Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/five-four- three-and-counting-down-the-outcome-of-the-recent-triennial- elections-at-the-international-court-of-justice/ (Accessed 30
November 2025).
Downloads
Article Metrics Graph
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.