Assessing Theoretical Frameworks, Human Resources Management Implications and Emerging Technologies on the Water, Energy and Food (WEF) Nexus
Main Article Content
Keywords
Water, Energy, Food, Theories, Human Resources, Emerging Technologies
Abstract
The interactions of water, energy, and food resources resulting in WEF nexus thinking have been conceptualized as an integrated framework to achieve the security of the three vital resources. However, there are some gaps in WEF nexus research, which constrains the understanding and actualization of the nexus. Hence, this review paper aims to assess theories, human resource management implications, and emerging technologies' effect in understanding the nexus for its actualization. The research employed a qualitative research methodology to achieve the research objectives. The research findings revealed six (6) significant theories that can aid the understanding and actualization of the WEF nexus. The research also revealed that human resource management is strategic, highlighting the need for nexus thinking among human resources. Furthermore, the study revealed the three major emerging technologies of Artificial Intelligence, Big data analytics, and Internet of Things (IoT), which are shaping the WEF nexus through innovations and shaping the nature of the nexus. The study concluded that there is an interaction between the theories and human resources management for attaining the WEF nexus, which affects the extent of the sustainability of the innovations introduced by the emerging technologies. The study recommended quantification of the theories, training on nexus thinking of the current human resource in the WEF sectors, and capital investment on emerging technologies in the WEF nexus.
Article Metrics Graph
References
[2] Adepoju, O.O., and David, L.O., (2020). Covid – 19: Institutionalizing the production of Personal Protective Equipments (PPE) for safety of Health workers through Bilateral Relations between Nigeria and Japan. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual African Association for Japanese studies (AAJS) on Environment Technology and Covid – 19 (Online), on 6th – 7thOctober, 2020.
[3] Ahmad, F., Ahmad, S., Zaindin, M., and Adhami, A.Y., (2021). Robust Neutrosophic Modeling and Optimization Approach for Integrated Energy-Food-Water Security Nexus Management under Uncertainty. Water, 13(121), Pp. 1 - 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020121
[4] Anfara, V.A. & Mertz N.T. (2015) Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (2nd ed). Los Angeles: Sage
[5] Armstrong, M., (2016), Armstrong’s Handbook of Strategic Human Resource Management, London: Kogan Page
[6] Armstrong, M., and Taylor, S., (2015), Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, London: Kogan Page
[7] Balzacq, T., (2005). The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations 11:2, 171-201.
[8] Balzacq, T., (2011). A Theory of Securitization: Origins, Core Assumptions, and Variants. In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by Thierry Balzacq. London: Routledge.
[9] Berthod, O., (2016). Institutional Theory of Organizations. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_63-1
[10] Bizikova, L., Roy, D., Swanson, D., Venema, H. D. and McCandless, M. (2013). The Water-Energy-Food Security Nexus: Towards a Practical Planning and Decision-Support Framework for Landscape Investment and Risk Management. International Institute for Sustainable Development. http://www.iisd.org/library/water-energy-food-security-nexus-towards-practical-planning-and-decision-support-framework
[11] Bockova, K. H., Slavikova, G., and Gabrhel, J., (2015). Game Theory as a tool of Project Management. 20th International Scientific Conference Economics and Management (ICEM – 2015), Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213 (2015), Pp. 709 – 715. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.491.
[12] Botai J. O., Botai C. M., Ncongwane K. P., Mpandel S., Nhamo L., Masinde M., Adeola A. M., Migistu M. G., Tazvinga H. T., Murambadoro M. D., et al. (2021). A Review of the Water-Energy-Food Nexus Research in Africa. Sustainability 2021, 13,1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041762
[13] Boxall P and Purcell J (2016), Strategy and Human Resource Management, London: Palgrave Macmillan
[14] Bradbury – Jones, C., Taylor, J., and Herber, O., (2014). How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: Development of a new typology. Social Science & Medicine, 120 (2014), Pp. 135 – 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.014.
[15] Buzan B., (2008). The Changing Agenda of Military Security, in Hans Günter Brauch et al. Eds., Globalization and Environmental Challenges, Berlin, Springer, pp. 553-560.
[16] Buzan, B., & Wæver, O., (2003). Regions and Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[17] Buzan, B., Wæver, O., and De Wilde, J., (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
[18] Chand, S., (2017). Malthusian Theory of Population: Criticisms and Applicability. Your Article Library. Retrieved November 29, 2017, from http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/ population/malthusian-theory-of-population- criticisms-and-applicability/10885
[19] Charrett, C., (2009). A critical application of securitization theory: Overcoming the Normative Dilemma of writing security. International Catalan Institute for Peace. ISSN: 20135793.
[20] Chen, T., and Ni, Y., (2019). IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 218 012031
[21] Choe, M., and Noh, G., (2018). Combined Model of Technology Acceptance and Innovation Diffusion Theory for Adoption of Smartwatch. International Journal of contents, 14(3), Pp. 32 – 38. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2018.14.3.032
[22] Chowdhury, M. N. M., & Hossain, M. (2018). Population growth and economic development in Bangladesh: Revisited Malthus. Munich Personal RePEc Archieve, 91216. Retrieved on June 25, 2020 from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/91216/1/MPRA_paper_90826.pdf.
[23] Chu, Z., Xu, J., Lai, F., and Collins, B. J., (2018). Institutional Theory and Environmental Pressures: The Moderating Effect of Market Uncertainty on Innovation and Firm Performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(3), Pp. 392 – 403.
[24] Coles, N., and Hall, P., (2012). Water, Energy and Food security. Technology challenges of thinking in a nexus perspective. IEEE Technology and Society in Asia Conference, Singapore, October 26 – 28, 2012.
[25] Collins, C.S., and Stockton, C.M., (2018). The Central Role of Theory in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(2018), Pp. 1 – 10. Doi: 10.1177/1609406918797475
[26] Comyns, B., (2018). Climate Change reporting and multinational Companies: Insights from Institutional theory and International business. Accounting Forum, 42(2018), Pp. 65 – 77.
[27] Creswell, J.W., (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, second ed. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks.
[28] Daher, B., Saad, W., Pierce, S.A., Hulsmann, S., and Mohtar, R. H., (2017). Tradeoffs and Decision Support tools for FEW Nexus – Oriented Management. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep, 4(2017), Pp. 153 – 159. Doi: 10.1007/s40518-017-0075-3.
[29] Daniel, Mann, Johns and Mendenhall. (1998). Technical Assessment of Residential and Small Commercial Emerging Technologies. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
[30] Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
[31] Dearing, J.W., and Cox, J.G., (2018). Diffusion of Innovations Theory, Principles, and Practice. Health Affairs, 37 (2), Pp. 183 – 190. Doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104.
[32] Deslonde, V., and Becerra, M., (2018). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Exploring School Counselors’ Acceptance and use of Naviance. The Professional Counselor, 8(4), Pp. 369 – 382. doi:10.15241/vd.8.4.369
[33] DiMaggio, P.J., and Powell, W. W., (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields: American Sociological Review, Pp. 147 – 160.
[34] Dwivedi, A., Naresh, R.K., Kumar, R., Yadav, R.S., and Kumar, R., (2017). Precision Agriculture. Chapter Five, In: Promoting Agri – horticultural, technological innovations. Parmar Publishers & Distributors, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, Pp. 83 – 105.
[35] Emmanouil, S., Philhower, J., Macdonald, S., Khadim, F.K., Yang, M., Atsbeha, E., Nagireddy, H., Roach, N., Holzer, E., and Anagnostou, E.N., (2021). A comprehensive Approach to the design of a renewable Energy Microgrid for rural Ethiopia: The Technical and Social Perspectives. Sustainability, 13(3974). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073974
[36] Endo, A.; Burnett, K.; Orencio, P.M.; Kumazawa, T.; Wada, C.A.; Ishii, A.; Tsurita, I.; Taniguchi, M. (2015) Methods of the water-energy food nexus (2015). Water 2015, 7, 5806–5830.
[37] Eren, M. V. (2020). Nüfus artışı ile kalkınma arasındaki ilişki: Sahra-altı Afrika ülkeleri üzerine ampirik bir analiz. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 27, 141-158
[38] Evans, B. and Reid, J. (2014). Resilient life: The art of living dangerously. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.
[39] Fabiani, S., Vanino, S., Napoli, R., Zajicek, A., Duffkova, R., Evangelou, E., and Nino, P., (2020). Assessment of the Economic and Environmental sustainability of Variable Rate Technology (VRT) application in different wheat intensive European Areas. A water energy foo nexus approach. Environmental Science and Policy 114(2020), Pp. 366 – 376.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.019.
[40] FAO. (2014). The Water-Energy-Food Nexus A new approach in support of food security and sustainable agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
[41] Floyd, R., (2011). Can Securitization Theory Be Used in Normative Analysis? Towards a Just Securitization Theory. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 427–439.
[42] Foran, T. (2015). Node and regime: Interdisciplinary analysis of water-energy-food nexus in the Mekong region. Water Alternatives 8(1): 655-674
[43] Friel, D., (2017). Understanding Institutions: Different Paradigms, different conclusions. Revista de Administração 52 (2017). Pp. 212–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.001
[44] Garcia, F. A. P., (2014). Game Theory application for the assessment of complex energy – resources nexus in policy development. Master Degree Thesis, Imperial College London.
[45] Ghodsvali, M.; Krishnamurthy, S.; and de Vries, B (2019). Review of transdisciplinary approaches to food-water-energy nexus: A guide towards sustainable development. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 101, 266–278.
[46] Glover, J., Champion, D., Daniels, K., and Dainty, A., (2013). An Institutional theory Perspective on Sustainable Practices across the Dairy Supply chain. Institutional Theory and Sustainable Energy Practices.
[47] Grant, C., and Osanloo, A., (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for your House. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), Pp. 1 – 15, Doi: 10.5929/2014.4.2.9.
[48] Gupta, K. S., (2012). Population Growth, Malthusian Concern and Sustainable Development – Some Key Policies and Demographic Issues in India. Global Journal of Human Social Science. 12(3), Pp. 20 – 32.
[49] Gyawali, D. (2015). Nexus Governance: Harnessing Contending Forces at Work. Nexus Dialogue Synthesis Papers. Switzerland.
[50] Halaweh, M., (2013). Emerging Technology: What is it? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(3), Pp. 108 – 115.
[51] Hall, P.,& Taylor,R.(1996). Politicalscience and the three newinstitutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936–957
[52] Hameed, T., (2021). Productivity and Human Resources. The People Development Magazine. Retrieved from: https://peopledevelopmentmagazine.com/2021/10/31/productivity-and-human-resources/ Accessed 22/11/2021.
[53] Hoff, H., (2011). Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: the Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm.
[54] Hydroserv (2021). Water Reticulation. Hydroserv. Retrieved from https://www.hydroserv.com.au/water-reticulation/ (Accessed 8th October, 2021).
[55] IEA, International Energy Agency, (2014). Energy Security. IEA Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme. Paris. 〈http://www.iea.org/topics/energysecurity/.
[56] Ja Kim, M., Lee, C., and Contractor, N. S., (2019). Seniors’ usage of mobile social network sites: Applying theories of innovation diffusion and uses and gratifications. Computers in Human Behavior, 90 (2019), Pp. 60 – 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.046
[57] Jaradat, M., & Al–Mashaqba, A. M. (2014). Understanding the adoption and usage of mobile payment services by using TAM3. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 16(3), 271-296.
[58] Jennings, P.D., and Zandbergen, P.A., (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. The Academy of Management Review 20 (4), 1015–1052.
[59] Jepperson, R. L., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The Public Order and the Construction of Formal Organization, in the New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. Powell and PJ Di Maggio.
[60] Jwaifell, M., and Gasaymeh, A., (2013). Using the Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Explain the Degree of English Teachers’ Adoption of interactive whiteboards in the modern systems school in Jordan: A case study. Contemporary Educational technology, 4(2), Pp. 138 – 149.
[61] Kambolam (2021). Post-Harvest Technology. Kerala Agriculture University, Thrissur. Retrieved from https://www.amickau.nic.in/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=53&Itemid=87. (Accessed 8th October, 2021).
[62] Kumar, N.M., Dash, A., and Singh, N.K., (2018). Internet of Things (IoT): An Opportunity for Energy – Food – Water Nexus. 2018 International Conference on Power Energy, Environment and Intelligent Control (PEEIC) G. L. Bajaj Inst. of Technology and Management Greater Noida, U. P., India, Apr 13-14, 2018
[63] Leck, H.; Conway, D.; Bradshaw, M.; and Rees, J. (2015). Tracing the water-energy-food nexus: Description, theory and practice: Tracing the water-energy-food nexus. Geogr. Compass 2015, 9, 445–460.
[64] Lederman, N.G., and Lederman, J.S., (2015). What is a Theoretical Framework? A Practical Answer. Journal of Teacher Education, 26 (2015), Pp. 593 – 597. Doi: 10.1007/s10972 – 015 – 9443 – 2.
[65] Leeming, D. (2018). The use of theory in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 34 (4), 668-673
[66] Leese, M. and Meisch, S. (2015). Securitizing sustainability? Questioning the 'water, energy and food-security nexus'. Water Alternatives 8(1): 695-709
[67] Lewis, A.C., Cardy, R. L., and Huang, L. S. R., (2019). Institutional Theory and HRM: A New Look. Human Resource Management Review, 29 (2019), Pp. 316 – 335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.07.006
[68] Li, F., and Zhou, W., (2015). The Impact of the Game between stakeholders on the production of Farmland. Agricultural Sciences, 6(2015), Pp. 1317 – 1323. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2015.611126
[69] Lou, Antonio T. F. and Li, Eldon Y., (2017). Integrating Innovation Diffusion Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model: The adoption of blockchain technology from business managers’ perspective. ICEB 2017 Proceedings. 44. http://aisel.aisnet.org/iceb2017/44
[70] Lüger, T., (2018) : The principle of population vs. the Malthusian trap: A classical retrospective and resuscitation, Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 232, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Department of Law and Economics, Darmstadt, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-73419
[71] Lupovici, A., (2014). The Limits of Securitization Theory: Observational Criticism and the curious absence of Israel. International Studies Review, 16 (2014), Pp. 390 – 410.
[72] Mabhaudhi, T.; Mpandeli, S.; Nhamo, L.; Chimonyo, V.G.; Nhemachena, C.; Senzanje, A.; Naidoo, D.; and Modi, A.T. (2018). Prospects for improving irrigated agriculture in southern Africa: Linking water, energy and food. Water 2018, 10, 1881.
[73] Madani, K., (2010). Game Theory and Water Resources. Journal of Hydrology, 381(2010), Pp. 225 – 238. Doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.045.
[74] Madani, K., Darch, G., Parra, F., and Workman, M., (2015). Using Game theory to address Modern Resource Management Problems. Grantham Institute Briefing note No 2, September 2015, Imperial College London.
[75] Madhlopa, A., Keen, S., Sparks, D., and Moorlach, M., (2014). Draft policy framework for efficient water use in energy production. Rondebosch, South Africa: Energy Research Centre. http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/119/Papers-2014/14-Madhlopa-etal-Efficient_water_use_energy_ production.pdf
[76] Madsen, J. B., Robertson, P. E., and Ye, L. (2019). Malthus was right: Explaining a millennium of stagnation. European Economic Review, 118, 51-68
[77] Malthus, T. (1978). An Essay on the Principle of Population. Printed for J. Johnson, in St. Paul’s Church-Yard, London, UK.
[78] March, J.G., and Olsen, J.P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. NewYork: Free Press
[79] McGrane, S.J., Acuto, M., Artioli, F., Chen, P., Comber, R., Cottee, J., Farr – Wharton, G., Green, N., Helfgott., A., Larcom, S., McCann, J.A., O’Reilly, P., Salmoral, G., Scott, M., Todman, L.C., Gevelt, T.V., and Yan, X., (2018). Scaling the nexus: Towards integrated Frameworks for analyzing Water, Energy, and Food. The Geographical Journal, 185 (2019), Pp. 419 – 431. Doi: 10.1111/geoj.12256.
[80] Mclnnes, C., and Rushton, S., (2011). HIV/AIDS and Securitization theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(1), Pp. 115 – 138. DOI: 10.1177/1354066111425258
[81] Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens, W. W. (1972) The Limits to Growth. Universe, New York.
[82] Mekonnen, Y., Burton, L., Sarwat, A., and Bhansali, and Bhansali (2018). IoT Sensor Network Approach for Smart Farming: An Application in Food, Energy and Water System. IEEE, 978 – 1 – 5386 – 5566 – 5.
[83] Meleis, A. I., (2007). Theoretical Nursing. Development and Progress, Fourth ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[84] Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B., (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), Pp. 340 – 363.
[85] Meyer, S., and Ward, P., (2014). How to use social theory within and throughout qualitative research in healthcare contexts. Sociol. Compass, 8(5), Pp. 525 – 539.
[86] Mojelan, M. M., Satari, S., Soleimani, T., and Daryani, S. M., (2020). Human Resource Productivity Indicators Factor Analysis: Emphasizing Scientific and Ethical Factors. International Journal of Ethics & Society (IJES), 2(3), Pp. 1 – 11.
[87] Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. (1991) ‘Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting and Information Technology Innovation’. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
[88] Mueller, B., and Urbach, N., (2013). The Why, What, and How of Theories in is Research. Research Methods and Philosophy. Thirty fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, 2013. Pp. 1- 25.
[89] Mytelka, L., (2000). Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy. Industry and Innovation 7(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/713670244
[90] National Intelligence Council. (2012). Global trends 2030: Alternative worlds. http://globaltrends2030.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/global-trends-2030-november2012.pdf
[91] North, D.C., (1990). Institutions, Institutional change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[92] O’riordan, J., (2017). The practice of Human Resource Management. Institute of Public Administration.
[93] Okunola, A. M., Nathaniel, S. P., and Festus, V. B., (2018). Revisiting Population Growth and Food Production Nexus in Nigeria: An ARDL Approach to Co – integration. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E – Journal, 4(4), Pp 41 – 51.
[94] Osibanjo, A. O., and Adeniji, A. A., (2012). Human Resource Management: Theory & Practice. Pumark Nigeria Limited. ISBN: 978 – 978 – 50666 – 8 -5.
[95] Öztürk, L. (2012). Türkiye’de illerin yoksulluk nedeni olarak toplam doğurganlık hızları: Yatay kesit bir analiz, 1990-2000. Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 93-210
[96] Paul, D. (1994). Why are institutions the carriers of history? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5/2, 1–24.
[97] Pigott, T. D., (2017). The Role of Theory in Quantitative Data Analysis. The BERA/SAGE Handbook of Educational Research: 19, 2017. Retrieved from Loyola eCommons, Education: School of Education Faculty Publications and Other Works.
[98] Rahman, M. (2018). Validity of Malthusian theory of population in 20th century in terms of using scientific technology to the economic growth and strength. International Journal of Tax Economics and Management, 1(1), 13-21.
[99] Raoof, O., and Al – Raweshidy, H., (2010). Theory of Games: An Introduction. Research Gate. Pp. 1 – 13. Doi: 10.5772/46930.
[100] Rasul, G. & Sharma, B. (2015). The nexus approach to water-energy-food security: an option for adaptation to climate change. Climate Policy, 16, 682-702.
[101] Robertson, T.S., (1967). The process of Innovation and the diffusion of Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 31(1), Pp. 14 – 19.
[102] Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, Å.; Chapin III, F.S.; Lambin, E.; Lenton, T.M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C. and Schellnhuber, H.J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2).
[103] Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, Å.; Chapin III, F.S.; Lambin, E.F.; Lenton, T.M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; Nykvist, B.; de Wit, C.A.; Hughes, T.; van der Leeuw, S.; Rodhe, H.; Sörlin, S.; Snyder, P.K.; Costanza, R.; Svedin, U.; Falkenmark, M.; Karlberg, L.; Corell, R.W.; Fabry, V.J.; Hansen, J.; Walker, B.; Liverman, D.; Richardson, K.; Crutzen, P. and Foley, J.A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263): 472-475.
[104] Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Third edition. New York. Free Press
[105] Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
[106] Royston, R.M., and Pavithra, M.P., (2018). Vertical Farming: A Concept. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques, 4(3), Pp. 500 – 506.
[107] Sahin, I., (2006). Detailed Review of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Educational Technology – Related studies based on Rogers Theory. The Turkish online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 2(3), Pp. 1 – 10.
[108] Sakanko, M.A. & David, J. (2018). An Econometrics Validation of Malthusian Theory: Evidence in Nigeria. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi. Vol. 7 (1): 77 – 90. doi: http//dx.doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v7i1.6461
[109] Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
[110] Schmidt, V. (2010). Give peace a chance: Reconciling four (not three)“New Institutionalisms”. In D. Beland, & R. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[111] Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). Reflections of an accidental theorist. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 104–116
[112] Scott, W., (1991) Unpacking institutional arguments. In: Powell W, Di Maggio P (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 164–182
[113] Scott, W., (2013). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, Identities. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
[114] Scott, A., (2017). Making governance work for water – energy – food nexus approaches. Working Paper. Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN).
[115] Scott, W. R., (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, Pp. 493 – 511.
[116] Seth, T. (2017). Malthusian Theory of Population: Explained with its Criticism. Retrieved November 29, 2017, from http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/articles/ malthusiantheory-of-population-explained-with-its-criticism/1521
[117] Silva, C.C., and Pereira, A. E., (2019). International Security and New Threats: Securitization and Desecuritazation of drug trafficking at the Brazilian Borders. Contexto Internacional, 4(1), Pp. 209 – 234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2019410100011
[118] Silva, P.M., and Dias, G.A., (2007). Theories about Technology Acceptance: Why the users accept or reject the Information Technology. Brazillian Journal of Information Science, 1(2), Pp. 69 – 86.
[119] Slimane, K. B., Chaney, D., Ashlee, H., and Leca, B., (2019). Bringing Institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions. Journal of Business research, 105(2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.042
[120] Snyder, H., (2019). Literature Review as a research Methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(2019), Pp. 333 – 339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
[121] Staupe – Delgado, R., (2019). The Water – Energy – Food – Environmental security nexus: Moving the debate forward. Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00467-5
[122] Stein, C., Barron, J., and Moss, T., (2014). Governance of the nexus: from Buzz words to a strategic action perspective. Nexus Network Think Piece Series, Paper 003 (November 2014). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269694408
[123] Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., and F. Longstreth (1992) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[124] Storey J., (2007). Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, London: Thompson Learning
[125] Sudibyo, Y. A., and Jianfu, S., (2015). Institutional theory for explaining corruption: An empirical study on public sector organizations in China and Indonesia. Corporate Ownership & Control.13(1), Pp. 817 – 823.
[126] Terrapon – Pfaff, J., Ortiz, W., Dienst, C., and Grone, M., (2018). Energising the WEF nexus to enhance sustainable development at local level. Journal of Environmental Management, 223(2018), Pp. 409 – 416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.037
[127] Tesfatsion, L., (2019). Game Theory: Basic Concepts and Terminology. http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/GameDef.pdf
[128] UN (United Nations), (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf Accessed November 2021
[129] UN Water. (2013). Water Security and the Global Water Agenda. UN-Water Analytical Brief. United Nations University, Hamilton, Canada.
[130] Unat, E. (2020). A review of Malthusian theory of population under the scope of human capital. Focus on Research in Contemporary Economics (FORCE), 1(2), 132-147
[131] UNESCO (2019). Leveraging intersectorality for sustainable water security and peace. UNESCO International Water Conference, 9th January, 2019. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/item_4.4_ihp_tech_bur_19_unesco_waterconference_conceptnote_extrashort_9jan2019_en.pdf
[132] Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D., (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four Longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), Pp. 186 – 204.
[133] Vijayapriya, T., and Kothari, D.P., (2011). Smart Grid: An Overview. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 2011(2), Pp. 305 – 311. Doi:10.4236/sgre.2011.24035
[134] Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., (1944, 1947, 1953). Theory of games and economic behavior, 1919 Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[135] Wæver, Ole. (1995) Securitization and Desecuritization. In On Security, edited by Ronnie D. Lipschutz. New York: Columbia University Press.
[136] Weaver, O., (1989). ‘Security, the speech act: analyzing the politics of a word.’ In Research Training Seminar. Jerusalem/Tel Aviv, 25-26 June 1989. Copenhagen: Centre of Peace and Conflict Research.
[137] Wei, S.M.A., (2008). On the use of Game theoretic models for water resources management. Brandenburg University of Technology in Cottbus. Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Process Engineering. A PhD Thesis.
[138] Wilkinson, C., (2007). The Copenhagen School on Tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is Securitization Theory Useable Outside Europe? Security Dialogue 38 (1): 5–25.
[139] Williamson, O., (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38/3, 595–613
[140] Wingo., N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017) Faculty perceptions about teaching online: exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework, Online Learning 21(1), 15-35. doi: 10.10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
[141] World Economic Forum Water Initiative. (2011). Water security: The water-food-energy-climate nexus. Washington/Covelo/London: Island Press.
[142] World Economic Forum, WEF (2011). Water Security: The Water-Energy-Food-Climate Nexus. World Economic Forum Initiative.
[143] Zaidi, S.M.A.; Chandola, V.; Allen, M.R.; Sanyal, J.; Stewart, R.N.; Bhaduri, B.L.; McManamay, R.A. Machine learning for energy-water nexus: Challenges and opportunities. (2018). Big Earth Data 2018, 2, 228–267.
[144] Zhang, Y.F., Li, Y.P., Huang, G.H., and Ma, Y., (2021). A Copula – based Stochastic fractional programming method for optimizing water – food – energy nexus system under uncertainty in the Aral Sea Basin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292(2021), Pp. 1 – 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126037
[145] Zhao, S., Liu, M., Zhu, C.J., and Liu, H., (2020). The role of Leadership in human resource management: Perspectives and Evidence from Asia Pacific: Guest Editors. Asian Pacific Business Review, Pp. 1 – 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2020.1779496
[146] Zhu, W., I. K. Chew, and W. D. Spangler. (2005). CEO Transformational Leadership and Organizational Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Human–capital-enhancing Human Resource Management. The Leadership Quarterly 16 (1): 39–52.