The Rhetorical analysis of a documentary photograph
Copyright and Licensing:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Articles
- Submited: November 2, 2022
-
Published: November 3, 2022
Abstract
This article consists of three sections. In the first section, the theoretical foundations of rhetorical analysis as applied to visual messages is explicated. In the second section, the approach is illustrated by means of an example drawn from
a photographic essay on streetchildren. In the third section, some difficulties with the application of rhetorical analysis to documentary
photographs are discussed. It is theorized that straight documentary photographs are essentially open texts and that even though the
structural data uncovered in' the course a rhetorical reading might point towards a preferred interpretation, decisions about the author's persuasive intent with the image can only be made if the creative controls of the medium have been employed rhetorically.
Article Metrics Graph
References
- BACA, J.C. 1990. Identification by consensus of the critical constructs of visualliteracy: A Delphi study. Ed.D. dissertation, East Texas State University.
- BRUCE, V. and GREEN, P. 1990, Visual perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- BRUNETTE, P. and WILLS, D. 1989.Screen/Play: Derrida and Film Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- BURGIN, V. 1990. Photographic practice and art theory. In Thinking Photography. Edited by V. Burgin. London: McMillan Education: 39-83.
- BURKE, K. 1950. A rhetoric of motives. New York: Prentice House.
- CRAIG, R L. 1994. Universal Pragmatics: A critical approach to image ethics. In Visual literacy in the digital age: Selected readings from the 25th Annual Conference of the International Visual Weracy Association. Edited by D.G. Beauchamp, RA. Braden and J.C. Baca. Blacksburg: IVLA.
- CURTISS, 0.1995. From Iconic to lingual: Interpreting visual statements. In Imagery and VisualuteracyEdited by D.G. Beauchamp, R.A. Braden & RE. Griffin. Blacksburg: International Visual Literacy Association.
- DE BEER, C.S. 1991. Pitfalls in the research process: Some philosophical perspectives. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
- DURAND, J. 1970. Rhetorique et image publicitaire. Communications,vol.15 : 70-95 Thinking Photography. Edited by VBurgin. London: McMillan Education: 32-38
- FERGUS-JEAN, J. 1995. Documentary photography. In Focal Encyclopedia of Photography. Edited by R Zakia and L. Stroebel. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann : 223-224.
- FOURIE, P.J. 1980. 'n Semiologiese analyse van betekenis in die meganies~ beeld met spesifieke verwysing na anti-apartheidsfoto's. Tydskrif vir die Geesteswetenskappe 20(2): 94-106.
- FREESE, J.H. 1975. Aristotle: The 'Art" of Rhetoric. Cambidge: Harvard University Press.
- HARD AF SEGERSTAD, T. 1984. On pictorial and verbal communication: A colloquy. In Visual paraphrases: Studies in mass media imagery. Edited by H.B. Jonsson et al. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
- JAKOBSON, R 1960. Closing statement: Poetics and linguistics. In Style in Language. Edited by T.A. Sebeok. New York
- JEFFREY, I. 1989. Photography: A concise history. New York: Thames and Hudson.
- LESTER, P.M. 1995. Photojournalism issues for the 1990s: Concerns for all teachers of journalism courses. Ecquid Novi, vol.16, nO.1&2: 84-94.
- MESSARIS, P. 1994a. Visual literacy vs. Visual manipulation. Critical studies in mass commmunication, vol. 11, nO.2: 181-203.
- MESSARIS, P. 1994b. Visual literacy: Image, mind and reality. Oxford: West view Press
- METALLINOS, N. 1995. Approaches to visual communication media criticism and their application to television genres. In Imagery and Visual Literacy. Edited by D.G. Beauchamp, R.A Braden & RE. Griffin. Blacksburg: International Visual Literacy Association.
- PAILLIOTET, AW. 1994. Understanding visual information through deep viewing. In Visual literacy in the digital age: Selected readings from the 25th Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association. Edited by D.G. Beauchamp, RA Braden and J.C. Baca. Blacksburg: IVLA.
- PETERS, J.M. 1978. Pictorial Communication. Cape Town: David Philip.
- PETIE RSSON, R 1993. Visual information. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications
- PETIERSSON, R 1995. Associations from pictures. In Imagery and Visual Literacy. Edited by D.G. Beauchamp,
- RA Braden & RE. Griffin. Blacksburg: International Visual Literacy Association.
- RUSSELL, AL. 1994. Viewers' contribution to a photograph. In Visualliteracy in the digital age: Selected readings from the 25th Annual Conference of the International Visual Uteracy Association. Edited by D.G. Beauchamp. RA Braden and J.C. Baca. Blacksburg: IVLA.
- PINNEY, C. 1992. The parallel histories of antr.ophology and photography. In Anthropology and photography. 1860-1920. Edited by E. Edwards. London: Yale University Press.
- SLESS, D. 1986. In search of semiotics. Totowa: Baenes and Noble.
- STROEBEL, L. and BRUNO, M. 1995 Form. In Focal Encyclopedia of Photography. Edited by R Zakia and L.StroebeL Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann: 323.
- WATSON, J. and HILL, A. 1993. A dictionary of communication and media studies. London: Edward Arnold.
- ZAKIA, R.D. 1975. Perception and photography. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
- ZAKIA, RD. 1995. Snapshot photoraphy. In Focal Encyclopedia of Photography. Edited by R Zakia and L. Stroebel. Oxford: Butterworth- Heine
- mann: 725-726
How to Cite
The Rhetorical analysis of a documentary photograph. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 16(2), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v16i2.1917
