Mass mediatisation of social media: The case of Uganda’s 2016 presidential elections as covered by NTV on Facebook

The case of Uganda’s 2016 presidential elections as covered by NTV on Facebook

Share:

How to Cite

Mass mediatisation of social media: The case of Uganda’s 2016 presidential elections as covered by NTV on Facebook. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 39(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v39i1.1525
  • Articles
  • Submited: October 6, 2022
  • Published: October 6, 2022

Abstract

Based on the 2016 presidential election in Uganda as covered on the NTV Facebook page,
this paper, emanating from a doctoral study, shows how the medium of television has mass
mediatised Facebook. The onset of social media has meant that audiences increasingly turn
to such platforms for their information needs, including news. As a consequence, the traditional
media’s role of providing such news and information updates is demoted and threatened. In order
to stay relevant, mass media has had to join social media platforms to provide the aforementioned
information/news. In attempting to do so, mass media has consequently mediatised social media,
especially as seen through the lens of the agenda-setting theory, which this paper argues is in
contrast with the discursive nature of social media as a public sphere.

References

  1. Respondent A (2018). 'How NTV used Facebook during the 2016 presidential elections in Uganda.' Interview, 14 April 2018. NTV Uganda employee.
  2. Respondent B (2018). 'How NTV used Facebook during the 2016 presidential elections in Uganda.' Interview, 17 April 2018. NTV Uganda employee.
  3. Respondent F (2018). 'Engagement of the Facebook audience during the 2016 presidential elections in Uganda.' Interview, 24 April 2018. NTV Uganda employee.
  4. Respondent R (2018). 'Engagement of the Facebook audience during the 2016 presidential elections in Uganda.' Interview, 19 April 2018. NTV Uganda employee.
  5. African Centre for Media Excellence (ACME) (2016). Monitoring media coverage of the 2016 elections: Final report. Available from: https://acme-ug.org/2016/06/01/monitoring-mediacoverage-of-the-2016-electionsfinal-report/
  6. Aruguete, N. (2017). The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicacion y Sociedad, 28: 35-58.
  7. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i28.2929
  8. Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 616: 79-93.
  9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
  10. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Cushion, S. (2012). Television journalism. London: Sage.
  12. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251218
  13. Dwyer, T. (2010). Media convergence. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  14. Fairclough, N. (1998). Political discourse in the media: An analytical framework. In Bell, A. & Garrett, P. (eds.) Approaches to media discourse, 142-162. Oxford: Blackwell.
  15. Feezell, J. (2018). Agenda setting through social media: the importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2): 482- 494.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895
  17. Fortunato, J. & Martin, S. (2016). The intersection of agenda-setting, the media environment, and election campaign laws. Journal of Information Policy, 6: 129-153. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0129
  18. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0129
  19. Freedman, D. (2010). The political economy of the 'new' news environment. In Fenton, N. (ed.) New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age, 35-50. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  20. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280010.n3
  21. Frère, Marie-Soleil. (2015). The media and elections in post-conflict central African countries. In Proceedings of the Election Processes, Liberation Movements and Democratic Change in Africa Conference, Maputo, April 2010, 1-14.
  22. Gaber, R.H. & Wright, L.N. (2014). Fast-food advertising in social media: A case study on Facebook in Egypt. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 9(1): 52-63.
  23. Gumede, W. (2016). Rise in censorship of the internet and social media in Africa. Journal of African Studies, 8(3): 413-421. DOI:10.1386/jams.8.3.413_7
  24. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams.8.3.413_7
  25. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. London: Polity Press.
  26. Hinton, S. & Hjorth, L. (2013). Understanding social media. London: Sage.
  27. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270189
  28. Holub, R. (1991). Jurgen Habermas: Critic in the public sphere. London: Routledge.
  29. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203314968
  30. Ipsos Connect. (2017). Media consumption and usage habits analysed, Kampala: Uganda Media Landscape Report.
  31. Kanyoro, R. (2015). How social media has evolved in Uganda. Daily Monitor. Available from: http://www.monitor.co.ug/artsculture/Reviews/How-social-media-has-evolved-in-Uganda/691232-2771872-cmhu0q/index.html
  32. Killian, G. & McManus, K. (2015). A marketing communications approach for the digital era: Managerial guidelines for social media integration. Business Horizons, 58: 539-549. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.05.006
  33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.05.006
  34. Lim, N. (2009). Novel or novice: Exploring the contextual realities of youth political participation in the age of social media. Philippine Sociological Review, 57: 61-78. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23898344
  35. Makinen, M. & Kuira, M. (2008). Social media and postelection crisis in Kenya. Press/Politics, 13(3): 328-335. DOI:10.1177/1940161208319409
  36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319409
  37. McCombs, M. & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2): 176-187.
  38. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
  39. McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  40. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2014.02.01.003
  41. Miller, J. (2007). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology, 28(6): 689-717. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20447084
  42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00600.x
  43. Mitchelstein, E., & Boczkowski, P. (2009). Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 10(5): 562-586.
  44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909106533
  45. Owen, D. (2010). New media and political campaigns. In Kenski, K. & Jamieson, K. (eds.) Political communication, 153-170. New York: Oxford University Press.
  46. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  47. Ritchie, J. & Lewis, J. (eds.) (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
  48. Robertson, P.S., Vatrapu, K.R., & Medina, R. (2010). Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. presidential election, Information Polity. 15: 11-31. DOI:10.3233/IP-2010-0196
  49. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2010-0196
  50. Rodny-Gumede, Y. (2017). The impact of social media on journalism. In Fourie, P. (ed.) Media studies: Social (new) media and mediated communication today, Vol. 4. Cape Town: Juta.
  51. Rugambwa, I. & Messerschmidt, M. (2015). Tagging, tweeting, posting: Social media and politics in Uganda. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Country Report. Kampala
  52. Samuel-Azran, T., Yarchi, M., & Wolfsfeld, G. (2015). Equalization versus normalization: Facebook and the 2013 Israeli elections. Social Media + Society. July-December: 1-9. DOI:10.1177/2056305115605861
  53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115605861
  54. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students, 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  55. Schwartz, S. (2015). Campaigning and contestation: Comments on politicians' Facebook pages during the 2011 Danish general election campaign. Social Media + Society. 1(2): 1-11. DOI:10.1177/2056305115622480
  56. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115622480
  57. Sigdel, B. (2013). Census and sampling method. Available from: https://bhanusigdel.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/census-and-sampling-method/
  58. Skalski, P., Neuendorf, K., & Cajigas, J. (2017). Content analysis in the interactive media age. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  59. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878.n7
  60. Wilson, E.R., Gosling, D.S., & Graham, T.L. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3): 203-220. DOI:10.1177/1745691612442904
  61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904
  62. Wimmer, R.D. & Dominick, J.R. (2003). Mass Media Research, Belmont: Wadsworth.
How to Cite
Mass mediatisation of social media: The case of Uganda’s 2016 presidential elections as covered by NTV on Facebook. (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 39(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v39i1.1525

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate