Visualising “the vulnerable”: Understanding vulnerability to COVID-19 in relation to the South African COVID-19 Vulnerability Index (SA CVI)

Marnell Kirsten | Bio
Senior lecturer at Red & Yellow Creative School of Business; Postgraduate student at Stellenbosch University
Marina Joubert
Stellenbosch University
Share:

How to Cite

Visualising “the vulnerable”: Understanding vulnerability to COVID-19 in relation to the South African COVID-19 Vulnerability Index (SA CVI). (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 41(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i2.1422
  • Articles
  • Submited: August 10, 2022
  • Published: December 15, 2022

Abstract

This study investigates the definition of “vulnerability” in the visualisation and underpinning index of Stats SA’s South African COVID-19 Vulnerability Index (SA CVI)’s data visualisation dashboard. The paper establishes definitions of vulnerability in relation to literature before COVID-19, research in the time of the pandemic, and in relation to data visualisation. The discussion finds that while the pandemic is widely perceived as a “health crisis”, South African vulnerability to this pandemic is mostly constituted by factors that fall outside of normative “health” concerns – beyond “straightforward” medical, biological and epidemiological factors. Instead, South African vulnerability to COVID-19, and the “health” of its citizens in this context, are largely to be understood as systemic, socio-economic, and necropolitical conditions. It is found that these conditions have not been generated by the pandemic but have rather been exposed by it.  

References

  1. Adger, W.N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16: 268-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
  2. Akala, B. (2018). Challenging gender equality in Southern African transformation policies – a case of the White Paper: A programme for the transformation of Higher Education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(3): 226-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/32-3-1521
  3. Alexander, M.C. (2019). The nine provinces of South Africa. Available from: https://southafrica-info.com/land/nine-provinces-south-africa/
  4. Alsop, T. (2021). Computer penetration rate among households in Africa 2005-2019. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/748549/africa-households-with-computer/
  5. Bickford-Smith, V. (1995). South African urban history, racial segregation and the unique case of Cape Town?. Journal of Southern African Studies, 21(1): 63-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057079508708433
  6. Bourdieu, P. (2018). Cultural production and social reproduction. In R. Brown (ed.). Knowledge, education, and cultural change. London: Routledge. 71-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351018142-3
  7. Bowe, E., Simmons, E., & Mattern, S. (2020). Learning from lines: Critical COVID data visualizations and the quarantine quotidian. Big Data & Society, DOI: 10.1177/2053951720939236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720939236
  8. Braidotti, R. (2020). “We” are in this together, but we are not one and the same. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 17: 465-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10017-8
  9. Broadbent, A. (2020a). Lockdown is wrong for Africa. Available from: https://mg.co.za/article/2020-04-08-is-lockdown-wrong-for-africa/
  10. Broadbent, A. (2020b). Why a one-size-fits-all approach to COVID-19 could have lethal consequences. Available from: https://theconversation.com/why-a-one-size-fits-all-approach-to-covid-19-could-have-lethal-consequences-134252
  11. Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Business Tech. (2020). These are the richest cities in South Africa. Available from: https://businesstech.co.za/news/wealth/442954/these-are-the-richest-cities-in-south-africa/
  13. Butler, J. (2020). On COVID-19, the politics of non-violence, necropolitics, and social inequality Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bnj7H7M_Ek&t=679s
  14. Butler, J. (2016). Rethinking vulnerability and resistance. In J. Butler, Z. Gambetti & L. Sabsay (eds.). Vulnerability in resistance. Durham & London: Duke University Press. 12-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11vc78r.6
  15. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable?. London: Verso.
  16. Coombes, A. (2003). Visual culture and public memory in a democratic South Africa. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
  17. Dawson, E. (2020). On necropolitics and science communication in 2020. Available from: https://pcst.co/webinars/20200730
  18. Delor, F. & Hubert, M. (2000). Revisiting the concept of ‘vulnerability’. Social Science & Medicine, 50(11): 1557-1570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00465-7
  19. D’Ignazio, C. & Klein, L. (2020). Data feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001
  20. Dixon, B.E., Grannis, S.J., McAndrews, C., Broyles, A.A., Mikels-Carrasco, W., Wiensch, A. et al. (2021).
  21. Leveraging data visualization and a statewide health information exchange to support COVID-19 surveillance and response: Application of public health informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab004
  22. Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge Classics.
  23. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
  24. Foucault, M. (1977). The political function of the intellectual. Radical Philosophy, 17(Summer): 12-14.
  25. Fowler, R. (1981). Literature as social discourse: The practice of linguistic criticism. London: Batsford Academic.
  26. Glewwe, P. & Hall, G. (1998). Are some groups more vulnerable to macroeconomic shocks than others? Hypothesis tests based on panel data from Peru. Journal of Development Economics, 56(1): 181-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00058-3
  27. Gray, J. (2020). The data epic: Visualization practices for narrating life and death at a distance. In M. Engebretsen & H. Kennedy (eds.). Data visualisation in society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 313-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzgb8c7.25
  28. GSMA. 2020. The mobile economy: Sub-Saharan Africa 2020. Available from: https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/wpcontent/uploads/2020/09/GSMA_MobileEconomy2020_SSA_Eng.pdf
  29. Gurney, K. (2018). Zombie monument: Public art and performing the present. Cities, 77: 33-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.002
  30. Guyot, S. & Seethal, C. (2007). Identity of place, places of identities, change of place names in post-apartheid South Africa. The South African Geographical Journal, 89(1): 55-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2007.9713873
  31. Hanekom, P. (2020). Covid-19 exposes South Africa’s digital literacy divide. Available from: https://mg.co.za/opinion/2020-09-08-covid-19-exposes-south-africas-digital-literacy-divide/
  32. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  33. Houssay-Holzschuch, M. & Teppo, A. (2009). A mall for all? Race and public space in post-apartheid Cape Town. Cultural Geographies, 16: 351-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474009105052
  34. Hufschmidt, G. (2011). A comparative analysis of several vulnerability concepts. Natural Hazards, 58: 621-643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9823-7
  35. Hurst, S. (2008). Vulnerability in research and health care: Describing the elephant in the room?. Bioethics, 22(4): 191–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00631.x
  36. Jackson, D., Hayter, M., Carter, B. & Nyamathi, A. (2012). Editorial. Contemporary Nurse, 42(2): 142-144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2012.11002642
  37. Janks, H. (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(3): 329-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630970180302
  38. Jansen, J. (ed.). (2019). Decolonisation in universities: The politics of knowledge. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18772/22019083351
  39. Kiaghadi, A., Rifai, H.S. & Liaw, W. (2020). Assessing COVID-19 risk, vulnerability and infection prevalence in communities. PLOS ONE, 15(10). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0241166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241166
  40. Kim, S.J., & Bostwick, W. (2020). Social Vulnerability and racial inequality in COVID-19 deaths in Chicago. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4): 509-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120929677
  41. Lange, M., Rogers, W. & Dodds, S. (2013). Vulnerability in research ethics: A way forward. Bioethics, 27(6): 333–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12032
  42. Ligon, E. & Schechter, L. (2003). Measuring vulnerability. The Economic Journal, 113(March): C95-C102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00117
  43. Luna, F. (2009). Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2(1): 121–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121
  44. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.
  45. Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W. & Dodds, S. (2014) Introduction: What is vulnerability and why does it matter for moral theory? In C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers & S. Dodds (eds.). Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.003.0001
  46. Marks, R., & Bezzoli, M. (2001). Palaces of desire: Century City, Cape Town and the ambiguities of development. Urban Forum, 12(1): 27-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-001-0002-x
  47. Marschall, S. (2009). Landscape of memory: Commemorative monuments, memorials and public statuary in post-apartheid South Africa. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004178564.i-410
  48. Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1): 11-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-11
  49. Mukumbang, F.C., Ambe, A.N. & Adebiyi, A.O. (2020). Unspoken inequality: how COVID-19 has exacerbated existing vulnerabilities of asylum-seekers, refugees, and undocumented migrants in South Africa. International Journal for Equity in Health, 141(19). DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01259-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01259-4
  50. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw
  51. Nuttall, S. & Mbembe, A. (eds.). (2008). The elusive metropolis. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jhd1
  52. Peter, E. & Friedland, J. (2017). Recognizing risk and vulnerability in research ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 12(2): 107-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617696920
  53. Ponjavić, M., Karabegović, A., Ferhatbegović, E., Tahirović, E., Uzunović, S., Travar, M. et al. (2020). Spatio-temporal data visualization for monitoring of control measures in the prevention of the spread of COVID-19 in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Medicinski Glasnik, 17(2): 265-274.
  54. Powell, A. (2020). To be seen we must be measured: Data visualisation and inequality. Available from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2020/06/26/to-be-seen-we-must-be-measured-data-visualisation-and-inequality/
  55. Redefining vulnerability in the era of COVID-19 (2020). The Lancet, 395(10230): 1089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30757-1
  56. Robertson, H. & Travaglia, J. (2020). The Necropolitics of COVID-19: Will the COVID-19 pandemic reshape national healthcare systems? Available from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/05/18/the-necropolitics-of-covid-19-will-the-covid-19-pandemic-reshape-national-healthcare-systems/
  57. Schmahmann, B. (2016). The fall of Rhodes: The fall of a sculpture from the University of Cape Town. Public Art Dialogue, 6(1): 90-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21502552.2016.1149391
  58. Stats SA. (2020a). Mapping vulnerability to COVID. Available from: http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=13875&gclid=Cj0KCQjwp86EBhD7ARIsAFkgakh0NH9EetznD_Hu25zKOU1QFrQaf14Yn5URTJIWpKPRLvKv0Msggf8aAg5JEALw_wcB
  59. Stats SA. (2020b). South African COVID-19 Vulnerability Index Dashboard. Available from: https://app.powerbi.com/viewr=eyJrIjoiZTNlNmNjMWUtZTQwMC00YjA5LWI0ODUtZGVlYmVlYjJkZjcxIiwidCI6ImNhMzhhOWU1LThjZTItNDFlOC1hNDFlLTY0N2M3YjUwZGI0YSIsImMiOjl9
  60. Stats SA. (2020c). South African COVID-19 Vulnerability Index Dashboard: Frequently asked questions. Available from: http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report%2000-80-05/SA%20CVI%20FAQs.pdf
  61. Stats SA. (2020d). South African COVID-19 Vulnerability Index: Technical report. Available from: http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report%2000-80-05/SA CVI%20Technical%20Report.pdf
  62. Williams, G. (2016). The rise of multi-generational households. Available from: https://www.news24.com/fin24/finweek/featured/the-rise-of-multi-generational-households-20160210
  63. Žižek, S. (2020). Pan(dem)ic! COVID-19 shakes the world. New York: OR Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16t6n4q
  64. Žižek, S. (2008). Violence: Six sideways reflections. New York: Picador.
How to Cite
Visualising “the vulnerable”: Understanding vulnerability to COVID-19 in relation to the South African COVID-19 Vulnerability Index (SA CVI). (2022). Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 41(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i2.1422

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

  • ORCID
  • Crossref
  • PubMed
  • Clarivate