The New Apartheid

Main Article Content

Masilo Lepuru https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-1022

Keywords

Abstract

The fundamental distinction between a Civil Rights movement such as the African National Congress and a liberation movement like Poqo lies in the status of white settlers and Apartheid. The mythologisation of Apartheid by promoting it to the main problem in liberation politics and history in conqueror South Africa  is the persistent intellectual obsession of the Congress Tradition. A trenchant contestation and rejection of Apartheid as the fundamental antagonism in the history of the struggle for national liberation is the defining trait of a liberation movement and liberation intellectual production.Having written a book entitled Democracy & Delusion: 10 Myths (2019), in which he debunks what he considers to be myths about the so-called post-Apartheid South Africa, Sizwe is back again only this time he is reinventing two myths.In the book under review, entitled The New Apartheid (2021), Sizwe promotes the delusion and first myth of Apartheid as the problem and the second myth of the ANC as a liberation movement. This review is about these two myths.

Abstract 25 | PDF Downloads 22

References

Armah, A. K. (1973). Two Thousand Seasons: London: Heinemann African Writers Series.
Carruthers, J. (1999). Intellectual Warfare. New York: Third World Press.
Dladla, N, The liberation of history and the end of South Africa: some notes towards an Azanian historiography in Africa, South, South African Journal on Human Rights, Volume 34 Number 3, 2018, p. 415 – 440. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2018.1550940
Klare, K. Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism, 14 S. Afr. J. on Hum. Rts. 146 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.1998.11834974
Lipton, M. (2007). Liberals, Marxists and Nationalist: Competing Interpretations of South African History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-60270-4
Mafeje, A. (1998). White liberals and black nationalists: strange bedfellows, South African Political Economic Monthly Vol 11, 13 pp 45-48.
Modiri Joel M. (2018): Conquest and constitutionalism: first thoughts on an alternative jurisprudence, South African Journal on Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2018.1550939
Mpofu-Walsh, S. (2017). Democracy & Delusion: 10 MYTHS in South African Politics. Cape Town: Tafelberg.
Mpofu-Walsh, S. (2021). The New Apartheid. Cape Town: Tafelberg.
Ngcukaitobi, T. (2018). The Land Is Ours: South Africa’s First Black Lawyers and the Birth of Constitutionalism. South Africa: Penguin Random House South Africa.
Ngcukaitobi, T. (2021). Land Matters: South Africa’s Failed Land Reforms and the Road Ahead. South Africa: Penguin Random House South Africa.
Pheko, M. (2012). How Freedom Charter Betrayed The Dispossessed: The Land Question in South Africa: Benoni: Tokoloho Development Association.
Raboroko, P.N. (1960). Congress and the Africanists: (1) the Africanist case, Africa South Vol4 No3 Apr-Jun 1960 pages 24 to 32.
Ramose, M. B (2006). ‘The king as memory and symbol of African Customary Law’ in The Shade of New leaves, Governance in Traditional Authority (ed Heinz) A South African perspective. Pp 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2007.10854593
Ramose, M. B. (2007). ‘In Memoriam: Sovereignty and the “new” South Africa.’ Griffith Law Review Vol 16. pp 310-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2018.1550937
Ramose, M. B. (2018). ‘Towards a Post-conquest South Africa: beyond the constitution of 1996’. South African Journal on Human Rights. Vol, 34. Pp 326-341.
Sobukwe, R.M. (1957/2013). ‘The nature of the struggle today’ in Karis, T.G. and Gerhardt, G.M. (eds.) From protest to challenge: A Documentary History of African Politics in South Africa, 1882–1990. Volume 3: Challenge and Violence, 1953–1964. Auckland Park: Jacana.
Soske, J. (2017). Internal Frontiers: African nationalism and the Indian diaspora in twentieth-century South Africa. Ohio University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv224tzhc